Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 17, 10:28*pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message ... On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote: [Snippo] That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the ****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel and be quiet. Casady On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*-------------------- I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good and interesting contributions to make. I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep lately. I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all. Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just with Chuck and Harry running the show ![]() ![]() For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they might just be stuck here with us too ![]() with boatshoes ![]() Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working out, is it wet yet this year? By for now.. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 17, 11:11*pm, HK wrote:
wrote: On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote: wrote in message .... On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote: [Snippo] That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the ****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel and be quiet. Casady On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------**-------------------- I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good and interesting contributions to make. I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep lately. I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all. Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just with Chuck and Harry running the show ![]() ![]() For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they might just be stuck here with us too ![]() with boatshoes ![]() Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working out, is it wet yet this year? By for now.. D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who read the rules, signed up and post. You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your account. Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than rationalization. There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing* posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days. Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You need some new material... |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 18, 7:37*pm, DK wrote:
wrote: On May 17, 11:11 pm, HK wrote: wrote: On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote: wrote in message ..... On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote: [Snippo] That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the ****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel and be quiet. Casady On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------***-------------------- I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good and interesting contributions to make. I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep lately. I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all. Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just with Chuck and Harry running the show ![]() ![]() For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they might just be stuck here with us too ![]() with boatshoes ![]() Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working out, is it wet yet this year? By for now.. D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who read the rules, signed up and post. You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your account. Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than rationalization. There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing* posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days. Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You need some new material... Agreed. *Harry was/is the king of "nonsensical comments about computer operating systems". *Now it's taboo? Let's not forget his driveway, new septic tank (we know why THAT had to be replaced), his office/kitchenette, office chair, etc............... What a piece of work.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Everything except a 36' Zimmerman like lobster boat! |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 17, 11:11*pm, HK wrote:
wrote: On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote: wrote in message .... On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote: [Snippo] That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the ****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel and be quiet. Casady On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------**-------------------- I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good and interesting contributions to make. I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep lately. I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all. Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just with Chuck and Harry running the show ![]() ![]() For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they might just be stuck here with us too ![]() with boatshoes ![]() Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working out, is it wet yet this year? By for now.. D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who read the rules, signed up and post. You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your account. Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than rationalization. There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing* posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days. Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not to mention, you are over there in your troll thread, lying about circumstances and situations over here, you are dismissed Harry, plonk |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I plonked him months ago... what took you so long. ;-)
I go over *there* for giggles... that thread is a crack-up. --Mike wrote in message ... On May 17, 11:11 pm, HK wrote: wrote: On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote: [Snippo] That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the ****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel and be quiet. Casady On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------**-------------------- I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good and interesting contributions to make. I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep lately. I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all. Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just with Chuck and Harry running the show ![]() ![]() For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they might just be stuck here with us too ![]() with boatshoes ![]() Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working out, is it wet yet this year? By for now.. D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who read the rules, signed up and post. You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your account. Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than rationalization. There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing* posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days. Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not to mention, you are over there in your troll thread, lying about circumstances and situations over here, you are dismissed Harry, plonk |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
snip
because I can avoid even *seeing* posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical comments about computer operating systems snip You forgot to include incessant political trolling, didn't you? Just a tinge of hypocrisy, eh? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BANNED FROM VIRGIN ! | ASA | |||
Ted Bell banned! | ASA | |||
You've banned Vegemite!? | ASA | |||
You've banned Vegemite!? | ASA |