On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:29:51 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:

On Sep 21, 4:37*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:15:36 -0700, almostcutmyhairtoday wrote:
On Sep 21, 1:32*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:37:56 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:

How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social
programs?

None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack
of, of Sarah Palin.

You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is.

What are you babbling about now? *I "asked for a cite"? *Where do you
see a request in this thread?

This is the cite you've asked for. *If you don't remember when or
where you asked for such a cite, that's your problem.

You're making **** up again, just like your twisted subject line.

Anyway, good luck with your tax evasion program.

You are a pathological liar:

Little squirrel, you're the one who said none of his wages will go to
Barack's social programs.

You're making **** up again. You claimed that I asked for a cite.

That's another lie.

You're boring.

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bush Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

On Sep 22, 3:13*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:29:51 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 21, 4:37*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:15:36 -0700, almostcutmyhairtoday wrote:
On Sep 21, 1:32*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:37:56 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:

How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social
programs?

None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack
of, of Sarah Palin.

You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is.

What are you babbling about now? *I "asked for a cite"? *Where do you
see a request in this thread?

This is the cite you've asked for. *If you don't remember when or
where you asked for such a cite, that's your problem.

You're making **** up again, just like your twisted subject line.

Anyway, good luck with your tax evasion program.

You are a pathological liar:

Little squirrel, you're the one who said none of his wages will go to
Barack's social programs.

You're making **** up again. *You claimed that I asked for a cite. *

That's another lie.

You're boring.

--
Regards, Curly

Sorry little squirrel, but it's all on google. Now be a good little
squirrel and go dig up your nuts.

On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:56:23 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:

On Sep 22, 3:13*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:29:51 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 21, 4:37*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:15:36 -0700, almostcutmyhairtoday wrote:
On Sep 21, 1:32*pm, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:37:56 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:

How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his
social programs?

None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or
lack of, of Sarah Palin.

You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is.

What are you babbling about now? *I "asked for a cite"? *Where do
you see a request in this thread?

This is the cite you've asked for. *If you don't remember when or
where you asked for such a cite, that's your problem.

You're making **** up again, just like your twisted subject line.

Anyway, good luck with your tax evasion program.

You are a pathological liar:

Little squirrel, you're the one who said none of his wages will go to
Barack's social programs.

You're making **** up again. *You claimed that I asked for a cite. *

That's another lie.

You're boring.

--
Regards, Curly

Sorry little squirrel, but it's all on google. Now be a good little
squirrel and go dig up your nuts.

The thread is here, where did I ask you for a cite? Show us the request
that launched your distraction. You cannot, it doesn't exist, just like
most of the fantasies pouring out of your (virtual) mouth.

You make **** up. Oh, and you lie.

"I have found a few differences in pathological liar and a "slime ball"
liar. Pathological liars cannot tell that they are lying they actually
believe the lie as soon as it comes out of their mouth. They lie about
unimportant things that don't really matter to anyone. This can be caused
by mental defect but isn't always. Slime-ball liars lie about things that
make them look better or embellish to get attention. They also lie to keep
their butts out of trouble and to get what they want."
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_can_yo...hological_liar

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bush Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

On Sep 22, 7:29*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:56:23 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 22, 3:13*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:29:51 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 21, 4:37*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:15:36 -0700, almostcutmyhairtoday wrote:
On Sep 21, 1:32*pm, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:37:56 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:

How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his
social programs?

None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or
lack of, of Sarah Palin.

You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is.

What are you babbling about now? *I "asked for a cite"? *Where do
you see a request in this thread?

This is the cite you've asked for. *If you don't remember when or
where you asked for such a cite, that's your problem.

You're making **** up again, just like your twisted subject line.

Anyway, good luck with your tax evasion program.

You are a pathological liar:

Little squirrel, you're the one who said none of his wages will go to
Barack's social programs.

You're making **** up again. *You claimed that I asked for a cite. *

That's another lie.

You're boring.

--
Regards, Curly

Sorry little squirrel, but it's all on google. *Now be a good little
squirrel and go dig up your nuts.

The thread is here, where did I ask you for a cite? *Show us the request
that launched your distraction. *You cannot, it doesn't exist, just like
most of the fantasies pouring out of your (virtual) mouth.

It exists. I choose not to play your squirrelly little rodent
games.

Even if your nose lights up, Santa won't let you to chew on his
reindeer's nuts.

On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:06:20 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:

On Sep 22, 7:29*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:56:23 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 22, 3:13*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:29:51 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 21, 4:37*pm, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:15:36 -0700, almostcutmyhairtoday wrote:
On Sep 21, 1:32*pm, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:37:56 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:

How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his
social programs?

None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or
lack of, of Sarah Palin.

You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is.

What are you babbling about now? *I "asked for a cite"? *Where
do you see a request in this thread?

This is the cite you've asked for. *If you don't remember when
or where you asked for such a cite, that's your problem.

You're making **** up again, just like your twisted subject line.

Anyway, good luck with your tax evasion program.

You are a pathological liar:

Little squirrel, you're the one who said none of his wages will go
to Barack's social programs.

You're making **** up again. *You claimed that I asked for a cite. *

That's another lie.

You're boring.

--
Regards, Curly

Sorry little squirrel, but it's all on google. *Now be a good little
squirrel and go dig up your nuts.

The thread is here, where did I ask you for a cite? *Show us the request
that launched your distraction. *You cannot, it doesn't exist, just like
most of the fantasies pouring out of your (virtual) mouth.

It exists.

You're lying again.

I choose not to play your squirrelly little rodent games.

You cannot substantiate your lie so you devolve into insults.

"Other indicators: 1) Rage attacks after they realize you're questioning
their lies. 2) Distraction techniques, e.g. hanging up the phone when you
catch them in lie, playing word games, or even just running out of the
room. After using the distraction technique, or rage attack, or sometimes
both, they will pretend that nothing ever happened. They re-write history,
so it never did happen in their minds. Normal people do it too, but these
people take it to the extreme."
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_can_yo...hological_liar

Even if your nose lights up, Santa won't let you to chew on his
reindeer's nuts.

See above.

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bush Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

On Sep 22, 11:51*pm, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:06:20 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 22, 7:29*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:56:23 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 22, 3:13*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:29:51 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 21, 4:37*pm, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:15:36 -0700, almostcutmyhairtoday wrote:
On Sep 21, 1:32*pm, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:37:56 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:

How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his
social programs?

None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or
lack of, of Sarah Palin.

You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is.

What are you babbling about now? *I "asked for a cite"? *Where
do you see a request in this thread?

This is the cite you've asked for. *If you don't remember when
or where you asked for such a cite, that's your problem.

You're making **** up again, just like your twisted subject line..

Anyway, good luck with your tax evasion program.

You are a pathological liar:

Little squirrel, you're the one who said none of his wages will go
to Barack's social programs.

You're making **** up again. *You claimed that I asked for a cite.. *

That's another lie.

You're boring.

--
Regards, Curly

Sorry little squirrel, but it's all on google. *Now be a good little
squirrel and go dig up your nuts.

The thread is here, where did I ask you for a cite? *Show us the request
that launched your distraction. *You cannot, it doesn't exist, just like
most of the fantasies pouring out of your (virtual) mouth.

It exists.

You're lying again.

*I choose not to play your squirrelly little rodent games.

You cannot substantiate your lie so you devolve into insults.

Liar. I call you on your lies when you lie. There is no need to cite
your previous posting because that's what I'm replying to.

Sheesh! No wonder Argentina has coups and revolutions so
frequently...

"Other indicators: 1) Rage attacks after they realize you're questioning
their lies. 2) Distraction techniques, e.g. hanging up the phone when you
catch them in lie, playing word games, or even just running out of the
room. After using the distraction technique, or rage attack, or sometimes
both, they will pretend that nothing ever happened. They re-write history,
so it never did happen in their minds. Normal people do it too, but these
people take it to the extreme."http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_can_you_tell_if_someone_is_a_pathologic...

Lies by diversion.

Even if your nose lights up, Santa won't let you to chew on his
reindeer's nuts.

See above.

--
Regards, Curly

Troll.