On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:19:28 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Rigid or non-rigid?

Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.

The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.

Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.

Was it worth it? Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). :)

What's even funnier is the fact that I haven't a clue what you are talking
about ...

Which part - the spherical harmonic maps or the fact that I'm an
idiot? :)