Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..

...do you own?

Things are obviously getting desperate in the DNC.

Eisboch
I think it reasonable for a presidential candidate to know how many houses
he and his wife own. I wonder if McCain knows what a half gallon of milk
or a dozen eggs sell for? I doubt it.


Neither do I. I haven't had a glass of milk or a real, home cooked egg in
about 3 years. So what?

Eisboch




You're not running for public office. Someone who is...should
Don't you go to the supermarket?

"hk" wrote in message
. ..


I think it reasonable for a presidential candidate to know how many
houses he and his wife own. I wonder if McCain knows what a half gallon
of milk or a dozen eggs sell for? I doubt it.



Neither do I. I haven't had a glass of milk or a real, home cooked egg
in about 3 years. So what?

Eisboch


You're not running for public office. Someone who is...should
Don't you go to the supermarket?



Very rarely. We don't have kids living in the house anymore. There's no
reason for me to be current with the price of a gallon of milk. So, I don't
have a clue, and I don't think it makes any difference if I were running for
public office or not.

I *do* know, based on conversations with my daughter who feeds two growing
boys with bottomless pits and my two sons' wives and their families that
food costs are going out of sight. I know pretty accurately how much they
all spend a week for food.

I think *that's* important to know, not an itemized grocery shopping list.

Ask McCain about the high cost of food. I think he has an idea.
Ask him how much a lb. of boloney costs and I won't hold it against him if
he doesn't have the current answer on the tip of his tongue.

This stupid stuff is nothing but political spin and frankly, it is an insult
to the intelligence of the American people.

Eisboch

On Aug 21, 5:32 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message

. ..

I think it reasonable for a presidential candidate to know how many
houses he and his wife own. I wonder if McCain knows what a half gallon
of milk or a dozen eggs sell for? I doubt it.
Neither do I. I haven't had a glass of milk or a real, home cooked egg
in about 3 years. So what?

Eisboch
You're not running for public office. Someone who is...should
Don't you go to the supermarket?

Very rarely. We don't have kids living in the house anymore. There's no
reason for me to be current with the price of a gallon of milk. So, I don't
have a clue, and I don't think it makes any difference if I were running for
public office or not.

I *do* know, based on conversations with my daughter who feeds two growing
boys with bottomless pits and my two sons' wives and their families that
food costs are going out of sight. I know pretty accurately how much they
all spend a week for food.

I think *that's* important to know, not an itemized grocery shopping list.

Ask McCain about the high cost of food. I think he has an idea.
Ask him how much a lb. of boloney costs and I won't hold it against him if
he doesn't have the current answer on the tip of his tongue.

This stupid stuff is nothing but political spin and frankly, it is an insult
to the intelligence of the American people.

Eisboch

Democrats always fall this cult of personality like they have done for
Obama..It is part of their pathology of wanting to be taken care of by
a father figure. Remember how many Dems thought papa Joe Stalin was
ok and they went into near depression when Krushev denounced him?
Remember how many Dems went gaga over Mao? They always do this
because the average Dem isnt smart enough to take care of himself so
they need an authority figure to tell them what to do.

wrote in message
...


Democrats always fall this cult of personality like they have done for
Obama..It is part of their pathology of wanting to be taken care of by
a father figure. Remember how many Dems thought papa Joe Stalin was
ok and they went into near depression when Krushev denounced him?
Remember how many Dems went gaga over Mao? They always do this
because the average Dem isnt smart enough to take care of himself so
they need an authority figure to tell them what to do.


Unfortunately, it's more. It's about power. Scaring the average guy,
promising him security and social welfare is a means of building it.

Personalities and individuals aside, I believe in a system whereby people
are guaranteed the opportunity to take care of themselves and their
families, to whatever level they aspire, in whatever legal means they
desire. Our social obligation is to provide for those that simply cannot,
for whatever physical or mental reason, do it for themselves.

It isn't perfect by any means, but we are obligated to continue working at
it.

One of my fears is that due to the rapid changes in the world today, the
global economy, the rise of the economic strength of other nations, that we
may be duped into the "security" mode of thinking and lose much of what this
country was founded on.


Eisboch

wrote in message
...

Democrats always fall this cult of personality like they have done for
Obama..It is part of their pathology of wanting to be taken care of by
a father figure. Remember how many Dems thought papa Joe Stalin was
ok and they went into near depression when Krushev denounced him?
Remember how many Dems went gaga over Mao? They always do this
because the average Dem isnt smart enough to take care of himself so
they need an authority figure to tell them what to do.


No offense, but that is the biggest crop of crap I have seen posted here
in a long, long time.

If you want political cult of personality in this country, look no
farther than Ronald Reagan, and the efforts of Republicans to name every
damned thing everywhere after him.

How many Democrats thought Stalin was OK? How many went gaga over Mao?
I'm old enough and educated enough to remember both of those guys, and I
recall reading many times that Roosevelt, the leading Democrat of his
time, had nothing but disdain for Stalin. His successor, Harry S Truman,
had no use for Stalin, either.

What you posted is bull**** piled upon bull**** piled upon bull****.

"hk" wrote in message
. ..

wrote in message
...

Democrats always fall this cult of personality like they have done for
Obama..It is part of their pathology of wanting to be taken care of by
a father figure. Remember how many Dems thought papa Joe Stalin was
ok and they went into near depression when Krushev denounced him?
Remember how many Dems went gaga over Mao? They always do this
because the average Dem isnt smart enough to take care of himself so
they need an authority figure to tell them what to do.


No offense, but that is the biggest crop of crap I have seen posted here
in a long, long time.

If you want political cult of personality in this country, look no farther
than Ronald Reagan, and the efforts of Republicans to name every damned
thing everywhere after him.

How many Democrats thought Stalin was OK? How many went gaga over Mao? I'm
old enough and educated enough to remember both of those guys, and I
recall reading many times that Roosevelt, the leading Democrat of his
time, had nothing but disdain for Stalin. His successor, Harry S Truman,
had no use for Stalin, either.

What you posted is bull**** piled upon bull**** piled upon bull****.




heh, heh, heh.

Got to ya, huh?

Consider this. That's how many of us feel about a lot of your posts.

Eisboch

On Aug 21, 6:24 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message

. ..





wrote in message
...

Democrats always fall this cult of personality like they have done for
Obama..It is part of their pathology of wanting to be taken care of by
a father figure. Remember how many Dems thought papa Joe Stalin was
ok and they went into near depression when Krushev denounced him?
Remember how many Dems went gaga over Mao? They always do this
because the average Dem isnt smart enough to take care of himself so
they need an authority figure to tell them what to do.

No offense, but that is the biggest crop of crap I have seen posted here
in a long, long time.

If you want political cult of personality in this country, look no farther
than Ronald Reagan, and the efforts of Republicans to name every damned
thing everywhere after him.

How many Democrats thought Stalin was OK? How many went gaga over Mao? I'm
old enough and educated enough to remember both of those guys, and I
recall reading many times that Roosevelt, the leading Democrat of his
time, had nothing but disdain for Stalin. His successor, Harry S Truman,
had no use for Stalin, either.

What you posted is bull**** piled upon bull**** piled upon bull****.

heh, heh, heh.

Got to ya, huh?

Consider this. That's how many of us feel about a lot of your posts.

Eisboch

We can start with Ayers, one of Obimbo's buddies. How about all the
Dems who like Castro and Chavez. How about the great mouthpiece of
the DNC, the NYT and their defense of Stalin by saying they saw no
famine in the Ukraine They even wond a Pulitzer for that one. All
those 60s radicals have mostly become Dems and they all loved Mao.
Remember, "I'd like to teach the world to sing, in perfect Mandarin,
with Uncle Ho, Chairman Mao, fidel and Madame Binh......."
Roosevelt and Truman would have nothing to do with the Dem party of
today. Even Kennedy was more right wing than McCain.

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
wrote in message
...

Democrats always fall this cult of personality like they have done for
Obama..It is part of their pathology of wanting to be taken care of by
a father figure. Remember how many Dems thought papa Joe Stalin was
ok and they went into near depression when Krushev denounced him?
Remember how many Dems went gaga over Mao? They always do this
because the average Dem isnt smart enough to take care of himself so
they need an authority figure to tell them what to do.

No offense, but that is the biggest crop of crap I have seen posted here
in a long, long time.

If you want political cult of personality in this country, look no farther
than Ronald Reagan, and the efforts of Republicans to name every damned
thing everywhere after him.

How many Democrats thought Stalin was OK? How many went gaga over Mao? I'm
old enough and educated enough to remember both of those guys, and I
recall reading many times that Roosevelt, the leading Democrat of his
time, had nothing but disdain for Stalin. His successor, Harry S Truman,
had no use for Stalin, either.

What you posted is bull**** piled upon bull**** piled upon bull****.




heh, heh, heh.

Got to ya, huh?

Consider this. That's how many of us feel about a lot of your posts.

Eisboch





It didn't get to me.

On Aug 21, 5:10 pm, hk wrote:


If you want political cult of personality in this country, look no
farther than Ronald Reagan, and the efforts of Republicans to name every
damned thing everywhere after him.


harry, I don't really know, but I'd imagine there's more thinks named
Kennedy than Reagan

not to mention Washington and Lincoln.