Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David" dh@. wrote in message ... I've got an old boat very much like this one: http://www.warnersdock.com/images/Fr...fores15yel.JPG snip THIS is top-heavy: http://images.thebiggestbreasts.com/...fake_boobs.jpg Caution: nudity. Adults only please. -- Gregory Hall |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:34:39 -0100, David dh@. wrote:
I've got an old boat very much like this one: http://www.warnersdock.com/images/Fr...fores15yel.JPG that I'm trying to make into a mini-houseboat, sort of like a camper. I only expect to have about 200-300 pounds in the roof and walls, and the roof will only be about 48" above the gunwale. The hull will weigh a *lot* more than what is added, so shouldn't that alone be enough to keep it from being top heavy and flipping over? If I add weight, like a couple hundred pound bags of sand down in the hull to counterballance, shouldn't that take care of it? If so, should they be placed on the sides, or in the center? Use a tent! The thing will add only 20lbs to the boat, is easy to remove, and can be configured all kinds of ways. Check LLBean for a tent that will fit. Put a couple thermarest mattresses on the deck and you're good to go. |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Holy shi** g
--Mike "Gregory Hall" wrote in message ... "David" dh@. wrote in message ... I've got an old boat very much like this one: http://www.warnersdock.com/images/Fr...fores15yel.JPG snip THIS is top-heavy: http://images.thebiggestbreasts.com/...fake_boobs.jpg Caution: nudity. Adults only please. -- Gregory Hall |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David,
Get a book on Naval Architecture and read about GM. Every boat has the center of gravity above the center of buoyancy. Weight added alone might not keep it upright. Matt Colie David wrote: I've got an old boat very much like this one: http://www.warnersdock.com/images/Fr...fores15yel.JPG that I'm trying to make into a mini-houseboat, sort of like a camper. I only expect to have about 200-300 pounds in the roof and walls, and the roof will only be about 48" above the gunwale. The hull will weigh a *lot* more than what is added, so shouldn't that alone be enough to keep it from being top heavy and flipping over? If I add weight, like a couple hundred pound bags of sand down in the hull to counterbalance, shouldn't that take care of it? If so, should they be placed on the sides, or in the center? |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike" wrote in message ... Holy shi** g --Mike "Gregory Hall" wrote in message ... "David" dh@. wrote in message ... I've got an old boat very much like this one: http://www.warnersdock.com/images/Fr...fores15yel.JPG snip THIS is top-heavy: http://images.thebiggestbreasts.com/...fake_boobs.jpg Caution: nudity. Adults only please. -- Gregory Hall LOL, is that a look of pain on her face |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike wrote:
Holy shi** g Yes indeed! Amazing what they can with modern plastics ;-) THIS is top-heavy: http://images.thebiggestbreasts.com/...fake_boobs.jpg Caution: nudity. Adults only please. |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David wrote:
I've got an old boat very much like this one: http://www.warnersdock.com/images/Fr...fores15yel.JPG that I'm trying to make into a mini-houseboat, sort of like a camper. I only expect to have about 200-300 pounds in the roof and walls, and the roof will only be about 48" above the gunwale. The hull will weigh a *lot* more than what is added, so shouldn't that alone be enough to keep it from being top heavy and flipping over? If I add weight, like a couple hundred pound bags of sand down in the hull to counterballance, shouldn't that take care of it? If so, should they be placed on the sides, or in the center? Well, boat stability is a complex subject. Here some loose thoughts (before my first cup of coffee, so no guarantees that I get all things right. I'm sure others will jump on the chance to correct my worst blunders - maybe I can learn something too!) I would recommend you read a bit more about it. The "Nature of Boats" by Dave Gerr is a good all-around introduction, and doesn't get too technical. Many other books work as well. When you add weight and windage high up, you reduce the stability. That increases the risk that your boat will capsize in high seas (or even in flat water). It also changes the way the boat rolls in seas, which may make it more or less comfortable to be inside. You are right, you can compensate by adding weight (as low as possible!). This will make the boat sit deeper in the water. Maybe too deep. It all depends what you are going to use the boat for. With a solid house on it, and enough ballast to keep her upright, she will not want to plane. If you can live with moving her at hull speed (a few knots), you can make do with *much* smaller engine, and use the weight difference as ballast. If you do not plan to move her around much at all, then you can afford to load he a bit deeper, as the sailing characteristics won't matter. You can probably get an idea of the stability by doing a simple roll period test. Rock the boat sideways, it will settle on some speed of rolling from side to side. If this roll time (in seconds) is the same as your overall beam (in meters), (or 10% more), you have what Gerr describes a good initial stability. If the boar rolls much faster, you have more (initial) stability for good comfort - that would be good news for you. If, after all the construction, your boat rolls slower than this, you may want to add some ballast. In any case, keep the structure as low as you can manage, and build it light! It looks like a small boat to begin with, so don't even try to build a large house on her. Keep it small and simple, and might work well. Remember that a boat is always a compromise. A heavily modified boat is a compromise between the original compromiseand a your new ideas. It is your own boat, and it is you who will have to live with it. Don't let us naysayers put you completely off. But watch out, it is also your own life you are risking, and possibly your dear ones as well! Good luck! -Heikki |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt,
Haven't heard from you in a while. Nice to have you back. I remember that you knew my boat in her previous life. Take a look at her now http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Boat.htm Have you heard anything about the previous owners? Last I talked to them, one was having some medical issues and they weren't sure if they were going to be able to go cruising. I've now lost contact. Container ships sometimes have a slight negative GM, or used to 30 years ago when we would watch them come down the harbor with a slight list, make the turn, flop over, and continue on to sea with a slight list the other way. They have enough freeboard and flare in the ends that the righting arms would go positive after a couple degrees of heel. This loading made for minimal rolling and least strain on the upper layers of boxes. You can only get away with this in a very large ship though. The mini houseboat fellow won't get very far trying to apply what he reads about GM in a standard textbook to his problem. He should weight a sheet of plywood or get it's weight, calculate how much he needs to make the cabin, add about 50% for framing and other stuff, and then add the estimated weight of anything else he plans to put on board. Next put a table on board with the legs propped up a bit to get the top to about 75% of the cabin height. Pile the table with the estimated weight and go aboard. If the motion feels drunken and sluggish with very slow rools, the boat will probably be uncomfortable as well as dangerous. Keep removing weight from the table until a couple of people can walk around with the boat feeling solid and the rail getting close to the water. Then figure if he can build a cabin within that weight allowance. Strong winds are another issue but it sounds like this is a lake boat to spend most of its time on a mooring. -- Roger Long |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger,
I like both your practical answer and your pictures. You're cruising my old stomping (sailing) ground. I do miss the coast. Tom had recovered well and was looking good last time I spoke to him. I'll send him the URL to your pictures. I was kind of hoping that this guy would get the plan that there is a whole lot to know before his question could be answered effectively. A tanker I was 2AE on had a negative GM and a slight port on the way out. Every wave made it snap to Stbd, stall a couple of seconds and snap back. It was all a guy could do to stay on his feet. We did lose the fire in one boiler, but the FM lit it off the bricks. My chief called the bridge and told them if they tried to make for sea this way, he would shut them down. - They believed him, but he still had to listen to a bunch of griping because we lost two hours while they finished correcting the ballast. Matt |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 4, 10:46*am, Matt Colie wrote:
Roger, I like both your practical answer and your pictures. You're cruising my old stomping (sailing) ground. *I do miss the coast. Tom had recovered well and was looking good last time I spoke to him. I'll send him the URL to your pictures. I was kind of hoping that this guy would get the plan that there is a whole lot to know before his question could be answered effectively. A tanker I was 2AE on had a negative GM and a slight port on the way out. *Every wave made it snap to Stbd, stall a couple of seconds and snap back. *It was all a guy could do to stay on his feet. *We did lose the fire in one boiler, but the FM lit it off the bricks. *My chief called the bridge and told them if they tried to make for sea this way, he would shut them down. *- They believed him, but he still had to listen to a bunch of griping because we lost two hours while they finished correcting the ballast. Matt Well, at the risk of being simple. I still suggest it's the wrong boat for the job. He just needs to start with the right boat. He can justify, defend, and make any excuses he wants.. Still water, whatever.. But once you leave the dock, things can change quickly to something you have never seen before. Anyway. Have a great fourth, go out in your boats for me ![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standby for heavy rolls | General | |||
Silverton 322 - Top heavy? | General | |||
she's too heavy in my boat ! | General | |||
Heavy Air | ASA |