On Jun 18, 3:36*pm, "Jim" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jun 18, 2:07 pm, JimH wrote:





On Jun 18, 2:00 pm, "Jim" wrote:

wrote in message

....
On Jun 18, 1:26 pm, JimH wrote:

A *balanced* view on the subject.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...113DF934A15756...

Here's some more balance:

We can't feed them meat:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6896309.stm

Can't let them sleep in a car seat:

http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148...&comments=true

Can't let them play football:

http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=71071

Can't take them to the emergency room for anything:

http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0...ued-when-child....

Can't let them play with toys:

http://www.uspirg.org/newsroom/toy-s...ws/consumer-gr....

Only thing we can do is lock them in a hermetically sealed room with
soft walls.

OK Who was the bean bag that got you started on this topic? Although, I
think I know. What was the name of the thread?

That's it Jim..........blame someone else for Loogie being unable to
control himself.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Me control myself? Who was the idiot that suggested that because some
parents decide to let their kids be kids, albeit in a safe and
controlled way, that somehow those parents are inferior and should be
subjected to child endangerment laws? Who is it that suggested that a
parent that allows their children to safely and responsibly
participate in sports is somehow a bad parent?

I guess I was right. Now what thread precipitated this one? I'm going to
have to google it up.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Remember, most of these elite trolls probably had their kids on boats
without jackets, or horses without kevlar too.. But they would never
admit it now... They are just here to troll me and loogie, and one of
us is not playing..