wrote:
On Aug 2, 7:30 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Aug 2, 7:25 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Aug 2, 7:14 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 18:58:53 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
Remembering some advice that a pro told me once, I suggested
that she stop trying to get the *perfect* shot, and just take a gazillion of
them, as fast as the camera would process the previous.
I think you get much more interesting and natural pictures that way,
particularly portraits, and they don't have that "posed" look.
Digital makes that more practical now. It was much more expensive
with film. I know (-:
But I took the middle ground, maybe shooting 3 more times than the
average amateur, and those 2nd or 3rd shots were usually the keepers.
--Vic
I do get a kick out of you guys talking to wafa about something post
after post he proves he knows nothing about.. But do go on, it's funny
to watch him change feet..
Well, let's start a discussion about something you know nothing
about...the construction of quality wood boats.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Sure, I will put my skills against yours any day:
http://trip-reports.com/coppermine/t...ls.php?album=9
have at it...
Please...I have no interest in little stitch and glue plywood skiffs.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, if I were you I wouldn't want to come up against me in the
wooden boat field either... No problem, go back to trying to fool
those who don't know the difference...


As far as can be told from what you have posted on your site and
elsewhere, you've never built anything but little skiffs and a couple of
really ugly canoes. The guys in my old man's shop built better and
better-looking wooden boats over the Connecticut winters, and they
weren't bitty little skiffs, Mr. Stitch and Glue.

Let's see some *substantial* boat you have built *not* using stitch and
glue.