On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:17:49 -0700, "Mike" wrote:

Holy fat**** Batman, watch the Fat Boy dance! It only took him a week to
figure out a story to explain his "non-photoshop" lie, then he had to wait
for a spot to insert it. Now he's leaving "exif" trails. LOL Hell, he
didn't know what that was 'till a week ago.

Does he think anyone but himself believes this crap?

--Mike

Careful, you'll become dwarf number nineteen.

On Aug 11, 9:25*pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:17:49 -0700, "Mike" wrote:
Holy fat**** Batman, watch the Fat Boy dance! It only took him a week to
figure out a story to explain his "non-photoshop" lie, then he had to wait
for a spot to insert it. Now he's leaving "exif" trails. LOL Hell, he
didn't know what that was 'till a week ago.

Does he think anyone but himself believes this crap?

--Mike

Careful, you'll become dwarf number nineteen.

He already is. Number 9 that is. ;-)

JimH wrote:
On Aug 11, 9:25 pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:17:49 -0700, "Mike" wrote:
Holy fat**** Batman, watch the Fat Boy dance! It only took him a week to
figure out a story to explain his "non-photoshop" lie, then he had to wait
for a spot to insert it. Now he's leaving "exif" trails. LOL Hell, he
didn't know what that was 'till a week ago.
Does he think anyone but himself believes this crap?
--Mike
Careful, you'll become dwarf number nineteen.

He already is. Number 9 that is. ;-)



Mike is one of the alternate little schitts, fighting snaggletooth and
nail for Loogie's seat as the dumbest d.f. in here. It's close.

--
"The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade
and a woman's right to choose a safe and legal abortion,
regardless of ability to pay, and we oppose any and all efforts
to weaken or undermine that right."

One could only hope! I'd much rather be one of the dwarves, than one of the
stooges. g

--Mike

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:17:49 -0700, "Mike" wrote:

Holy fat**** Batman, watch the Fat Boy dance! It only took him a week to
figure out a story to explain his "non-photoshop" lie, then he had to wait
for a spot to insert it. Now he's leaving "exif" trails. LOL Hell, he
didn't know what that was 'till a week ago.

Does he think anyone but himself believes this crap?

--Mike

Careful, you'll become dwarf number nineteen.

Oh yeah... it took 25 edits with photoshop to crop that photo to a
headshot??? And he calls us stoopid....

--Mike

"Mike" wrote in message
...
One could only hope! I'd much rather be one of the dwarves, than one of
the stooges. g

--Mike

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:17:49 -0700, "Mike" wrote:

Holy fat**** Batman, watch the Fat Boy dance! It only took him a week to
figure out a story to explain his "non-photoshop" lie, then he had to
wait
for a spot to insert it. Now he's leaving "exif" trails. LOL Hell, he
didn't know what that was 'till a week ago.

Does he think anyone but himself believes this crap?

--Mike

Careful, you'll become dwarf number nineteen.

Mike wrote:
Oh yeah... it took 25 edits with photoshop to crop that photo to a
headshot??? And he calls us stoopid....

--Mike

"Mike" wrote in message
...
One could only hope! I'd much rather be one of the dwarves, than one of
the stooges. g

--Mike

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:17:49 -0700, "Mike" wrote:

Holy fat**** Batman, watch the Fat Boy dance! It only took him a week to
figure out a story to explain his "non-photoshop" lie, then he had to
wait
for a spot to insert it. Now he's leaving "exif" trails. LOL Hell, he
didn't know what that was 'till a week ago.

Does he think anyone but himself believes this crap?

--Mike

Careful, you'll become dwarf number nineteen.




Actually if Harry understood the "ETIF trail", he would understand that
that trail started with the original photographer and the way the
original photographer processed the photo. It didn't just start when he
downloaded the photo and then cropped it. Why anyone would use CS3 to
crop a photo I have no idea.

Either way, it was a **** poor "snapshot" of a pretty young lady, yet,
he held it up as an example of excellent photography.

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:18:22 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall,
Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:

Mike wrote:
Oh yeah... it took 25 edits with photoshop to crop that photo to a
headshot??? And he calls us stoopid....

--Mike

"Mike" wrote in message
...
One could only hope! I'd much rather be one of the dwarves, than one of
the stooges. g

--Mike

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:17:49 -0700, "Mike" wrote:

Holy fat**** Batman, watch the Fat Boy dance! It only took him a week to
figure out a story to explain his "non-photoshop" lie, then he had to
wait
for a spot to insert it. Now he's leaving "exif" trails. LOL Hell, he
didn't know what that was 'till a week ago.

Does he think anyone but himself believes this crap?

--Mike

Careful, you'll become dwarf number nineteen.




Actually if Harry understood the "ETIF trail", he would understand that
that trail started with the original photographer and the way the
original photographer processed the photo. It didn't just start when he
downloaded the photo and then cropped it. Why anyone would use CS3 to
crop a photo I have no idea.

Either way, it was a **** poor "snapshot" of a pretty young lady, yet,
he held it up as an example of excellent photography.

He held it up as an example of *his* excellent photography. If the photo
had been praised, and he'd not been 'caught', he'd surely be basking in the
glory.

Ditto with the Parker picture.

********************************************
"Actually, I am holding the camera. Guess I had it pointed the wrong way.
Well, it wasn't my camera...how was I to know?"
******************************************

Sure sounds like someone taking credit for a photograph.