"DK" wrote in message
...
Jim wrote:

"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Jul 14, 4:30 pm, "Jim" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

JimH wrote:
Hey Tom!

================================================== ======

On 7/13/08 7:41 PM, xxxx wrote:

I am thinking about purchasing a Parker 2100.

Is the splash board standard or an option?

Thanks!

================================================== =======

----- Original Message -----
From: Robin Parker
To: xxxx
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 1:29 PM
Subject: Question

A splashboard is an option. It is attached to the port and starboard
jump seats and is removable.

Sincerely,
Robin Parker
Marketing/Dealer Support


================================================== =========

Yep. And when my dealer asked if I wanted the splashboard, I said
"delete
that option."

I also "deleted" the seats in the vee of the bow, and I opted for two
swivel seats abaft the center console instead of a leaning post.

There was a fairly long list of stuff to accept or delete, some at no
cost, some at additional charges, and some for a credit against the
total.

My god man. That console and helm was designed for the leaning post. It
was
you who screwed up, not Parker. And I'll bet they tried to talk you out
of
that pontoon boat style top too. And you deleted the splash board to
boot.
You are your own worst enemy.

Doh! Why would a manufacturer list something as an option that would
put a boat in danger of sinking if not installed?

Eh? ;-)

JimH you got the Harry accent down pat. Eh? indeed.

WAFA and his two stooges are a *tight* group. I'm sure they conspire in
email to keep the dumb one on the same page.

Conspire this, tight boy!

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

Eisboch wrote:

Hey, it *is* boating related.

Eisboch
Indeed, but he doesn't seem to know anything.


Jim's having a little fun here as a break from growing bananas.
"Growing" .... not "going".

Anyhoo, despite your doubts, he knows more about boats than most others
in the NG, including me. He's just bashful about his knowledge.

Eisboch
He works very hard at keeping it secret.

That's because he's here to roll in the mud...not help the overall tone of
the group.
What kind of boatman waits till the middle of july to dig his boat out of
moth balls. Rhetorical. We already know the answer.
Once we get rid of three sour notes the tone will be sweet.

Jim wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

Eisboch wrote:

Hey, it *is* boating related.

Eisboch
Indeed, but he doesn't seem to know anything.


Jim's having a little fun here as a break from growing bananas.
"Growing" .... not "going".

Anyhoo, despite your doubts, he knows more about boats than most
others in the NG, including me. He's just bashful about his knowledge.

Eisboch
He works very hard at keeping it secret.

That's because he's here to roll in the mud...not help the overall
tone of the group.
What kind of boatman waits till the middle of july to dig his boat out
of moth balls. Rhetorical. We already know the answer.
Once we get rid of three sour notes the tone will be sweet.


What is going to get rid of the stench you create with virtually every
post you plop here?

Hey...how's that old, clapped out, underpowered, and now completely
p.o.s. boat of yours? Do you still have it, or just the photo of it?

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:19:36 -0400, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:05:58 -0400, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..

Most of what you fellows do, 24-7, is either fling juvenile insults,
discuss subjects that have nothing to do with any aspect or boating, or
act like idiots.

Because of you and your dwarfs, I simply gave up on this place as a
forum for boating discussions, and I freely admit I show up mainly to
watch the aberrant behavior of you and your buddies.

If all you did was "watch", a good chunk of the problem would go away.
You don't "watch". You (and others) pounce upon certain individuals
regardless of the subject of their posts or to whom they are addressed.

The only way to restore rec.boats to something other than a personal
insult free-for-all would be for everybody to retire the past, forget
about old issues and conflicts, and post as if all were meeting for the
first time. Problem is, it would require 100% participation and that just
isn't going to happen.

Eisboch



tell you what, Richard, as an old Westvillian to an aging Amityite, you
work assiduously on getting the seven dwarfs to behave and I'll work on
the rest.

how's that?

No thanks. It would be like trying to solve a Catch-22.

*I* can't fix it. *You* can't fix it. But if all the participants were
seriously motivated and committed to reviving rec.boats to it's former
glory, it can be done by simply resisting the urge to post idiotic
claims/counterclaims.

It can't be "my" rules .... "your" rules or anybody else's "rules".

Eisboch



Well, then, I go back to my original post on this to you...that as a
boating newsgroup, this place is lost, and that I show up mainly to
watch the aberrant behavior of the seven dwarfs and (as you mentioned)
to crap on one of their heads from time to time.

None of the seven, so far as I can tell, has the slightest interest in
boating related subjects or, if they do, they seem incapable of making
any but the most empty headed of posts (e.g., I took my kid wakeboarding
yesterday, or, I took my 93 grandchildren on a cruise).

So...



Harry, your statement, "I show up mainly to watch aberrant behavior...", is
belied by the sheer quantity of attack posts you make here.

I am willing to make you a deal. I will make no posts on Chuck's Island if
you make no more than one more post here, in answer to this one.

Look what you'd have to gain!

Deal.

Not that you had anything to add, boating-wise, there or here.

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:19:36 -0400, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:05:58 -0400, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..

Most of what you fellows do, 24-7, is either fling juvenile insults,
discuss subjects that have nothing to do with any aspect or boating, or
act like idiots.

Because of you and your dwarfs, I simply gave up on this place as a
forum for boating discussions, and I freely admit I show up mainly to
watch the aberrant behavior of you and your buddies.

If all you did was "watch", a good chunk of the problem would go away.
You don't "watch". You (and others) pounce upon certain individuals
regardless of the subject of their posts or to whom they are addressed.

The only way to restore rec.boats to something other than a personal
insult free-for-all would be for everybody to retire the past, forget
about old issues and conflicts, and post as if all were meeting for the
first time. Problem is, it would require 100% participation and that just
isn't going to happen.

Eisboch



tell you what, Richard, as an old Westvillian to an aging Amityite, you
work assiduously on getting the seven dwarfs to behave and I'll work on
the rest.

how's that?

No thanks. It would be like trying to solve a Catch-22.

*I* can't fix it. *You* can't fix it. But if all the participants were
seriously motivated and committed to reviving rec.boats to it's former
glory, it can be done by simply resisting the urge to post idiotic
claims/counterclaims.

It can't be "my" rules .... "your" rules or anybody else's "rules".

Eisboch


Well, then, I go back to my original post on this to you...that as a
boating newsgroup, this place is lost, and that I show up mainly to
watch the aberrant behavior of the seven dwarfs and (as you mentioned)
to crap on one of their heads from time to time.

None of the seven, so far as I can tell, has the slightest interest in
boating related subjects or, if they do, they seem incapable of making
any but the most empty headed of posts (e.g., I took my kid wakeboarding
yesterday, or, I took my 93 grandchildren on a cruise).

So...


Harry, your statement, "I show up mainly to watch aberrant behavior...", is
belied by the sheer quantity of attack posts you make here.

I am willing to make you a deal. I will make no posts on Chuck's Island if
you make no more than one more post here, in answer to this one.

Look what you'd have to gain!
Deal.

Not that you had anything to add, boating-wise, there or here.



What are you trying to prove with these repetitive regurgitations of
yours, Herring? That you still don't have anything to add?

You've proved that.

Stick to what you know...posting photos of your cloned grandchildren,
your diaperboat cruises, and your requests for golfing partners.

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:19:36 -0400, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
snipped

Harry, your statement, "I show up mainly to watch aberrant behavior...", is
belied by the sheer quantity of attack posts you make here.

I am willing to make you a deal. I will make no posts on Chuck's Island if
you make no more than one more post here, in answer to this one.

Look what you'd have to gain!

Deal.

Not that you had anything to add, boating-wise, there or here.

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:19:36 -0400, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
snipped
Harry, your statement, "I show up mainly to watch aberrant behavior...", is
belied by the sheer quantity of attack posts you make here.

I am willing to make you a deal. I will make no posts on Chuck's Island if
you make no more than one more post here, in answer to this one.

Look what you'd have to gain!
Deal.

Not that you had anything to add, boating-wise, there or here.



I interpreted your post to mean no more than one post to the thread
under discussion, crap-for-brains.

Your interpretation seems to be different.

Hey...post on Chuck's if you like. I don't care. You'll just get banned
again.

- - -

Two Republican "Oilmen" in the White House x Two Terms = $4.00+ a Gallon
for Gasoline at the Pump.

"HK" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:19:36 -0400, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:05:58 -0400, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..

Most of what you fellows do, 24-7, is either fling juvenile
insults, discuss subjects that have nothing to do with any aspect
or boating, or act like idiots.

Because of you and your dwarfs, I simply gave up on this place as
a forum for boating discussions, and I freely admit I show up
mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of you and your buddies.

If all you did was "watch", a good chunk of the problem would go
away. You don't "watch". You (and others) pounce upon certain
individuals regardless of the subject of their posts or to whom
they are addressed.

The only way to restore rec.boats to something other than a
personal insult free-for-all would be for everybody to retire the
past, forget about old issues and conflicts, and post as if all
were meeting for the first time. Problem is, it would require 100%
participation and that just isn't going to happen.

Eisboch



tell you what, Richard, as an old Westvillian to an aging Amityite,
you work assiduously on getting the seven dwarfs to behave and I'll
work on the rest.

how's that?

No thanks. It would be like trying to solve a Catch-22.

*I* can't fix it. *You* can't fix it. But if all the
participants were seriously motivated and committed to reviving
rec.boats to it's former glory, it can be done by simply resisting
the urge to post idiotic claims/counterclaims.

It can't be "my" rules .... "your" rules or anybody else's "rules".

Eisboch

Well, then, I go back to my original post on this to you...that as a
boating newsgroup, this place is lost, and that I show up mainly to
watch the aberrant behavior of the seven dwarfs and (as you mentioned)
to crap on one of their heads from time to time.

None of the seven, so far as I can tell, has the slightest interest in
boating related subjects or, if they do, they seem incapable of making
any but the most empty headed of posts (e.g., I took my kid
wakeboarding yesterday, or, I took my 93 grandchildren on a cruise).

So...


Harry, your statement, "I show up mainly to watch aberrant
behavior...", is
belied by the sheer quantity of attack posts you make here.

I am willing to make you a deal. I will make no posts on Chuck's Island
if
you make no more than one more post here, in answer to this one.

Look what you'd have to gain!
Deal.

Not that you had anything to add, boating-wise, there or here.



What are you trying to prove with these repetitive regurgitations of
yours, Herring? That you still don't have anything to add?

You've proved that.

Stick to what you know...posting photos of your cloned grandchildren, your
diaperboat cruises, and your requests for golfing partners.

What he has proved with your help is that you are not a man of your word.
John has kept his part of the agreement as an honorable person would do.
You, however, have shown us again that your word is worthless. Add to that
your compulsive lying and fabrication and you have the ingredients of WAFA.
Also known as Harry Krause.

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:19:36 -0400, HK wrote:



Well, then, I go back to my original post on this to you...that as a
boating newsgroup, this place is lost, and that I show up mainly to
watch the aberrant behavior of the seven dwarfs and (as you mentioned)
to crap on one of their heads from time to time.

None of the seven, so far as I can tell, has the slightest interest in
boating related subjects or, if they do, they seem incapable of making
any but the most empty headed of posts (e.g., I took my kid wakeboarding
yesterday, or, I took my 93 grandchildren on a cruise).

So...



Harry, your statement, "I show up mainly to watch aberrant behavior...", is
belied by the sheer quantity of attack posts you make here.

I am willing to make you a deal. I will make no posts on Chuck's Island if
you make no more than one more post here, in answer to this one.

Look what you'd have to gain!

Deal.

Not that you had anything to add, boating-wise, there or here.

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:19:36 -0400, HK wrote:


Well, then, I go back to my original post on this to you...that as a
boating newsgroup, this place is lost, and that I show up mainly to
watch the aberrant behavior of the seven dwarfs and (as you mentioned)
to crap on one of their heads from time to time.

None of the seven, so far as I can tell, has the slightest interest in
boating related subjects or, if they do, they seem incapable of making
any but the most empty headed of posts (e.g., I took my kid wakeboarding
yesterday, or, I took my 93 grandchildren on a cruise).

So...


Harry, your statement, "I show up mainly to watch aberrant behavior...", is
belied by the sheer quantity of attack posts you make here.

I am willing to make you a deal. I will make no posts on Chuck's Island if
you make no more than one more post here, in answer to this one.

Look what you'd have to gain!
Deal.

Not that you had anything to add, boating-wise, there or here.



D'oh...there he goes again.


That's what I did, braindead...I made one more post "here," in answer to
your "deal." I interpreted "here" to mean the thread in which you
offered your deal, and nothing more than that. Perhaps if your language
skills were better, you would have worded your deal more clearly.

Move on, braindead...you're getting nowhere with this one.

Where are your fellow dwarfs...I'm sure they'll take your side and make
you feel better.