hk wrote:

:Fred J. McCall wrote:
: hk wrote:
:
: :Peter Skelton wrote:
: : On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:27:11 -0700, Fred J. McCall
: : wrote:
: :
: : Andrew Swallow wrote:
: :
: : :Jack Linthicum wrote:
: : :[snip]
: : :
: : :
: : : I would think that just talking about the act, and qualifying it with
: : : certain criteria, would be sufficient. If you own books and someone
: : : came to your place of residence and said certain of those books are
: : : not acceptable to them, what would be your reaction?
: : :
: : :The books Sarah Palin tried to ban will reveal a lot about her character
: : :and the real believes of her advisers .
: : :
: :
: : Now if only there was any evidence that she actually tried to ban
: : any...
: :
: : The evidence is that early in her term as mayor she tried to fire
: : a librarian who, some months earlier, had responded to a
: : hypothetical question about book banning in the negative. It was
: : not their only point of disagreement. After public pressure, she
: : backed down.
: :
: : There's lots there to yap about but not a hell of a lot of
: : significant substance.
: :
: :
: :"There's lots there to yap about but not a hell of a lot of
: : significant substance."
: :
: :Yep...that's Sarah Palin.
: :
:
: Why are you lot so terrified of her? For her being such a political
: lightweight, you guys sure are running scared. So far your assaults
: have done nothing but boost her, what with being so heavy on yap and
: so light on fact.
:
: You've all done a very good job of convincing me that there must be a
: lot more to like about her than I would otherwise have thought.,,
:
:
:My fear is that if by some fluke McCain is elected, he'll die in office
:and we'll have another simple-minded, religious idiot in the white
:house, like we have now.
:

Sorry, but that doesn't explain the level of venom and the lying
smears.

:
:Simple enough?
:

Yes, you're more than simple enough. And you're lying.

So why so afraid of a girl, sonny?

--
"You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of
your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear."
-- Mark Twain

On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:51:07 -0700, Fred J. McCall
wrote:

Fred, would you please consider responding to Harry only in the 'naval'
group. Or, better yet, ignore him completely?

Thanks!

John H wrote:

:On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:51:07 -0700, Fred J. McCall
:wrote:
:
:Fred, would you please consider responding to Harry only in the 'naval'
:group. Or, better yet, ignore him completely?
:

I'd rather you people kept your idiots home. Then I wouldn't see
them.

--
You are
What you do
When it counts.

Fred J. McCall wrote:
John H wrote:

:On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:51:07 -0700, Fred J. McCall
:wrote:
:
:Fred, would you please consider responding to Harry only in the 'naval'
:group. Or, better yet, ignore him completely?
:

I'd rather you people kept your idiots home. Then I wouldn't see
them.


We can't control where he posts. He's a narcissistic asshole and he
can't control what he does either. Sorry for the interruption.

On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:18:38 -0400, DK wrote:

Fred J. McCall wrote:
John H wrote:

:On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:51:07 -0700, Fred J. McCall
:wrote:
:
:Fred, would you please consider responding to Harry only in the 'naval'
:group. Or, better yet, ignore him completely?
:

I'd rather you people kept your idiots home. Then I wouldn't see
them.


We can't control where he posts. He's a narcissistic asshole and he
can't control what he does either. Sorry for the interruption.

Uh, Dan. Join us, please!

On Sep 8, 7:18*pm, DK wrote:
Fred J. McCall wrote:
John H wrote:

:On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:51:07 -0700, Fred J. McCall
:wrote:
:
:Fred, would you please consider responding to Harry only in the 'naval'
:group. Or, better yet, ignore him completely?
:

I'd rather you people kept your idiots home. *Then I wouldn't see
them.

We can't control where he posts. *He's a narcissistic asshole and he
can't control what he does either. *Sorry for the interruption.

Here is an option, please consider joining us to clean up the group:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...34881f48773a0#

It has been working pretty well today, see what happens after a
week.... read the whole thread, then make up your own mind

wrote:
On Sep 8, 7:18 pm, DK wrote:
Fred J. McCall wrote:
John H wrote:
:On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:51:07 -0700, Fred J. McCall
:wrote:
:
:Fred, would you please consider responding to Harry only in the 'naval'
:group. Or, better yet, ignore him completely?
:
I'd rather you people kept your idiots home. Then I wouldn't see
them.
We can't control where he posts. He's a narcissistic asshole and he
can't control what he does either. Sorry for the interruption.

Here is an option, please consider joining us to clean up the group:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...34881f48773a0#

It has been working pretty well today, see what happens after a
week.... read the whole thread, then make up your own mind

I don't read these posts all day long so I'm behind a bit.

I'm in.

John H wrote:
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:51:07 -0700, Fred J. McCall
wrote:

Fred, would you please consider responding to Harry only in the 'naval'
group. Or, better yet, ignore him completely?

Thanks!


I wonder why Herring is crossposting...again?