John H. wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2008 17:26:00 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:

On May 20, 4:27?am, wrote:
On May 20, 6:52?am, HK wrote:





wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008 22:34:04 -0300, "Don White" wrote:
"WaIIy" wrote in message
news On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:22:28 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:
You ended your vicious little troll with "I won't be back!" Get out
your red crayon and draw a circle around today's date on the calendar,
Scottie. Remember that as the first time we ever agreed on anything.
Should you try to sneak back in and attempt to stir up further
trouble, you will find that it takes a lot more than a new "handle".
Geez Chuck, can we make a rant over in your world?
Oh that's right, we will be "moderated".
There are standards 'over there'. ?Half a dozen of the individualists here
wouldn't be interested in sailing the sterile Disneyesque waters in Chucks group.
Yes, that sounds about right
It's sort of funny to watch the little boys here **** and moan because
they don't have the self-control to behave decently at a place that
requires it.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
What's really funny is watching you play both ends of the candle.
Sucking chuckies little dickie cause he "is a real spammer/boater",
and coming back here cause you hate it there.... Didn't chuckie tell
you to talk about the picture posts??? ? You forgot the url too...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Some people just exude class. Darn shame it isn't always high class,
isn't it? I don't think about you 2 minutes a month when you aren't in
my face, Scottie- but it's obvious you are consumed by some irrational
hatred of me. Your loss- you're the one surrounded by a cloud of your
own negative energy and unable to control your actions as a result.
I'd ask a reasonable gentleman to apologize for such an inappropriate
and offensive reference, but in your case I just won't bother.

What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. Who said that?

It's a shame you latch on to one person who called you something. Yet you
subtlely encourage the trio to do much worse.

You say you can do nothing, but we know better. Don't we?

I'd ask a gentleman to do what he could to put a stop to the ****. But I
won't do it again.


The only way to put a "stop to the sh*t," as you so elegantly put it, is
for someone to flush you and your cronies down the toilet.

On Tue, 20 May 2008 20:11:02 -0400, DK wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2008 07:58:15 -0400, HK wrote:

I got
"hooked" on deviant sociology in sophomore year at college

That explains quite a lot.


"Hooked" isn't the correct term. "Diagnosed with.." is more appropriate.

And talking about them is as bad as talking to them!
--
John *H*

On May 20, 8:47 pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2008 17:26:00 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould



wrote:
On May 20, 4:27?am, wrote:
On May 20, 6:52?am, HK wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008 22:34:04 -0300, "Don White" wrote:

"WaIIy" wrote in message
news On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:22:28 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:

You ended your vicious little troll with "I won't be back!" Get out
your red crayon and draw a circle around today's date on the calendar,
Scottie. Remember that as the first time we ever agreed on anything.
Should you try to sneak back in and attempt to stir up further
trouble, you will find that it takes a lot more than a new "handle".
Geez Chuck, can we make a rant over in your world?

Oh that's right, we will be "moderated".
There are standards 'over there'. ?Half a dozen of the individualists here
wouldn't be interested in sailing the sterile Disneyesque waters in Chucks group.

Yes, that sounds about right

It's sort of funny to watch the little boys here **** and moan because
they don't have the self-control to behave decently at a place that
requires it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What's really funny is watching you play both ends of the candle.
Sucking chuckies little dickie cause he "is a real spammer/boater",
and coming back here cause you hate it there.... Didn't chuckie tell
you to talk about the picture posts??? ? You forgot the url too...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Some people just exude class. Darn shame it isn't always high class,
isn't it? I don't think about you 2 minutes a month when you aren't in
my face, Scottie- but it's obvious you are consumed by some irrational
hatred of me. Your loss- you're the one surrounded by a cloud of your
own negative energy and unable to control your actions as a result.
I'd ask a reasonable gentleman to apologize for such an inappropriate
and offensive reference, but in your case I just won't bother.

What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. Who said that?

It's a shame you latch on to one person who called you something. Yet you
subtlely encourage the trio to do much worse.

You say you can do nothing, but we know better. Don't we?

I'd ask a gentleman to do what he could to put a stop to the ****. But I
won't do it again.
--
John *H*

All you and other notorious members here do is whine and cry here
about Chuck and his board, yet you are one of the top 5 posters at his
place.

You and those same members also continue to make his board the top
topic of posts here.

Is there a common theme here?

Me thinks so.

On May 20, 8:26Â*pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On May 20, 4:27�am, wrote:





On May 20, 6:52�am, HK wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008 22:34:04 -0300, "Don White" wrote:

"WaIIy" wrote in message
news On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:22:28 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:

You ended your vicious little troll with "I won't be back!" Get out
your red crayon and draw a circle around today's date on the calendar,
Scottie. Remember that as the first time we ever agreed on anything.
Should you try to sneak back in and attempt to stir up further
trouble, you will find that it takes a lot more than a new "handle".
Geez Chuck, can we make a rant over in your world?

Oh that's right, we will be "moderated".
There are standards 'over there'. �Half a dozen of the individualists here
wouldn't be interested in sailing the sterile Disneyesque waters in Chucks group.

Yes, that sounds about right

It's sort of funny to watch the little boys here **** and moan because
they don't have the self-control to behave decently at a place that
requires it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What's really funny is watching you play both ends of the candle.
Sucking chuckies little dickie cause he "is a real spammer/boater",
and coming back here cause you hate it there.... Didn't chuckie tell
you to talk about the picture posts??? � You forgot the url too....- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Some people just exude class. Darn shame it isn't always high class,
isn't it? I don't think about you 2 minutes a month when you aren't in
my face, Scottie- but it's obvious you are consumed by some irrational
hatred of me. Your loss- you're the one surrounded by a cloud of your
own negative energy and unable to control your actions as a result.
I'd ask a reasonable gentleman to apologize for such an inappropriate
and offensive reference, but in your case I just won't bother.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It's not a hatred, it's just a deep and well founded disrespect for
you and people like you...

On May 20, 9:32 pm, wrote:
On May 20, 8:26 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:



On May 20, 4:27�am, wrote:

On May 20, 6:52�am, HK wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008 22:34:04 -0300, "Don White" wrote:

"WaIIy" wrote in message
news On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:22:28 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:

You ended your vicious little troll with "I won't be back!" Get out
your red crayon and draw a circle around today's date on the calendar,
Scottie. Remember that as the first time we ever agreed on anything.
Should you try to sneak back in and attempt to stir up further
trouble, you will find that it takes a lot more than a new "handle".
Geez Chuck, can we make a rant over in your world?

Oh that's right, we will be "moderated".
There are standards 'over there'. �Half a dozen of the individualists here
wouldn't be interested in sailing the sterile Disneyesque waters in Chucks group.

Yes, that sounds about right

It's sort of funny to watch the little boys here **** and moan because
they don't have the self-control to behave decently at a place that
requires it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What's really funny is watching you play both ends of the candle.
Sucking chuckies little dickie cause he "is a real spammer/boater",
and coming back here cause you hate it there.... Didn't chuckie tell
you to talk about the picture posts??? � You forgot the url too...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Some people just exude class. Darn shame it isn't always high class,
isn't it? I don't think about you 2 minutes a month when you aren't in
my face, Scottie- but it's obvious you are consumed by some irrational
hatred of me. Your loss- you're the one surrounded by a cloud of your
own negative energy and unable to control your actions as a result.
I'd ask a reasonable gentleman to apologize for such an inappropriate
and offensive reference, but in your case I just won't bother.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It's not a hatred, it's just a deep and well founded disrespect for
you and people like you...


A tough remark for anyone to make not really knowing what that person
is like or represents.

I really believe we are quite alike in terms of past experiences and
love for our kids.

I also believe that if we all met face to face that we would decide
that this sort of crap was nothing more than that.

I do not know the solution to the us vs. them thing but ( do know that
it is getting old.

On May 20, 6:32�pm, wrote:


It's not a hatred, it's just a deep and well founded disrespect for
you and people like you...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Odd. Among the names you continue to call me at every opportunity
is "hypocrite". Would that be a person who is insincere, or says
things they don't mean? Or would it be a person who has no flipping
idea from week to week how they *really* feel about anything?

From the archives:



Newsgroups: rec.boats
From:
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 07:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Mar 9 2008 7:11 am
Subject: In case nobody noticed........
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Mar 9, 10:03 am, Wayne.B wrote:


On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 23:40:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould

wrote:
Pretty soon, it would become apparent that if you
chose not to participate in the fighting and arguing there would be
very little else to do. That's where I'm at. When it got so bad that
it was actually embarrassing to be associated with this group it was
time to go. Getting sucked into the vortex once in a while was
additionally alarming.

(Wayne wrote):
As always, Chuck makes some good points. Too bad that very few are
listening.


(Scotty wrote):
I will miss Chuck, hope he sees fit to return as the summer rolls on,
or at least after the election.. Later Chuck if you are ever out
this
way, I would be happy to cook you a dinner and take you fishing;...

*************

Good thing I didn't take you up on your invitation to go fishing. I
would only be able to swim so far after your well founded disrespect
inspired you to throw me overboard. :-)

Do consider dropping the profane remarks. They are a long, long way
beneath you- or at least the rapidly eroding image of you I have tried
to sustain.

On May 20, 11:36Â*pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On May 20, 6:32�pm, wrote:



It's not a hatred, it's just a deep and well founded disrespect for
you and people like you...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Odd. Among the names you continue to call me at every opportunity
is "hypocrite". Â*Would that be a person who is insincere, or says
things they don't mean? Or would it be a person who has no flipping
idea from week to week how they *really* feel about anything?

From the archives:

Newsgroups: rec.boats
From:
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 07:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Mar 9 2008 7:11 am
Subject: In case nobody noticed........
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Mar 9, 10:03 am, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 23:40:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:
Pretty soon, it would become apparent that if you
chose not to participate in the fighting and arguing there would be
very little else to do. That's where I'm at. When it got so bad that
it was actually embarrassing to be associated with this group it was
time to go. Getting sucked into the vortex once in a while was
additionally alarming.

(Wayne wrote):

As always, Chuck makes some good points. Â*Too bad that very few are
listening.

(Scotty wrote):
I will miss Chuck, hope he sees fit to return as the summer rolls on,
or at least after the election.. Â*Later Chuck if you are ever out
this
way, I would be happy to cook you a dinner and take you fishing;...

*************

Good thing I didn't take you up on your invitation to go fishing. I
would only be able to swim so far after your well founded disrespect
inspired you to throw me overboard. :-)

Do consider dropping the profane remarks. They are a long, long way
beneath you- or at least the rapidly eroding image of you I have tried
to sustain.

At the time I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt.... get
over it Chuck..

wrote:
On May 20, 8:26 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On May 20, 4:27�am, wrote:





On May 20, 6:52�am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008 22:34:04 -0300, "Don White" wrote:
"WaIIy" wrote in message
news On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:22:28 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:
You ended your vicious little troll with "I won't be back!" Get out
your red crayon and draw a circle around today's date on the calendar,
Scottie. Remember that as the first time we ever agreed on anything.
Should you try to sneak back in and attempt to stir up further
trouble, you will find that it takes a lot more than a new "handle".
Geez Chuck, can we make a rant over in your world?
Oh that's right, we will be "moderated".
There are standards 'over there'. �Half a dozen of the individualists here
wouldn't be interested in sailing the sterile Disneyesque waters in Chucks group.
Yes, that sounds about right
It's sort of funny to watch the little boys here **** and moan because
they don't have the self-control to behave decently at a place that
requires it.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
What's really funny is watching you play both ends of the candle.
Sucking chuckies little dickie cause he "is a real spammer/boater",
and coming back here cause you hate it there.... Didn't chuckie tell
you to talk about the picture posts??? � You forgot the url too...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Some people just exude class. Darn shame it isn't always high class,
isn't it? I don't think about you 2 minutes a month when you aren't in
my face, Scottie- but it's obvious you are consumed by some irrational
hatred of me. Your loss- you're the one surrounded by a cloud of your
own negative energy and unable to control your actions as a result.
I'd ask a reasonable gentleman to apologize for such an inappropriate
and offensive reference, but in your case I just won't bother.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It's not a hatred, it's just a deep and well founded disrespect for
you and people like you...


What a strange comment.

On Tue, 20 May 2008 20:36:35 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:

On May 20, 6:32?pm, wrote:


It's not a hatred, it's just a deep and well founded disrespect for
you and people like you...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Odd. Among the names you continue to call me at every opportunity
is "hypocrite". Would that be a person who is insincere, or says
things they don't mean? Or would it be a person who has no flipping
idea from week to week how they *really* feel about anything?


Attitudes change, Chuck. From the first name-calling you allowed in your
place, my attitude has changed also.
--
John *H*

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2008 20:36:35 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:

On May 20, 6:32?pm, wrote:

It's not a hatred, it's just a deep and well founded disrespect for
you and people like you...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Odd. Among the names you continue to call me at every opportunity
is "hypocrite". Would that be a person who is insincere, or says
things they don't mean? Or would it be a person who has no flipping
idea from week to week how they *really* feel about anything?


Attitudes change, Chuck. From the first name-calling you allowed in your
place, my attitude has changed also.


Gee, I don't recall anyone calling you a name there. In fact, I don't
recall anyone else being called a name, either. What name were *you*
called, Herring?