![]() |
McCain up by 2 ;)
On the second day of the DNCC, Gallup has McCain up by two points.. I
can almost hear the Dems, saying polls don't count..;) The suit if falling off the hanger... snerk |
McCain up by 2 ;)
|
McCain up by 2 ;)
|
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Aug 26, 2:54*pm, hk wrote:
wrote: On the second day of the DNCC, Gallup has McCain up by two points.. I can almost hear the Dems, saying polls don't count..;) The suit if falling off the hanger... snerk I doubt you have the intellect or education to understand this: And on MSNBC this morning, Chuck Todd sounded off on the “likely voter” results that Gallup reports in its "tracking poll": “[Frank] Newport, editor of Gallup, a good pollster … even has a warning in USA Today this morning that says don’t believe the likely voter, follow the registered voter model. They report it anyway. … But the point is, is that this is — a good polling organization like Gallup, okay, these guys are in control of the gold standard of polling. They can’t figure it out. I think this is a warning to everybody that polling this year is very difficult. … Everything should be taken with a grain of salt.” Got that? The national polls are very flaky at the moment, and have been for a while. The state by state polls seem a lot more real. Spin it any way you want. Two days after the announcement of Biden, into the DNCC, and you are bouncing down,, it's a real good sign for America... |
McCain up by 2 ;)
|
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Aug 26, 3:11*pm, hk wrote:
wrote: On Aug 26, 2:54 pm, hk wrote: wrote: On the second day of the DNCC, Gallup has McCain up by two points.. I can almost hear the Dems, saying polls don't count..;) The suit if falling off the hanger... snerk I doubt you have the intellect or education to understand this: And on MSNBC this morning, Chuck Todd sounded off on the “likely voter” results that Gallup reports in its "tracking poll": “[Frank] Newport, editor of Gallup, a good pollster … even has a warning in USA Today this morning that says don’t believe the likely voter, follow the registered voter model. They report it anyway. … But the point is, is that this is — a good polling organization like Gallup, okay, these guys are in control of the gold standard of polling. They can’t figure it out. I think this is a warning to everybody that polling this year is very difficult. … Everything should be taken with a grain of salt.” Got that? The national polls are very flaky at the moment, and have been for a while. The state by state polls seem a lot more real. Spin it any way you want. Two days after the announcement of Biden, into the DNCC, and you are bouncing down,, it's a real good sign for America... If McCain wins, and he won't, come see us in a year or two and let us know how the McCain health insurance plan is working for you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - This is historic, three days into the DNCC and The Republicans are up by 2! Obama Bin Biden is a dud.. what more can go right;) |
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Aug 27, 6:11 am, wrote:
On Aug 26, 3:11 pm, hk wrote: wrote: On Aug 26, 2:54 pm, hk wrote: wrote: On the second day of the DNCC, Gallup has McCain up by two points.. I can almost hear the Dems, saying polls don't count..;) The suit if falling off the hanger... snerk I doubt you have the intellect or education to understand this: And on MSNBC this morning, Chuck Todd sounded off on the “likely voter” results that Gallup reports in its "tracking poll": “[Frank] Newport, editor of Gallup, a good pollster … even has a warning in USA Today this morning that says don’t believe the likely voter, follow the registered voter model. They report it anyway. … But the point is, is that this is — a good polling organization like Gallup, okay, these guys are in control of the gold standard of polling. They can’t figure it out. I think this is a warning to everybody that polling this year is very difficult. … Everything should be taken with a grain of salt.” Got that? The national polls are very flaky at the moment, and have been for a while. The state by state polls seem a lot more real. Spin it any way you want. Two days after the announcement of Biden, into the DNCC, and you are bouncing down,, it's a real good sign for America... If McCain wins, and he won't, come see us in a year or two and let us know how the McCain health insurance plan is working for you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - This is historic, three days into the DNCC and The Republicans are up by 2! Obama Bin Biden is a dud.. what more can go right;) Someone at work today said mcC is up by 6 instead of 2. i cain't (and won't) confirm, nor deny that to be true, though. |
McCain up by 2 ;)
Tim wrote:
Someone at work today said mcC is up by 6 instead of 2. i cain't (and won't) confirm, nor deny that to be true, though. The only important poll is conducted on the first Tuesday in Nov. but if Obama had a lead in the polls, can you imagine who would be cut and pasting the polling results on a daily basis? I was really surprised with Bill's speech last night, he was as good as he ever was. It really doesn't matter if you agree with Bill or not, he was able to deliver a great speech. If he was half as good during Billary's campaign as he was last night, she might have been the Dem's candidate. He sure was out of it during her campaign. Talk about sticking his foot in his mouth at every campaign stop. |
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:10:33 -0400, Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall,
Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote: The only important poll is conducted on the first Tuesday in Nov. but if Obama had a lead in the polls, can you imagine who would be cut and pasting the polling results on a daily basis? If you're interested, these two sites can keep you up to date. Election Projection, I believe, had McCain up last week. http://www.electionprojection.com/index.shtml http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...ama_vs_mccain/ |
McCain up by 2 ;)
"hk" wrote in message . .. Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was good and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters. I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. Eisboch |
McCain up by 2 ;)
wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:10:33 -0400, Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote: The only important poll is conducted on the first Tuesday in Nov. but if Obama had a lead in the polls, can you imagine who would be cut and pasting the polling results on a daily basis? If you're interested, these two sites can keep you up to date. Election Projection, I believe, had McCain up last week. http://www.electionprojection.com/index.shtml http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...ama_vs_mccain/ When it is as close as these polls show, there is no way anyone can predict the outcome, but Obama's trend is not a good sign for his campaign. He will have to do something different to get his message out to the independents or he will lose this election. |
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:59:46 -0400, hk wrote:
Torture this, Republican boy. http://tinyurl.com/o42at |
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Aug 28, 8:02*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was good and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters. I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. |
McCain up by 2 ;)
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was good and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters. I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. Eisboch Why? It's traditional and appropriate at that moment- the end of the speech at a convention - for the candidate's family to appear on stage. Besides, Biden, especially, has a compelling family story, as I am sure you know. A poster repeatedly posting photos of little clone grandchildren in a usenet boating discussion group or discussion board doesn't pass the "who gives a ****" test. It's not the same as posting photos of a handsome and clever dog. Dogs are always on topic. I can almost "smell" the GOP convention next week...plenty of talk about Jesus, an end to abortion, corporate entitlements, lies about how drilling will end our energy crisis, lower taxes for the deserving wealthy, "I was a POW for five years," and "he's an independent thinker" but of course he isn't. So...you're a Republican...what's your guess on the veep nom? -- No way, no how, no McCain! |
McCain up by 2 ;)
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was good and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters. I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. Eisboch I know Harry would think anyone proud that his children could procreate is stupid, but I think the way Biden handled the death of his wife, and how great his children are doing, should be very proud of them and his grandkids. I didn't know about Biden's wife dying soon after he was elected to Congress, but I could understand why he was so emotional looking back on his career, his life and his family. I don't agree with Biden's politics, but I am sure he is a great father and Opa and he has every right to be damn proud of those grandkids. |
McCain up by 2 ;)
|
McCain up by 2 ;)
hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was good and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters. I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. Eisboch Why? It's traditional and appropriate at that moment- the end of the speech at a convention - for the candidate's family to appear on stage. Besides, Biden, especially, has a compelling family story, as I am sure you know. A poster repeatedly posting photos of little clone grandchildren in a usenet boating discussion group or discussion board doesn't pass the "who gives a ****" test. It's not the same as posting photos of a handsome and clever dog. Dogs are always on topic. Poorly composed and exposed photos of an old stump and trash must also be appropriate to this NG. What did you think of that touching photo of Eisboch sitting and chatting with his son? |
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:11:21 -0700, justwaitafrekinminute wrote:
I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. Eisboch snerk kids are tools to guys like that.. Biden may have some warts, but his parenting skills are not in question. |
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Aug 28, 8:09*am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:10:33 -0400, Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. *wrote: The only important poll is conducted on the first Tuesday in Nov. but if Obama had a lead in the polls, can you imagine who would be cut and pasting the polling results on a daily basis? If you're interested, these two sites can keep you up to date. *Election Projection, I believe, had McCain up last week. http://www.electionprojection.com/index.shtml http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...ama_vs_mccain/ When it is as close as these polls show, there is no way anyone can predict the outcome, but Obama's trend is not a good sign for his campaign. *He will have to do something different to get his message out to the independents or he will lose this election. But he has no message. The Pelosi congress, the most corrupt congress in history has shown us what a far left leader and congress will do... It's funny they talk about gas going up 1.50 in the first 6-7 years of Bush, but don't mention it went up another 1.50 since the Pelosi premium kicked in... |
McCain up by 2 ;)
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was good and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters. I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. Eisboch Why? It's traditional and appropriate at that moment- the end of the speech at a convention - for the candidate's family to appear on stage. Besides, Biden, especially, has a compelling family story, as I am sure you know. So...you're a Republican...what's your guess on the veep nom? Wrong, ballot-breath. I am a registered nothing, consider myself an Independent, although certainly admit to right leaning tendencies on most issues. In some areas though, I am probably as liberal as you. gasp I have a bit of a hang-up about the concept of being a "registered" member of any political party. Doing so tends to make one accept and, by default, support platform issues that one otherwise may not be in agreement with. Lemmings. We saw that during the Dem's convention. Compromises of principles by all for the "common good" of the party. Past differences forgotten. Nope, not for me. I vote for the person who I think will best serve the best interests of the USA in national and international issues, not for the one who will best forward a political party's agenda, developed through political compromise and back room deals. Eisboch |
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:18:35 -0400, Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall,
Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote: I didn't know about Biden's wife dying soon after he was elected to Congress, but I could understand why he was so emotional looking back on his career, his life and his family. Not only his wife, but a young daughter was killed in that crash. |
McCain up by 2 ;)
|
McCain up by 2 ;)
|
McCain up by 2 ;)
|
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Aug 28, 8:25*am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: hk wrote: Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message m... Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was good and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters. I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. Eisboch Why? It's traditional and appropriate at that moment- the end of the speech at a convention - for the candidate's family to appear on stage. Besides, Biden, especially, has a compelling family story, as I am sure you know. A poster repeatedly posting photos of little clone grandchildren in a usenet boating discussion group or discussion board doesn't pass the "who gives a ****" test. It's not the same as posting photos of a handsome and clever dog. Dogs are always on topic. Poorly composed and exposed photos of an old stump and trash must also be appropriate to this NG. Don't forget the painted hoochie.. she should be out playing sports, not practicing her "pouty face" for some perv with a camera.. What did you think of that touching photo of Eisboch sitting and chatting with his son?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
McCain up by 2 ;)
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was good and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters. I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. Eisboch Why? It's traditional and appropriate at that moment- the end of the speech at a convention - for the candidate's family to appear on stage. Besides, Biden, especially, has a compelling family story, as I am sure you know. So...you're a Republican...what's your guess on the veep nom? Wrong, ballot-breath. I am a registered nothing, consider myself an Independent, although certainly admit to right leaning tendencies on most issues. In some areas though, I am probably as liberal as you. gasp I have a bit of a hang-up about the concept of being a "registered" member of any political party. Doing so tends to make one accept and, by default, support platform issues that one otherwise may not be in agreement with. Lemmings. We saw that during the Dem's convention. Compromises of principles by all for the "common good" of the party. Past differences forgotten. Nope, not for me. I vote for the person who I think will best serve the best interests of the USA in national and international issues, not for the one who will best forward a political party's agenda, developed through political compromise and back room deals. Eisboch You don't have to be "registered" to be a Republican or a Democrat. If you vote mostly Republican, you are a Republican. You vote mostly Republican, I am sure, especially for President. I am a registered Democrat. I haven't read through a Democratic party platform document in decades, probably not since 1970. I have no idea what is in this year's "platform," and I couldn't care less. My father in law is a lifelong registered Republican. I haven't asked him, but I suspect he has never ever read a GOP party platform document. So, what is your guess on the GOP veep? -- No way, no how, no McCain! |
McCain up by 2 ;)
|
McCain up by 2 ;)
hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was good and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters. I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. Eisboch Why? It's traditional and appropriate at that moment- the end of the speech at a convention - for the candidate's family to appear on stage. Besides, Biden, especially, has a compelling family story, as I am sure you know. So...you're a Republican...what's your guess on the veep nom? Wrong, ballot-breath. I am a registered nothing, consider myself an Independent, although certainly admit to right leaning tendencies on most issues. In some areas though, I am probably as liberal as you. gasp I have a bit of a hang-up about the concept of being a "registered" member of any political party. Doing so tends to make one accept and, by default, support platform issues that one otherwise may not be in agreement with. Lemmings. We saw that during the Dem's convention. Compromises of principles by all for the "common good" of the party. Past differences forgotten. Nope, not for me. I vote for the person who I think will best serve the best interests of the USA in national and international issues, not for the one who will best forward a political party's agenda, developed through political compromise and back room deals. Eisboch You don't have to be "registered" to be a Republican or a Democrat. If you vote mostly Republican, you are a Republican. You vote mostly Republican, I am sure, especially for President. I am a registered Democrat. I haven't read through a Democratic party platform document in decades, probably not since 1970. I have no idea what is in this year's "platform," and I couldn't care less. My father in law is a lifelong registered Republican. I haven't asked him, but I suspect he has never ever read a GOP party platform document. I think you completely missed the point that Eisboch was making. |
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Aug 28, 8:32*am, hk wrote:
wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:11:21 -0700, justwaitafrekinminute wrote: I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. Eisboch snerk kids are tools to guys like that.. Biden may have some warts, but his parenting skills are not in question.. * One of Biden's sons was elected and serves as attorney general of Delaware, and the other is a lawyer and member of the board of directors of Amtrak. I don't know what Ashley Biden, the daughter of Joe's second marriage does, but I am pretty sure she doesn't make obscene gestures into the camera when it is pointed at her. I wonder what Justwait's kids will do when they are older? Follow their father's example? I dunno, one of my kids is an accountant, the other works for a non- profit which tends to the poor, mostly folks from other countries and American Indians.. Oh, and travels the world, oh, and just finished her Masters.... Yup, as a stay home dad, I am pretty proud of my kids... even if they have fun here and there. They trust and love their parents.. |
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:38:42 -0400, hk wrote:
So, what is your guess on the GOP veep? Jeb Bush ;-) |
McCain up by 2 ;)
|
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Aug 28, 8:41*am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: hk wrote: Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message m... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message news:dtmdnW4FMIWtDivVnZ2dnUVZ_q3inZ2d@comcast. com... Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was good and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters.. I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. Eisboch Why? It's traditional and appropriate at that moment- the end of the speech at a convention - for the candidate's family to appear on stage. Besides, Biden, especially, has a compelling family story, as I am sure you know. So...you're a Republican...what's your guess on the veep nom? Wrong, ballot-breath. * *I am a registered nothing, *consider myself an Independent, although certainly admit to right leaning tendencies on most issues. *In some areas though, I am probably as liberal as you. *gasp I have a bit of a hang-up about the concept of being a "registered" member of any political party. *Doing so tends to make one accept and, by default, support platform issues that one otherwise may not be in agreement with. Lemmings. * We saw that during the Dem's convention. * Compromises of principles by all for the "common good" of the party. * Past differences forgotten. * *Nope, not for me. I vote for the person who I think will best serve the best interests of the USA in national and international issues, not for the one who will best forward a political party's agenda, developed through political compromise and back room deals. Eisboch You don't have to be "registered" to be a Republican or a Democrat. If you vote mostly Republican, you are a Republican. You vote mostly Republican, I am sure, especially for President. I am a registered Democrat. I haven't read through a Democratic party platform document in decades, probably not since 1970. I have no idea what is in this year's "platform," and I couldn't care less. My father in law is a lifelong registered Republican. I haven't asked him, but I suspect he has never ever read a GOP party platform document. I think you completely missed the point that Eisboch was making.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Really, I am registered repub, but have voted for more Democrats for pres, than repubs.. First off, I am an American... |
McCain up by 2 ;)
|
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:50:39 -0400, hk wrote:
wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:38:42 -0400, hk wrote: So, what is your guess on the GOP veep? Jeb Bush ;-) In this household, we never could figure why the Bush family passed over the smart son and pushed the stupid one into the White House. That would be funny, though...McCain and Bush, all over again. Seriously, if it weren't for his name, Jeb might not be a bad pick. |
McCain up by 2 ;)
"hk" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: I vote for the person who I think will best serve the best interests of the USA in national and international issues, not for the one who will best forward a political party's agenda, developed through political compromise and back room deals. Eisboch You don't have to be "registered" to be a Republican or a Democrat. If you vote mostly Republican, you are a Republican. You vote mostly Republican, I am sure, especially for President. In the past, I've voted both. I voted for Carter once and I voted for Clinton once. Does that surprise you? So, I don't consider myself a Republican or a Democrat. I simply vote for one or the other, depending on my modest judgement of who will best serve the national interests of the USA. One of the attractive qualities of Obama .... in fact maybe the *only* attractive quality .... is that a President Obama would probably be better equipped to salvage and repair our image abroad at the moment. Not to be pandering to forgein opinion, but in this day and age respect of the USA by others is important to our national interests, economy and security. I realize that and it's an important issue. Bush's policies, right or wrong, have pretty much demolished any international respect. On the other hand, Russia is flexing it's muscles again, taking full advantage of our current weaknesses and lack of international support. That also has me a bit concerned. I don't think academic diplomacy alone will nip it. The office of POTUS is more about leadership in a global environment than it is about detailed social policies at home, IMO. There are other bodies of elected representatives (Congress) that should be doing their job. As for McCain's VP pick? I really don't know. A couple of weeks ago I was thinking it would be Romney for sure, but I have a hunch that we may be in for a surprise. Eisboch |
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Aug 28, 9:06*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
hk wrote: I am a registered Democrat. I haven't read through a Democratic party platform document in decades, probably not since 1970. I have no idea what is in this year's "platform," and I couldn't care less. My father in law is a lifelong registered Republican. I haven't asked him, but I suspect he has never ever read a GOP party platform document. Question then: When you enter your voting booth, do you vote a straight Democratic ticket? Or, do you pick and choose, voting for a Republican here and there if you think the person running is better qualified. Honest answer only, please. Eisboch The words honest and Harry don't go hand in hand!!!! |
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:47:19 -0400, hk wrote:
wrote: On Aug 28, 8:32 am, hk wrote: wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:11:21 -0700, justwaitafrekinminute wrote: I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. Eisboch snerk kids are tools to guys like that.. Biden may have some warts, but his parenting skills are not in question. One of Biden's sons was elected and serves as attorney general of Delaware, and the other is a lawyer and member of the board of directors of Amtrak. I don't know what Ashley Biden, the daughter of Joe's second marriage does, but I am pretty sure she doesn't make obscene gestures into the camera when it is pointed at her. I wonder what Justwait's kids will do when they are older? Follow their father's example? I dunno, one of my kids is an accountant, the other works for a non- profit which tends to the poor, mostly folks from other countries and American Indians.. Oh, and travels the world, oh, and just finished her Masters.... Yup, as a stay home dad, I am pretty proud of my kids... even if they have fun here and there. They trust and love their parents.. So who were their parents? How *anyone* here can have any respect for you is totally beyond me. |
McCain up by 2 ;)
On Aug 28, 10:05*am, John H wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:47:19 -0400, hk wrote: wrote: On Aug 28, 8:32 am, hk wrote: wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:11:21 -0700, justwaitafrekinminute wrote: I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. Eisboch snerk kids are tools to guys like that.. Biden may have some warts, but his parenting skills are not in question. * One of Biden's sons was elected and serves as attorney general of Delaware, and the other is a lawyer and member of the board of directors of Amtrak. I don't know what Ashley Biden, the daughter of Joe's second marriage does, but I am pretty sure she doesn't make obscene gestures into the camera when it is pointed at her. I wonder what Justwait's kids will do when they are older? Follow their father's example? I dunno, one of my kids is an accountant, the other works for a non- profit which tends to the poor, mostly folks from other countries and American Indians.. Oh, and travels the world, oh, and just finished her Masters.... *Yup, as a stay home dad, I am pretty proud of my kids... even if they have fun here and there. They trust and love their parents.. So who were their parents? How *anyone* here can have any respect for you is totally beyond me.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I agree. There is no one as low of a scumbag as he is, and his lover/ clone JimH is trying VERY hard! |
McCain up by 2 ;)
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: I vote for the person who I think will best serve the best interests of the USA in national and international issues, not for the one who will best forward a political party's agenda, developed through political compromise and back room deals. Eisboch You don't have to be "registered" to be a Republican or a Democrat. If you vote mostly Republican, you are a Republican. You vote mostly Republican, I am sure, especially for President. In the past, I've voted both. I voted for Carter once and I voted for Clinton once. Does that surprise you? So, I don't consider myself a Republican or a Democrat. I simply vote for one or the other, depending on my modest judgement of who will best serve the national interests of the USA. One of the attractive qualities of Obama .... in fact maybe the *only* attractive quality .... is that a President Obama would probably be better equipped to salvage and repair our image abroad at the moment. Not to be pandering to forgein opinion, but in this day and age respect of the USA by others is important to our national interests, economy and security. I realize that and it's an important issue. Bush's policies, right or wrong, have pretty much demolished any international respect. On the other hand, Russia is flexing it's muscles again, taking full advantage of our current weaknesses and lack of international support. That also has me a bit concerned. I don't think academic diplomacy alone will nip it. The office of POTUS is more about leadership in a global environment than it is about detailed social policies at home, IMO. There are other bodies of elected representatives (Congress) that should be doing their job. As for McCain's VP pick? I really don't know. A couple of weeks ago I was thinking it would be Romney for sure, but I have a hunch that we may be in for a surprise. Eisboch Whatever Russia does, there's nothing in McCain's resume that indicate he will be equipped to deal with it. -- No way, no how, no McCain! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com