Fred J. McCall wrote:
hk wrote:

:Peter Skelton wrote:
: On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:27:11 -0700, Fred J. McCall
: wrote:
:
: Andrew Swallow wrote:
:
: :Jack Linthicum wrote:
: :[snip]
: :
: :
: : I would think that just talking about the act, and qualifying it with
: : certain criteria, would be sufficient. If you own books and someone
: : came to your place of residence and said certain of those books are
: : not acceptable to them, what would be your reaction?
: :
: :The books Sarah Palin tried to ban will reveal a lot about her character
: :and the real believes of her advisers .
: :
:
: Now if only there was any evidence that she actually tried to ban
: any...
:
: The evidence is that early in her term as mayor she tried to fire
: a librarian who, some months earlier, had responded to a
: hypothetical question about book banning in the negative. It was
: not their only point of disagreement. After public pressure, she
: backed down.
:
: There's lots there to yap about but not a hell of a lot of
: significant substance.
:
:
:"There's lots there to yap about but not a hell of a lot of
: significant substance."
:
:Yep...that's Sarah Palin.
:

Why are you lot so terrified of her? For her being such a political
lightweight, you guys sure are running scared. So far your assaults
have done nothing but boost her, what with being so heavy on yap and
so light on fact.

You've all done a very good job of convincing me that there must be a
lot more to like about her than I would otherwise have thought.,,



My fear is that if by some fluke McCain is elected, he'll die in office
and we'll have another simple-minded, religious idiot in the white
house, like we have now.

Simple enough?