On Tue, 20 May 2008 07:58:15 -0400, HK wrote:

I got
"hooked" on deviant sociology in sophomore year at college

That explains quite a lot.

Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2008 07:58:15 -0400, HK wrote:

I got
"hooked" on deviant sociology in sophomore year at college

That explains quite a lot.



Indeed, that's why I like to watch the pig pilers perform here.

wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008 20:34:58 -0400, DK wrote:

wrote:
On May 18, 7:37 pm, DK wrote:
wrote:
On May 17, 11:11 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message
.....
On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
[Snippo]
That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all
know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the
****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel
and be quiet.
Casady
On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably
it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters
who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they
don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my
point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me
around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever
taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry
to have wasted your bandwidth....
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Â*Â*Â*--------------------
I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good
and interesting contributions to make.
I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep
lately.
I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where
everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have
started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has
been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not
someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all.
Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet
policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count
as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where
posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave
the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A
quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of
back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard
insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just
with Chuck and Harry running the show now that is scarey....
For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check
out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would
stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they
might just be stuck here with us too I swear it has something to do
with boatshoes
Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working
out, is it wet yet this year?
By for now..
D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who
read the rules, signed up and post.
You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but
because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed
to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your
account.
Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than
rationalization.
There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other
place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of
interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing*
posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar
playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical
comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam
and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days.
Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I
just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You need some new material...
Agreed. Harry was/is the king of "nonsensical comments about computer
operating systems". Now it's taboo?

Let's not forget his driveway, new septic tank (we know why THAT had to
be replaced), his office/kitchenette, office chair, etc...............

What a piece of work.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Everything except a 36' Zimmerman like lobster boat!
He's been quiet on that for a while. The only "reference" is the plural
use of the word boat.

That's a lisp.

True. He was never known for his typing skills or proper use of the
English language.

Jim wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Calling names again Dopey Dan?

ROTFLMAO This line is priceless.


That's as much talent as you will see from him. His own adult son walks
all over him so this is the only way he can vent and attempt (rather
pathetically) to redeem himself.

wrote:
On May 20, 7:58 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 20, 6:52 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008 22:34:04 -0300, "Don White" wrote:
"WaIIy" wrote in message
news On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:22:28 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:
You ended your vicious little troll with "I won't be back!" Get out
your red crayon and draw a circle around today's date on the calendar,
Scottie. Remember that as the first time we ever agreed on anything..
Should you try to sneak back in and attempt to stir up further
trouble, you will find that it takes a lot more than a new "handle"..
Geez Chuck, can we make a rant over in your world?
Oh that's right, we will be "moderated".
There are standards 'over there'. Half a dozen of the individualists here
wouldn't be interested in sailing the sterile Disneyesque waters in Chucks group.
Yes, that sounds about right
It's sort of funny to watch the little boys here **** and moan because
they don't have the self-control to behave decently at a place that
requires it.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
What's really funny is watching you play both ends of the candle.
Sucking chuckies little dickie cause he "is a real spammer/boater",
and coming back here cause you hate it there.... Didn't chuckie tell
you to talk about the picture posts??? You forgot the url too...
What's really funny is how uncouth you seem to be.

I've had my differences, mild ones, with Chuck over the years, but there
is no question about his love for boating or his boating experience. At
least half the "regular" posters here wouldn't know the pointy end of a
boat from the blunt end.

It takes no effort to follow Chuck's rules. Well, at least it takes no
effort for most of us. Apparently you couldn't control yourself for your
one post over there. Your problem, not mine.

As I explained some time ago, I visit here to observe the squalor. I got
"hooked" on deviant sociology in sophomore year at college, and these
days, rec.boats is about as close as I get to groups of deviants at play.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go there and stay there then. Harry, when will you realize, NOT ONE
SINGLE PERSON HERE WANTS YOU BACK. Notice how serene the place is
without you and JimH?

He is incapable of that.

wrote:
On May 19, 8:24 pm, DK wrote:
JimH wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
...
HK wrote:
wrote:
I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why
a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the
thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this
is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not
even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed
off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were
friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to
question the character of folks who have stood back and not said
anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like
another pet peeve of mine
When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are
rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them.
In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking
is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general,
really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the
simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you
should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock.
The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has
repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they
applied to you.
Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules.
It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been banned a
long time ago.
This thread is hysterical!
Pass the popcorn please.
I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the
group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is very
sad, Jim.
Nice try Dan. But as usual, you are wrong again.
Nice try, Warp17, but you have now been caught in a lie.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You know what's funny? Look at how totally yanked out Harry is with me
soley because I've caught him in many, many lies, call him out on his
childish name calling and petty insults!!!!

He has learned to spin, and selectively ignore, posts to his perceived
advantage. The reality is that we all know he is completely full of
**** and simply can't help himself.

Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2008 07:58:15 -0400, HK wrote:

I got
"hooked" on deviant sociology in sophomore year at college

That explains quite a lot.


"Hooked" isn't the correct term. "Diagnosed with.." is more appropriate.

On May 20, 8:04 pm, DK wrote:


That's as much talent as you will see from him. His own adult son walks
all over him so this is the only way he can vent and attempt (rather
pathetically) to redeem himself.

Yet another example of insulting a member..........yet worse his son.

You folks continue to show why this place is on a self destruct mode.

On May 20, 4:27�am, wrote:
On May 20, 6:52�am, HK wrote:





wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008 22:34:04 -0300, "Don White" wrote:

"WaIIy" wrote in message
news On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:22:28 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:

You ended your vicious little troll with "I won't be back!" Get out
your red crayon and draw a circle around today's date on the calendar,
Scottie. Remember that as the first time we ever agreed on anything..
Should you try to sneak back in and attempt to stir up further
trouble, you will find that it takes a lot more than a new "handle"..
Geez Chuck, can we make a rant over in your world?

Oh that's right, we will be "moderated".
There are standards 'over there'. �Half a dozen of the individualists here
wouldn't be interested in sailing the sterile Disneyesque waters in Chucks group.

Yes, that sounds about right

It's sort of funny to watch the little boys here **** and moan because
they don't have the self-control to behave decently at a place that
requires it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What's really funny is watching you play both ends of the candle.
Sucking chuckies little dickie cause he "is a real spammer/boater",
and coming back here cause you hate it there.... Didn't chuckie tell
you to talk about the picture posts??? � You forgot the url too...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Some people just exude class. Darn shame it isn't always high class,
isn't it? I don't think about you 2 minutes a month when you aren't in
my face, Scottie- but it's obvious you are consumed by some irrational
hatred of me. Your loss- you're the one surrounded by a cloud of your
own negative energy and unable to control your actions as a result.
I'd ask a reasonable gentleman to apologize for such an inappropriate
and offensive reference, but in your case I just won't bother.

On Tue, 20 May 2008 17:26:00 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:

On May 20, 4:27?am, wrote:
On May 20, 6:52?am, HK wrote:





wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008 22:34:04 -0300, "Don White" wrote:

"WaIIy" wrote in message
news On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:22:28 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:

You ended your vicious little troll with "I won't be back!" Get out
your red crayon and draw a circle around today's date on the calendar,
Scottie. Remember that as the first time we ever agreed on anything.
Should you try to sneak back in and attempt to stir up further
trouble, you will find that it takes a lot more than a new "handle".
Geez Chuck, can we make a rant over in your world?

Oh that's right, we will be "moderated".
There are standards 'over there'. ?Half a dozen of the individualists here
wouldn't be interested in sailing the sterile Disneyesque waters in Chucks group.

Yes, that sounds about right

It's sort of funny to watch the little boys here **** and moan because
they don't have the self-control to behave decently at a place that
requires it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What's really funny is watching you play both ends of the candle.
Sucking chuckies little dickie cause he "is a real spammer/boater",
and coming back here cause you hate it there.... Didn't chuckie tell
you to talk about the picture posts??? ? You forgot the url too...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Some people just exude class. Darn shame it isn't always high class,
isn't it? I don't think about you 2 minutes a month when you aren't in
my face, Scottie- but it's obvious you are consumed by some irrational
hatred of me. Your loss- you're the one surrounded by a cloud of your
own negative energy and unable to control your actions as a result.
I'd ask a reasonable gentleman to apologize for such an inappropriate
and offensive reference, but in your case I just won't bother.

What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. Who said that?

It's a shame you latch on to one person who called you something. Yet you
subtlely encourage the trio to do much worse.

You say you can do nothing, but we know better. Don't we?

I'd ask a gentleman to do what he could to put a stop to the ****. But I
won't do it again.
--
John *H*