"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Aug 11, 6:01 pm, "Jim" wrote:
I warned both of you.

Now it's done.

12 hours.

Don't drag your bull**** from here over there.

I mean it.

Good call.

Ya but the fat man only got 12 hours. Being a three time loser, he
should be
down for the count.

Tom actually understands what is going on over there and is doing a
great job cleaning the place up. First JohnH and then Reggie.

Nice job Tom and keep it up.

Why are you bringing 'over there' over here?

Because the fat man is binned over there.

Aren't you the only one who was *permanently* banned over there? ;-)

I was never banned over there.

"Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote in message
. ..
Jim wrote:

"Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
On Aug 11, 4:20 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:31:53 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of
Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC,



STP. " wrote:
HK wrote:
Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir
Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
There were a lot of boats at Saturday's Raft-Up,
Sorry, Reggie, but I don't post *my* photos here or at Chuck's place
anymore. Didn't you understand the joke, get the email or understand
the
laughing face? You should have looked more closely at the EXIF trail
I
left for you...
The post was an experiment, to see if even the most innocuous
boating
post would gather a few interesting responses about the boats and
the
activities. The experiment obviously failed. You and the other Seven
Little Schitts have nothing to post about boats here or anywhere
else,
and when someone does, you do your best to schitt on the post.
Sad, really.
Remember that photo of "someone's granddaughter," the one I said I
did
not photoshop, and you had apoplexy over? Well, I never claimed it
was
*my* granddaughter (it wasn't - I would never post photos of my kids
or
grandkids on the internet), and *I* didn't photoshop it, although I
did
use photoshop to crop it, that's all. The photo was exactly as I
found
it, except I reduced to a "head shot."
As always, have a really terrific day.
I'm sure Tom will ban me at Chuck's for trying to start up boating
discussions. But, hell, at least I am trying to get some
boating-related
discussions going. That is more than you and the other little
schitts do
Don't have an orgasm over this post. I happen to be using my mac at
the
moment with aperture 2, my preferred digital editing software, and
t'bird on this machine has no filters. You're still in the schittbox
on
my main desktop machine...so there is no need to respond if you
expect
me to see it.
Harry,
I am surprised that you would take someone else's photo and publish
it
on here as your own, that would be stealing intellectual property.
But
I can not figure out why Tom would ban you from the forum, unless he
thought it was an obvious troll.
I warned both of you.

Now it's done.

12 hours.

Don't drag your bull**** from here over there.

I mean it.

Good call.

I have to agree with you on this. I never should have taken the bait.


Reggie. It's unfortunate that he was able to suck you into his trap.
Krause needs to be permanently banned from Chuck's You are a victim and
Tom should not penalize you for Krause's bad behavior.

Tom made the call, I have no problem with it.

Yah I Know. I was just adding a little drama and support. ;-)

"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Aug 11, 5:03 pm, "Jim" wrote:
"Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote in
...



JimH wrote:
On Aug 11, 4:20 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:31:53 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of
Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC,

STP. " wrote:
HK wrote:
Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir
Reginald
P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
There were a lot of boats at Saturday's Raft-Up,
Sorry, Reggie, but I don't post *my* photos here or at Chuck's place
anymore. Didn't you understand the joke, get the email or understand
the
laughing face? You should have looked more closely at the EXIF trail
I
left for you...
The post was an experiment, to see if even the most innocuous
boating
post would gather a few interesting responses about the boats and
the
activities. The experiment obviously failed. You and the other Seven
Little Schitts have nothing to post about boats here or anywhere
else,
and when someone does, you do your best to schitt on the post.
Sad, really.
Remember that photo of "someone's granddaughter," the one I said I
did
not photoshop, and you had apoplexy over? Well, I never claimed it
was
*my* granddaughter (it wasn't - I would never post photos of my kids
or
grandkids on the internet), and *I* didn't photoshop it, although I
did
use photoshop to crop it, that's all. The photo was exactly as I
found
it, except I reduced to a "head shot."
As always, have a really terrific day.
I'm sure Tom will ban me at Chuck's for trying to start up boating
discussions. But, hell, at least I am trying to get some
boating-related
discussions going. That is more than you and the other little
schitts
do
Don't have an orgasm over this post. I happen to be using my mac at
the
moment with aperture 2, my preferred digital editing software, and
t'bird on this machine has no filters. You're still in the schittbox
on
my main desktop machine...so there is no need to respond if you
expect
me to see it.
Harry,
I am surprised that you would take someone else's photo and publish
it
on here as your own, that would be stealing intellectual property.
But
I can not figure out why Tom would ban you from the forum, unless he
thought it was an obvious troll.
I warned both of you.

Now it's done.

12 hours.

Don't drag your bull**** from here over there.

I mean it.

Good call.

I have to agree with you on this. I never should have taken the bait.

Reggie. It's unfortunate that he was able to suck you into his trap.
Krause
needs to be permanently banned from Chuck's You are a victim and Tom
should
not penalize you for Krause's bad behavior.

And to think that Richard stated recently that you never whine.

How funny.

Pass the popcorn.

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Jim" wrote in message

Ya but the fat man only got 12 hours. Being a three time loser, he should
be down for the count.

Go ahead...keep pushing Tom.........
He won't put up with the crap Chuck does.


Ooops, my mistake.
I understand Chuck had banned you for life.
My apologies and congratulations to Mr. Chuck.

Don White wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"Jim" wrote in message
Ya but the fat man only got 12 hours. Being a three time loser, he should
be down for the count.
Go ahead...keep pushing Tom.........
He won't put up with the crap Chuck does.


Ooops, my mistake.
I understand Chuck had banned you for life.
My apologies and congratulations to Mr. Chuck.




Really?

--
"The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade
and a woman's right to choose a safe and legal abortion,
regardless of ability to pay, and we oppose any and all efforts
to weaken or undermine that right."

On Aug 11, 8:06*pm, hk wrote:
Don White wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
.. .
"Jim" wrote in message
Ya but the fat man only got 12 hours. Being a three time loser, he should
be down for the count.
Go ahead...keep pushing Tom.........
He won't put up with the crap Chuck does.

Ooops, my mistake.
I understand Chuck had banned you for life.
My apologies and congratulations to Mr. Chuck.

Really?



He has found a way to continue posting there (not hard to do) under a
different handle despite the fact that he was banned at the other
place based on his childish and nasty behavior there.

wrote:
On Aug 11, 5:07 pm, JimH wrote:
On Aug 11, 4:50 pm, "Jim" wrote:





"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Aug 11, 4:20 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:31:53 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of
Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC,
STP. " wrote:
HK wrote:
Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald
P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
There were a lot of boats at Saturday's Raft-Up,
Sorry, Reggie, but I don't post *my* photos here or at Chuck's place
anymore. Didn't you understand the joke, get the email or understand
the
laughing face? You should have looked more closely at the EXIF trail I
left for you...
The post was an experiment, to see if even the most innocuous boating
post would gather a few interesting responses about the boats and the
activities. The experiment obviously failed. You and the other Seven
Little Schitts have nothing to post about boats here or anywhere else,
and when someone does, you do your best to schitt on the post.
Sad, really.
Remember that photo of "someone's granddaughter," the one I said I did
not photoshop, and you had apoplexy over? Well, I never claimed it was
*my* granddaughter (it wasn't - I would never post photos of my kids or
grandkids on the internet), and *I* didn't photoshop it, although I did
use photoshop to crop it, that's all. The photo was exactly as I found
it, except I reduced to a "head shot."
As always, have a really terrific day.
I'm sure Tom will ban me at Chuck's for trying to start up boating
discussions. But, hell, at least I am trying to get some
boating-related
discussions going. That is more than you and the other little schitts
do
Don't have an orgasm over this post. I happen to be using my mac at the
moment with aperture 2, my preferred digital editing software, and
t'bird on this machine has no filters. You're still in the schittbox on
my main desktop machine...so there is no need to respond if you expect
me to see it.
Harry,
I am surprised that you would take someone else's photo and publish it
on here as your own, that would be stealing intellectual property. But
I can not figure out why Tom would ban you from the forum, unless he
thought it was an obvious troll.
I warned both of you.
Now it's done.
12 hours.
Don't drag your bull**** from here over there.
I mean it.
Good call.
Ya but the fat man only got 12 hours. Being a three time loser, he should be
down for the count.
Tom actually understands what is going on over there and is doing a
great job cleaning the place up. First JohnH and then Reggie.

Nice job Tom and keep it up.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You forgot your lover, Harry.

Interesting...

"Tom actually understands what is going on over there and is doing a
great job cleaning the place up."

That's a stab at Chuck if I ever read one. I'm not surprised
considering the source.

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:07:38 -0700 (PDT), JimH wrote:

On Aug 11, 4:50 pm, "Jim" wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message

...
On Aug 11, 4:20 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:



On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:31:53 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of
Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC,
STP. " wrote:
HK wrote:
Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald
P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
There were a lot of boats at Saturday's Raft-Up,
Sorry, Reggie, but I don't post *my* photos here or at Chuck's place
anymore. Didn't you understand the joke, get the email or understand
the
laughing face? You should have looked more closely at the EXIF trail I
left for you...
The post was an experiment, to see if even the most innocuous boating
post would gather a few interesting responses about the boats and the
activities. The experiment obviously failed. You and the other Seven
Little Schitts have nothing to post about boats here or anywhere else,
and when someone does, you do your best to schitt on the post.
Sad, really.
Remember that photo of "someone's granddaughter," the one I said I did
not photoshop, and you had apoplexy over? Well, I never claimed it was
*my* granddaughter (it wasn't - I would never post photos of my kids or
grandkids on the internet), and *I* didn't photoshop it, although I did
use photoshop to crop it, that's all. The photo was exactly as I found
it, except I reduced to a "head shot."
As always, have a really terrific day.
I'm sure Tom will ban me at Chuck's for trying to start up boating
discussions. But, hell, at least I am trying to get some
boating-related
discussions going. That is more than you and the other little schitts
do
Don't have an orgasm over this post. I happen to be using my mac at the
moment with aperture 2, my preferred digital editing software, and
t'bird on this machine has no filters. You're still in the schittbox on
my main desktop machine...so there is no need to respond if you expect
me to see it.
Harry,
I am surprised that you would take someone else's photo and publish it
on here as your own, that would be stealing intellectual property. But
I can not figure out why Tom would ban you from the forum, unless he
thought it was an obvious troll.
I warned both of you.
Now it's done.
12 hours.
Don't drag your bull**** from here over there.
I mean it.
Good call.

Ya but the fat man only got 12 hours. Being a three time loser, he should be
down for the count.
Tom actually understands what is going on over there and is doing a
great job cleaning the place up. First JohnH and then Reggie.

Nice job Tom and keep it up.

Why are you bringing 'over there' over here?

What else is he going to do all day?

Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
HK wrote:
Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald
P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
There were a lot of boats at Saturday's Raft-Up,



Sorry, Reggie, but I don't post *my* photos here or at Chuck's place
anymore. Didn't you understand the joke, get the email or understand
the laughing face? You should have looked more closely at the EXIF
trail I left for you...

The post was an experiment, to see if even the most innocuous boating
post would gather a few interesting responses about the boats and the
activities. The experiment obviously failed. You and the other Seven
Little Schitts have nothing to post about boats here or anywhere else,
and when someone does, you do your best to schitt on the post.

Sad, really.

Remember that photo of "someone's granddaughter," the one I said I did
not photoshop, and you had apoplexy over? Well, I never claimed it was
*my* granddaughter (it wasn't - I would never post photos of my kids
or grandkids on the internet), and *I* didn't photoshop it, although I
did use photoshop to crop it, that's all. The photo was exactly as I
found it, except I reduced to a "head shot."

As always, have a really terrific day.

I'm sure Tom will ban me at Chuck's for trying to start up boating
discussions. But, hell, at least I am trying to get some
boating-related discussions going. That is more than you and the other
little schitts do

Don't have an orgasm over this post. I happen to be using my mac at
the moment with aperture 2, my preferred digital editing software, and
t'bird on this machine has no filters. You're still in the schittbox
on my main desktop machine...so there is no need to respond if you
expect me to see it.

Harry,
I am surprised that you would take someone else's photo and publish it
on here as your own, that would be stealing intellectual property. But
I can not figure out why Tom would ban you from the forum, unless he
thought it was an obvious troll.

He's a sick (really) POS. The "granddaughter" photo is kind of eerie.
You have to consider the fact that he dug that up and uploaded it to
photobucket for *some* purpose. An "experiment" it wasn't. He's a sick
individual.

Holy fat**** Batman, watch the Fat Boy dance! It only took him a week to
figure out a story to explain his "non-photoshop" lie, then he had to wait
for a spot to insert it. Now he's leaving "exif" trails. LOL Hell, he
didn't know what that was 'till a week ago.

Does he think anyone but himself believes this crap?

--Mike




"Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote in message
. ..
HK wrote:
Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
There were a lot of boats at Saturday's Raft-Up,



Sorry, Reggie, but I don't post *my* photos here or at Chuck's place
anymore. Didn't you understand the joke, get the email or understand the
laughing face? You should have looked more closely at the EXIF trail I
left for you...

The post was an experiment, to see if even the most innocuous boating
post would gather a few interesting responses about the boats and the
activities. The experiment obviously failed. You and the other Seven
Little Schitts have nothing to post about boats here or anywhere else,
and when someone does, you do your best to schitt on the post.

Sad, really.

Remember that photo of "someone's granddaughter," the one I said I did
not photoshop, and you had apoplexy over? Well, I never claimed it was
*my* granddaughter (it wasn't - I would never post photos of my kids or
grandkids on the internet), and *I* didn't photoshop it, although I did
use photoshop to crop it, that's all. The photo was exactly as I found
it, except I reduced to a "head shot."

As always, have a really terrific day.

I'm sure Tom will ban me at Chuck's for trying to start up boating
discussions. But, hell, at least I am trying to get some boating-related
discussions going. That is more than you and the other little schitts do

Don't have an orgasm over this post. I happen to be using my mac at the
moment with aperture 2, my preferred digital editing software, and t'bird
on this machine has no filters. You're still in the schittbox on my main
desktop machine...so there is no need to respond if you expect me to see
it.

Harry,
I am surprised that you would take someone else's photo and publish it on
here as your own, that would be stealing intellectual property. But I can
not figure out why Tom would ban you from the forum, unless he thought it
was an obvious troll.