Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why
a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to question the character of folks who have stood back and not said anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like another pet peeve of mine ![]() |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 17, 12:46*pm, HK wrote:
wrote: I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to question the character of folks who have stood back and not said anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like another pet peeve of mine ![]() When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them. In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general, really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock. The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they applied to you. Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules. fortunately, wrecked boats has no rulers.... |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: and in general, really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock. So. You are banned from your own boat? |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 17, 1:04*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... wrote: *and in general, really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock. So. You are banned from your own boat? I will not continue this further, I just thought it was important for those of us left, or those who would not hear due to censorship to know.. That's all. It's really not that important in the scope of things, but for those of us who have been here, some nearly a decade, it is very interesting...... But that is all I have to say to anyone on line about it... Later.. Scotty |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 17, 9:06�am, wrote:
I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to question the character of folks who have stood back and not said anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like another pet peeve of mine ![]() ************* Something told me you would make an issue of this on rec.boats. Didn't take long for you to air your own dirty laundry, did it? Why do you think that anybody on this board gives a rip what happens in another group? Only because you choose to misrepresnt some important facts will I waste any time rebutting you assertions. ******** So here you are, crying to another discussion group that after becoming a member of a different forum and making one post that flagrantly violated the clearly stated conventions against personal attacks, etc, you were tossed out on your arse. You should be neither surprised nor outraged, you got exactly the result you were trolling for. Congrats. Now you can whine endlessly that the big bad moderator at some other group threw innocent little you into the gutter but continues to tolerate the presence of folks who have posted disruptive content to other boards, elsewhere on the net, in the past. You seem to believe that the mere presence on another forum of people with checkered posting histories elsewhere is hypocritical within the context of a "monitored" (actually, the correct term is "moderated") group. Here's the important functional difference; the other discussion group you refer to doesn't moderate past behavior, it moderates the present. The folks you seem to have such negative passion for have, in the largest sense, conducted themselves on the other board in a civil and polite manner. The moderator's job isn't to be some sort of "nanny" and head off every minor disagreement, but merely to keep the general discourse relatively civil and free of personal attacks. We strive to disagree without becoming personally disagreeable. Why are you so obsessed with trying to start trouble between rec.boats and another discussion group? Get over it. There is no reason to be "****ed". Your "friends" haven't "thrown you under the bus" by posting elsewhere, they are obviously free to post here (as am I) if they choose to do so. I can't imagine that anybody choosing one group over the other is doing so because Scottie posts to rec.boats. Your troll characterized the thread as filled with name calling directed at individuals within rec.boats. Nonsense. It is a very long thread. One post condemned an unidentified group apparently intent on destroying rec.boats with OT trolls as "snarks", and there are many, many posts thereafter from various members encouraging one another not to even mention rec.boats in the forum. The "snark" post was questionable, but the response and overall tone of the thread was constructive and nothing in the thread prior to your appearance was anything close to as negative and nasty as the tone you adopted or the personal attack content you posted. Except for your vicious little jab, the rest of the thread is standing for anybody and everybody to see. Both people here who might be able to stifle a yawn long enough and would otherwise care to check out the tread in question will find it in the "Scraping the Bottom of the Barrel" (OT) classification of the forum you trolled. Does it bother you at all to misrepresent the nature, content, and tone of the thread you were bitching about or the post that got you 86'd? (Apparently not). If you were looking for an example of the kind of behavior that certain boards won't tolerate- you found it. You ended your vicious little troll with "I won't be back!" Get out your red crayon and draw a circle around today's date on the calendar, Scottie. Remember that as the first time we ever agreed on anything. Should you try to sneak back in and attempt to stir up further trouble, you will find that it takes a lot more than a new "handle". I'm going back over to where the actual boaters hang out. As always, the welcome mat is out over there for anybody who wants to talk about *boats* (not other boaters), or who can participate in the OT section of the forum without making personal attacks on other posters. Good news for you, Scottie- anybody who left this group for the other forum and who repeats your oscar-winning trolling performance of earlier today will be back here to join you. (We moderate the present behavior within the forum, not past behavior somewhere else). |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 17, 1:22Â*pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On May 17, 9:06�am, wrote: I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to question the character of folks who have stood back and not said anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like another pet peeve of mine ![]() ************* Something told me you would make an issue of this on rec.boats. Â*Didn't take long for you to air your own dirty laundry, did it? Why do you think that anybody on this board gives a rip what happens in another group? Only because you choose to misrepresnt some important facts will I waste any time rebutting you assertions. ******** So here you are, crying to another discussion group that after becoming a member of a different forum and making one post that flagrantly violated the clearly stated conventions against personal attacks, etc, you were tossed out on your arse. You should be neither surprised nor outraged, you got exactly the result you were trolling for. Congrats. Now you can whine endlessly that the big bad moderator at some other group threw innocent little you into the gutter but continues to tolerate the presence of folks who have posted disruptive content to other boards, elsewhere on the net, in the past. You seem to believe that the mere presence on another forum of people with checkered posting histories elsewhere is hypocritical within the context of a "monitored" (actually, the correct term is "moderated") group. Here's the important functional difference; the other discussion group you refer to doesn't moderate past behavior, it moderates the present. The folks you seem to have such negative passion for have, in the largest sense, conducted themselves on the other board in a civil and polite manner. The moderator's job isn't to be some sort of "nanny" and head off every minor disagreement, but merely to keep the general discourse relatively civil and free of personal attacks. We strive to disagree without becoming personally disagreeable. Why are you so obsessed with trying to start trouble between rec.boats and another discussion group? Get over it. There is no reason to be "****ed". Your "friends" haven't "thrown you under the bus" by posting elsewhere, they are obviously free to post here (as am I) if they choose to do so. I can't imagine that anybody choosing one group over the other is doing so because Scottie posts to rec.boats. Your troll characterized the thread as filled with name calling directed at individuals within rec.boats. Nonsense. It is a very long thread. One post condemned an unidentified group apparently intent on destroying rec.boats with OT trolls as "snarks", and there are many, many posts thereafter from various members encouraging one another not to even mention rec.boats in the forum. The "snark" post was questionable, but the response and overall tone of the thread was constructive and nothing in the thread prior to your appearance was anything close to as negative and nasty as the tone you adopted or the personal attack content you posted. Except for your vicious little jab, the rest of the thread is standing for anybody and everybody to see. Both people here who might be able to stifle a yawn long enough and would otherwise care to check out the tread in question will find it in the "Scraping the Bottom of the Barrel" (OT) classification of the forum you trolled. Does it bother you at all to misrepresent the nature, content, and tone of the thread you were bitching about or the post that got you 86'd? (Apparently not). If you were looking for an example of the kind of behavior that certain boards won't tolerate- you found it. You ended your vicious little troll with "I won't be back!" Get out your red crayon and draw a circle around today's date on the calendar, Scottie. Remember that as the first time we ever agreed on anything. Should you try to sneak back in and attempt to stir up further trouble, you will find that it takes a lot more than a new "handle". I'm going back over to where the actual boaters hang out. As always, the welcome mat is out over there for anybody who wants to talk about *boats* (not other boaters), or who can participate in the OT section of the forum without making personal attacks on other posters. Good news for you, Scottie- anybody who left this group for the other forum and who repeats your oscar-winning trolling performance of earlier today will be back here to join you. (We moderate the present behavior within the forum, not past behavior somewhere else). Whatever chuck, you asked me to stop something here, you allowed on your own board, justify it any way you want. The post you found offensive here of mine did not even mention the name of any group, then you let a thread go on your site directly addressing and calling us names. It's all good Chuck, it's all good.. And as far as my lifetime ban, don't tempt me, I have been in the business for a loooooooong time. You are a hypocrite, nothing has changed... |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Response removed.. forget it Chuck. go back to the "actual boaters"...
can't really get the boat in yet this year so I guess I'll just stick around and see what comes up here... ,,|,, ![]() |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:22:28 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote: Why are you so obsessed with trying to start trouble between rec.boats and another discussion group? This is about the most hypocritical, one-way question I've seen in my life. Have you ever wondered, Chuck, why some of the 'nice' folks in your group persist in coming over here to start trouble? What a ridiculous question! -- John *H* |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BANNED FROM VIRGIN ! | ASA | |||
Ted Bell banned! | ASA | |||
You've banned Vegemite!? | ASA | |||
You've banned Vegemite!? | ASA |