On Aug 1, 11:28*am, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:27:47 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:







"hk" wrote in message
...

Shop wherever the hell you want. Free choice in shopping is fine if the
"public" has the ability to have influence on how its area is developed.
In our part of our rural, conservative county, we have an older Wal-Mart
store (that I've never been in), but we stopped Wal-Mart dead in its
tracks with its plans to built a "super Wal-Mart" in our area. Wal-Mart
spent a ton of money on PR and political bribes to force it way. All it
took to defeat Wal-Mart was a number of petitions signed by enough voters
to let the county pols know they'd be out on their asses if they approved
building the new store.

Your neighbors on fixed or limited incomes thank you.

Eisboch

Harry (WAFA), being the hypocrite that he is, surely does not want any
neighbors like that.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

How would you know? What we do know is wafa will take one side of an
issue today, and another tomorrow, as long as he can **** you all
off.. Like I have said before, I can't see why anyone would bother
debating someone who is not going to debate honestly? It just makes no
sense... You could have more fun debating yourself, and at least then
it wouldn't get personal or vulgar which you know is the eventual
outcome of any debate with our stooges...