"tankfixer" wrote in message
...
days?

Certainly.
Unless you think the 1st amendment doesn't cover modern methods of
publication or the 4th covers telephones.


well the republican's think that is the case. and some ultra-lefties think
the 2nd doesn't mean modern weapons.

but the fact is the FFs indulged in the dirtiest smear campaigns ever and
the weapons they allowed were state of the art military eeapons and people
even were allowed to own cannon.

In article , raymond-
says...

"tankfixer" wrote in message
...
days?

Certainly.
Unless you think the 1st amendment doesn't cover modern methods of
publication or the 4th covers telephones.


well the republican's think that is the case.

Projecting are you Ray ?

and some ultra-lefties think the 2nd doesn't mean modern weapons.

But not you ?


but the fact is the FFs indulged in the dirtiest smear campaigns ever and
the weapons they allowed were state of the art military eeapons and people
even were allowed to own cannon.

More than that they could own their own warship if they chose.

--
Meddle ye not in the Affairs of Dragons, for Thou art Crunchy and taste
Goode with Ketchup.

"tankfixer" wrote in message
...
In article , raymond-
says...

"tankfixer" wrote in message
...
days?

Certainly.
Unless you think the 1st amendment doesn't cover modern methods of
publication or the 4th covers telephones.


well the republican's think that is the case.

Projecting are you Ray ?


no paul i'm not.
the rightwingers are the book burners



and some ultra-lefties think the 2nd doesn't mean modern weapons.

But not you ?


nope, not me.




but the fact is the FFs indulged in the dirtiest smear campaigns ever and
the weapons they allowed were state of the art military eeapons and
people
even were allowed to own cannon.

More than that they could own their own warship if they chose.

yup

In article , raymond-
says...

"tankfixer" wrote in message
...
In article , raymond-
says...

"tankfixer" wrote in message
...
days?

Certainly.
Unless you think the 1st amendment doesn't cover modern methods of
publication or the 4th covers telephones.


well the republican's think that is the case.

Projecting are you Ray ?


no paul i'm not.

So you are against hate speach legislation ?

the rightwingers are the book burners

Only in your mind



and some ultra-lefties think the 2nd doesn't mean modern weapons.

But not you ?


nope, not me.




but the fact is the FFs indulged in the dirtiest smear campaigns ever and
the weapons they allowed were state of the art military eeapons and
people
even were allowed to own cannon.

More than that they could own their own warship if they chose.

yup




--
Meddle ye not in the Affairs of Dragons, for Thou art Crunchy and taste
Goode with Ketchup.

"tankfixer" wrote in message
...
Unless you think the 1st amendment doesn't cover modern methods of
publication or the 4th covers telephones.


well the republican's think that is the case.

Projecting are you Ray ?


no paul i'm not.

So you are against hate speach legislation ?


yes i am.




the rightwingers are the book burners

Only in your mind



and some ultra-lefties think the 2nd doesn't mean modern weapons.

But not you ?


nope, not me.




but the fact is the FFs indulged in the dirtiest smear campaigns ever
and
the weapons they allowed were state of the art military eeapons and
people
even were allowed to own cannon.

More than that they could own their own warship if they chose.

yup




--
Meddle ye not in the Affairs of Dragons, for Thou art Crunchy and taste
Goode with Ketchup.

On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:19:50 -0400, "Raymond O'Hara"
wrote:


"tankfixer" wrote in message
t...
days?

Certainly.
Unless you think the 1st amendment doesn't cover modern methods of
publication or the 4th covers telephones.


well the republican's think that is the case. and some ultra-lefties think
the 2nd doesn't mean modern weapons.

but the fact is the FFs indulged in the dirtiest smear campaigns ever and
the weapons they allowed were state of the art military eeapons and people
even were allowed to own cannon.


Raymond, would you please take 'rec.boats' off your cross posting list? It
would sure be appreciated. Thanks!

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:19:50 -0400, "Raymond O'Hara"
wrote:

"tankfixer" wrote in message
...
days?
Certainly.
Unless you think the 1st amendment doesn't cover modern methods of
publication or the 4th covers telephones.

well the republican's think that is the case. and some ultra-lefties think
the 2nd doesn't mean modern weapons.

but the fact is the FFs indulged in the dirtiest smear campaigns ever and
the weapons they allowed were state of the art military eeapons and people
even were allowed to own cannon.


Raymond, would you please take 'rec.boats' off your cross posting list? It
would sure be appreciated. Thanks!


Ray, John H. (Herring)wants to be sure there is enough bandwidth in the
rec.boats newsgroup for all the mindless off-topic crap *he* posts.

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:19:50 -0400, "Raymond O'Hara"
wrote:


"tankfixer" wrote in message
et...
days?

Certainly.
Unless you think the 1st amendment doesn't cover modern methods of
publication or the 4th covers telephones.


well the republican's think that is the case. and some ultra-lefties
think
the 2nd doesn't mean modern weapons.

but the fact is the FFs indulged in the dirtiest smear campaigns ever and
the weapons they allowed were state of the art military eeapons and people
even were allowed to own cannon.


Raymond, would you please take 'rec.boats' off your cross posting list? It
would sure be appreciated. Thanks!


how come you never say that to the right wingers?.

Raymond O'Hara wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:19:50 -0400, "Raymond O'Hara"
wrote:

"tankfixer" wrote in message
...
days?
Certainly.
Unless you think the 1st amendment doesn't cover modern methods of
publication or the 4th covers telephones.

well the republican's think that is the case. and some ultra-lefties
think
the 2nd doesn't mean modern weapons.

but the fact is the FFs indulged in the dirtiest smear campaigns ever and
the weapons they allowed were state of the art military eeapons and people
even were allowed to own cannon.

Raymond, would you please take 'rec.boats' off your cross posting list? It
would sure be appreciated. Thanks!


how come you never say that to the right wingers?.





Hehehe. Touche.

On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:23:46 -0400, "Raymond O'Hara"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:19:50 -0400, "Raymond O'Hara"
wrote:


"tankfixer" wrote in message
. net...
days?

Certainly.
Unless you think the 1st amendment doesn't cover modern methods of
publication or the 4th covers telephones.


well the republican's think that is the case. and some ultra-lefties
think
the 2nd doesn't mean modern weapons.

but the fact is the FFs indulged in the dirtiest smear campaigns ever and
the weapons they allowed were state of the art military eeapons and people
even were allowed to own cannon.


Raymond, would you please take 'rec.boats' off your cross posting list? It
would sure be appreciated. Thanks!


how come you never say that to the right wingers?.

I don't know any of you well enough to know the left or right wingers. I
don't care about your politics.

Whatever you are, you're correct. I'm just asking you to stop crossposting.

Please.