now banned..
 

WaIIy wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 06:46:52 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On May 17, 12:46 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why
a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the
thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this
is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not
even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed
off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were
friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to
question the character of folks who have stood back and not said
anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like
another pet peeve of mine;)
When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are
rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them.

In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking is
not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general, really
obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple
rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect
to be escorted to the door or the dock.

The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has
repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they
applied to you.

Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules.
Harry, if you don't like rec.boats, why in hell are you here? Go away
and stay away. If you notice, the group is alot better without you and
JimH. Not one single person here misses you.

His psychiatrist wife could tell you.

They have a symbiotic, rather unsettling narcissistic relationship.


Wally and Loogy: dumb and dumber(er) :}

now banned..
 

JimH wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
...
HK wrote:
wrote:
I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why
a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the
thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this
is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not
even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed
off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were
friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to
question the character of folks who have stood back and not said
anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like
another pet peeve of mine;)
When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are
rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them.

In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking
is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general,
really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the
simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you
should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock.

The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has
repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they
applied to you.

Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules.
It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been banned a
long time ago.

This thread is hysterical!

Pass the popcorn please.
I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the
group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is very
sad, Jim.

Nice try Dan. But as usual, you are wrong again.



Nice try, Warp17, but you have now been caught in a lie.

now banned..
 

On May 19, 7:53 pm, John H. wrote:
This is it - no more of the JimH bull****.

JimH's first message to me - a 'welcome' message, I guess with nothing
provocative therein:
***********************************
Some more advice
" Message sent on May 3, 2008, 6:10pm "

Stop insulting and flaming former members who left your NG and maybe it
will stop.

Admit to it or not, rec.boats is a joke. Most all productive and
knowledgeable members have migrated to Chucks forum and no longer post to
your place. Just today told one of them (Gene) that he should stay away
from rec.boats. How nice of you.

Yesterday DK trolled for a fight here. The members here realized his
intentions and basically ignored him. He is one of your rec.boats faithful
members.

This is a "Private Message" to you meaning it is between you and me and not
meant to be shared. I am trying to get this issue settled mano-amano. I
trust you will respect that intention on my part.

Have a nice evening.
Jim
********************************************

JimH's message politely asking me to not PM him. (Note that he sent the
first PM!):

********************************************
(No Subject)
" Message sent on May 4, 2008, 6:59pm

Hey dummy.......stop sending me PM's.

If I had you type of character I would post your "Private" Message to me to
the forum.......my standards are higher.

Have a spectacular night dummy.
*****************************************

JimH has not changed.
--
John *H*

It was not a welcome message.

Got it.

You gave me permission to repost your PM's to me. Do you want me to
repost them (all made prior to the ones you just posted and directly
relating to my previous message)?

In your latest PM (yet another inflammatory one) you said you will no
longer respond to my posts or PM's. Knowing you and your integrity I
knew you would break that promise. ;-)

What exactly is your problem John?

now banned..
 

JimH wrote:
On May 18, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 19:48:08 -0400, "JimH" wrote:

"DK" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
...
HK wrote:
wrote:
I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why
a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the
thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this
is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not
even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed
off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were
friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to
question the character of folks who have stood back and not said
anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like
another pet peeve of mine;)
When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are
rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them.
In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking
is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general,
really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the
simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you
should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock.
The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has
repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they
applied to you.
Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules.
It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been banned a
long time ago.
This thread is hysterical!
Pass the popcorn please.
I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the
group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is very
sad, Jim.
Nice try Dan. But as usual, you are wrong again.
As a matter of fact, he's not. You whined to Chuck about getting personal
messages from me, and then you sent five more calling me names in each one.

If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in
Chuck's Place.

BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a
rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****.
--
John *H*

More name calling. This is the place known for it.

Since you and several others want to make this public, let's set the
record straight............

You sent me derogatory PM after PM. I asked you to stop. You did
not. Thus the message to Chuck asking you to stop.

My initial PM to you and your reply to me the other night, after you
flamed Chuck and his board here, was:

http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/6...board04oe2.jpg

3 more exchanges took place. You have my permission to post them.

Got it?


You are scary when you say "Got it?". Those are tough-guy words.

So you have 16 PMs in a new group with 38 members? Looks like a
conspiracy of circle jerks to me.

now banned..
 

JimH wrote:
On May 18, 8:47 pm, "Jim" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message

...

(Whining of the pathetic babies snipped)

If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in
Chuck's Place.
BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a
rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****.
--
John *H*
They are whining for attention, John. And you are giving them what they
want.
Please stop. No one here needs to be reminded of the trio's shortcomings.
Appreciate it. :-)

Another moderator. I think this place clearly has the other place
beat as I now count 5 moderators here vs. 1 *there*.

The name calling here also outnumbers the *other* place by a count of
50-0.

You win. ;-)

Great! Don't let the door hit you in the ass, Warp17!

now banned..
 

now banned..
 

Charlie wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


Finally, give it a rest. If you have a need to start a fight over
some silly thing or another, just drop me an email and I'll come back
in a different quise and give you a run for your money.

Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own
business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I
accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we
still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread
directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and
misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could
stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway,
and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his
own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy
is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held
nose.. good for you...


Have it your way Zorro.

The problem with shortpants, as nice a guy as he seems, is that he was
an enabler of krause's nasty behavior for a long, long time, until,
until, krause finally ****ed *him* off and then shortpants called him a
nasty name.

In other words, it ain't so until I say it's so, because I'm a nice guy.

It's no different now that he's at another place making excuses again.

-- Charlie

Let's not forget the days when HK and JimH were bitter enemies. I guess
when two schoolyard punks get their asses kicked enough, they learn to
form a little gang. Add the Canadian and the Three Stooges were born.

now banned..
 

On May 19, 7:53 pm, John H. wrote:
This is it - no more of the JimH bull****.

JimH's first message to me - a 'welcome' message, I guess with nothing
provocative therein:
***********************************
Some more advice
" Message sent on May 3, 2008, 6:10pm "

Stop insulting and flaming former members who left your NG and maybe it
will stop.

Admit to it or not, rec.boats is a joke. Most all productive and
knowledgeable members have migrated to Chucks forum and no longer post to
your place. Just today told one of them (Gene) that he should stay away
from rec.boats. How nice of you.

Yesterday DK trolled for a fight here. The members here realized his
intentions and basically ignored him. He is one of your rec.boats faithful
members.

This is a "Private Message" to you meaning it is between you and me and not
meant to be shared. I am trying to get this issue settled mano-amano. I
trust you will respect that intention on my part.

Have a nice evening.
Jim
********************************************

JimH's message politely asking me to not PM him. (Note that he sent the
first PM!):

********************************************
(No Subject)
" Message sent on May 4, 2008, 6:59pm

Hey dummy.......stop sending me PM's.

If I had you type of character I would post your "Private" Message to me to
the forum.......my standards are higher.

Have a spectacular night dummy.
*****************************************

JimH has not changed.
--
John *H*

Thanks for making my point.

BTW: You forgot to post your PM to me yesterday:

===========================

"Do you get a lot of satisfaction out of becoming the sniveling liar
your hero has been for ages? Keep working on it.

BTW, any further from you will be ignored. Here and there.

Got it, Dipnuts?"

===========================


Drop it already John.

59th request.

now banned..
 

JimH wrote:


After asking him to stop PM'ing me after receiving a couple of
unprovoked flaming and derogatory PM's from him, and with him
continuing to do so (I believe he sent 3 more), I had to ask for an
intervention.

The truth comes out and it is so reminiscent of grade school. He
obliviously can't ignore and delete a PM so he has to bitch about it.

I wonder if the folks at oh.rr get the same whining messages from this
"adult"?

now banned..
 

JimH wrote:


BTW: He sent me yet another one yesterday.

Have you tried your Mommy? Maybe she cares.

now banned..
 

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:22:28 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:

You ended your vicious little troll with "I won't be back!" Get out
your red crayon and draw a circle around today's date on the calendar,
Scottie. Remember that as the first time we ever agreed on anything.
Should you try to sneak back in and attempt to stir up further
trouble, you will find that it takes a lot more than a new "handle".

Geez Chuck, can we make a rant over in your world?

Oh that's right, we will be "moderated".

There are standards 'over there'. Half a dozen of the worse derelics here
wouldn't be suitable for sailing the cleaner waters in Chucks group.

now banned..
 

"DK" wrote in message
...
Charlie wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


Finally, give it a rest. If you have a need to start a fight over
some silly thing or another, just drop me an email and I'll come back
in a different quise and give you a run for your money.

Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own
business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I
accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we
still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread
directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and
misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could
stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway,
and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his
own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy
is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held
nose.. good for you...


Have it your way Zorro.

The problem with shortpants, as nice a guy as he seems, is that he was an
enabler of krause's nasty behavior for a long, long time, until, until,
krause finally ****ed *him* off and then shortpants called him a nasty
name.

In other words, it ain't so until I say it's so, because I'm a nice guy.

It's no different now that he's at another place making excuses again.

-- Charlie

Let's not forget the days when HK and JimH were bitter enemies. I guess
when two schoolyard punks get their asses kicked enough, they learn to
form a little gang. Add the Canadian and the Three Stooges were born.

Calling names again Dopey Dan?
I'm waiting for the day when you show your true colours 'over there' and
will be wildly cheering when your rotted hulk will be banned from civilized
waters.

now banned..
 

JimH wrote:
On May 19, 7:27 pm, JimH wrote:
On May 19, 7:12 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here



wrote:
JimH wrote:
On May 18, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 19:48:08 -0400, "JimH" wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
...
HK wrote:
wrote:
I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why
a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the
thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this
is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not
even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed
off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were
friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to
question the character of folks who have stood back and not said
anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like
another pet peeve of mine;)
When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are
rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them.
In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking
is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general,
really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the
simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you
should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock.
The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has
repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they
applied to you.
Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules.
It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been banned a
long time ago.
This thread is hysterical!
Pass the popcorn please.
I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the
group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is very
sad, Jim.
Nice try Dan. But as usual, you are wrong again.
As a matter of fact, he's not. You whined to Chuck about getting personal
messages from me, and then you sent five more calling me names in each one.
If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in
Chuck's Place.
BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a
rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****.
--
John *H*
More name calling. This is the place known for it.
Since you and several others want to make this public, let's set the
record straight............
You sent me derogatory PM after PM. I asked you to stop. You did
not. Thus the message to Chuck asking you to stop.
My initial PM to you and your reply to me the other night, after you
flamed Chuck and his board here, was:
http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/6...board04oe2.jpg
3 more exchanges took place. You have my permission to post them.
Got it?
LOL, that is so funny, JimH whining to Chuck to ask JohnH to stop
sending him PM messages. "Daddy, would you tell Johnnie to stop
looking at me." I would have thought you were old enough to ignore any
message you didn't want to read.
If you need any help on how to ignore a message, ask Chuck and he will
be able to tell you how to hit the delete button.
Got it?
After asking him to stop PM'ing me after receiving a couple of
unprovoked flaming and derogatory PM's from him, and with him
continuing to do so (I believe he sent 3 more), I had to ask for an
intervention.

Who is the little kid Reggie?

Got it?

BTW: He sent me yet another one yesterday.

Are you grown up enough to ignore them?

now banned..
 

JimH wrote:
On May 19, 7:12 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
JimH wrote:
On May 18, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 19:48:08 -0400, "JimH" wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
...
HK wrote:
wrote:
I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why
a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the
thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this
is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not
even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed
off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were
friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to
question the character of folks who have stood back and not said
anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like
another pet peeve of mine;)
When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are
rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them.
In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking
is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general,
really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the
simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you
should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock.
The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has
repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they
applied to you.
Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules.
It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been banned a
long time ago.
This thread is hysterical!
Pass the popcorn please.
I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the
group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is very
sad, Jim.
Nice try Dan. But as usual, you are wrong again.
As a matter of fact, he's not. You whined to Chuck about getting personal
messages from me, and then you sent five more calling me names in each one.
If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in
Chuck's Place.
BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a
rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****.
--
John *H*
More name calling. This is the place known for it.
Since you and several others want to make this public, let's set the
record straight............
You sent me derogatory PM after PM. I asked you to stop. You did
not. Thus the message to Chuck asking you to stop.
My initial PM to you and your reply to me the other night, after you
flamed Chuck and his board here, was:
http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/6...board04oe2.jpg
3 more exchanges took place. You have my permission to post them.
Got it?
LOL, that is so funny, JimH whining to Chuck to ask JohnH to stop
sending him PM messages. "Daddy, would you tell Johnnie to stop
looking at me." I would have thought you were old enough to ignore any
message you didn't want to read.

If you need any help on how to ignore a message, ask Chuck and he will
be able to tell you how to hit the delete button.

Got it?

After asking him to stop PM'ing me after receiving a couple of
unprovoked flaming and derogatory PM's from him, and with him
continuing to do so (I believe he sent 3 more), I had to ask for an
intervention.

Who is the little kid Reggie?

Got it?

I think anyone who has to go running to Dad to tell him to stop looking
at me, is a kid. That is exactly what you did. Handle it yourself, in
the most productive way possible. Ignore them, don't go whining for
Chuck to intervene. Dont' read them, delete them, and it is the end of
the story.

Got it?

now banned..
 

"HK" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
On May 19, 7:27 pm, JimH wrote:
On May 19, 7:12 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here



wrote:
JimH wrote:
On May 18, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 19:48:08 -0400, "JimH" wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
...
HK wrote:
wrote:
I have now been banned from the other group after one post,
asking why
a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while
the
thread origionator was also over here calling us names.
Remember, this
is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups"
(not
even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty
****ed
off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought
were
friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I
have to
question the character of folks who have stood back and not
said
anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of
like
another pet peeve of mine;)
When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and
there are
rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them.
In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive
drinking
is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in
general,
really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by
the
simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or
you
should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock.
The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and
he has
repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe
they
applied to you.
Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules.
It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been
banned a
long time ago.
This thread is hysterical!
Pass the popcorn please.
I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you
as the
group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is
very
sad, Jim.
Nice try Dan. But as usual, you are wrong again.
As a matter of fact, he's not. You whined to Chuck about getting
personal
messages from me, and then you sent five more calling me names in
each one.
If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in
Chuck's Place.
BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just
a
rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****.
--
John *H*
More name calling. This is the place known for it.
Since you and several others want to make this public, let's set the
record straight............
You sent me derogatory PM after PM. I asked you to stop. You did
not. Thus the message to Chuck asking you to stop.
My initial PM to you and your reply to me the other night, after you
flamed Chuck and his board here, was:
http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/6...board04oe2.jpg
3 more exchanges took place. You have my permission to post them.
Got it?
LOL, that is so funny, JimH whining to Chuck to ask JohnH to stop
sending him PM messages. "Daddy, would you tell Johnnie to stop
looking at me." I would have thought you were old enough to ignore
any
message you didn't want to read.
If you need any help on how to ignore a message, ask Chuck and he will
be able to tell you how to hit the delete button.
Got it?
After asking him to stop PM'ing me after receiving a couple of
unprovoked flaming and derogatory PM's from him, and with him
continuing to do so (I believe he sent 3 more), I had to ask for an
intervention.

Who is the little kid Reggie?

Got it?

BTW: He sent me yet another one yesterday.


Herring is sending his little nastrygrams to several people, via email and
private messages. I've gotten a total of four so far, at two different
sites. Easy enough to filter right into the SPAM box on email...

I really don't know what his game is...does he think those he insults here
are going to pay more attention to him if he messages them?



Maybe you and JimH should evaluate your postings.

now banned..
 

"JimH" wrote in message
...
On May 19, 7:53 pm, John H. wrote:
This is it - no more of the JimH bull****.

JimH's first message to me - a 'welcome' message, I guess with nothing
provocative therein:
***********************************
Some more advice
" Message sent on May 3, 2008, 6:10pm "

Stop insulting and flaming former members who left your NG and maybe it
will stop.

Admit to it or not, rec.boats is a joke. Most all productive and
knowledgeable members have migrated to Chucks forum and no longer post to
your place. Just today told one of them (Gene) that he should stay away
from rec.boats. How nice of you.

Yesterday DK trolled for a fight here. The members here realized his
intentions and basically ignored him. He is one of your rec.boats
faithful
members.

This is a "Private Message" to you meaning it is between you and me and
not
meant to be shared. I am trying to get this issue settled mano-amano. I
trust you will respect that intention on my part.

Have a nice evening.
Jim
********************************************

JimH's message politely asking me to not PM him. (Note that he sent the
first PM!):

********************************************
(No Subject)
" Message sent on May 4, 2008, 6:59pm

Hey dummy.......stop sending me PM's.

If I had you type of character I would post your "Private" Message to me
to
the forum.......my standards are higher.

Have a spectacular night dummy.
*****************************************

JimH has not changed.
--
John *H*

It was not a welcome message.

Got it.

You gave me permission to repost your PM's to me. Do you want me to
repost them (all made prior to the ones you just posted and directly
relating to my previous message)?

In your latest PM (yet another inflammatory one) you said you will no
longer respond to my posts or PM's. Knowing you and your integrity I
knew you would break that promise. ;-)

What exactly is your problem John?

If you do not want your emails posted by a guy who does, just do not write
nasty emails. Stupid ones also.

now banned..
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:22:28 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:

You ended your vicious little troll with "I won't be back!" Get out
your red crayon and draw a circle around today's date on the calendar,
Scottie. Remember that as the first time we ever agreed on anything.
Should you try to sneak back in and attempt to stir up further
trouble, you will find that it takes a lot more than a new "handle".

Geez Chuck, can we make a rant over in your world?

Oh that's right, we will be "moderated".

There are standards 'over there'. Half a dozen of the worse derelics here
wouldn't be suitable for sailing the cleaner waters in Chucks group.



He lets the worse ones in there. You included.

now banned..
 

now banned..
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Calling names again Dopey Dan?

ROTFLMAO This line is priceless.

now banned..
 

On May 20, 6:52*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008 22:34:04 -0300, "Don White" wrote:

"WaIIy" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:22:28 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:

You ended your vicious little troll with "I won't be back!" Get out
your red crayon and draw a circle around today's date on the calendar,
Scottie. Remember that as the first time we ever agreed on anything.
Should you try to sneak back in and attempt to stir up further
trouble, you will find that it takes a lot more than a new "handle".
Geez Chuck, can we make a rant over in your world?

Oh that's right, we will be "moderated".
There are standards 'over there'. *Half a dozen of the individualists here
wouldn't be interested in sailing the sterile Disneyesque waters in Chucks group.

Yes, that sounds about right

It's sort of funny to watch the little boys here **** and moan because
they don't have the self-control to behave decently at a place that
requires it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What's really funny is watching you play both ends of the candle.
Sucking chuckies little dickie cause he "is a real spammer/boater",
and coming back here cause you hate it there.... Didn't chuckie tell
you to talk about the picture posts??? You forgot the url too...

now banned..
 

wrote in message
...
On May 20, 6:52 am, HK wrote:
(Baby Harry's nonsense snipped)

What's really funny is watching you play both ends of the candle.
Sucking chuckies little dickie cause he "is a real spammer/boater",
and coming back here cause you hate it there.... Didn't chuckie tell
you to talk about the picture posts??? You forgot the url too...

I know it is difficult to talk about Harry without using bad language; but
would you at least try. ;-)

now banned..
 

On May 20, 7:42*am, "Jim" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On May 20, 6:52 am, HK wrote:
(Baby Harry's nonsense snipped)

What's really funny is watching you play both ends of the candle.
Sucking chuckies little dickie cause he "is a real spammer/boater",
and coming back here cause you hate it there.... Didn't chuckie tell
you to talk about the picture posts??? * You forgot the url too...

I know it is difficult to talk about Harry without using bad language; but
would you at least try. ;-)

I will try to ignore him...

now banned..
 

now banned..
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Calling names again Dopey Dan?

ROTFLMAO This line is priceless.


Mine was an adjective.....

now banned..
 

On May 20, 7:58*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 20, 6:52 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008 22:34:04 -0300, "Don White" wrote:
"WaIIy" wrote in message
m...
On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:22:28 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:
You ended your vicious little troll with "I won't be back!" Get out
your red crayon and draw a circle around today's date on the calendar,
Scottie. Remember that as the first time we ever agreed on anything..
Should you try to sneak back in and attempt to stir up further
trouble, you will find that it takes a lot more than a new "handle"..
Geez Chuck, can we make a rant over in your world?
Oh that's right, we will be "moderated".
There are standards 'over there'. *Half a dozen of the individualists here
wouldn't be interested in sailing the sterile Disneyesque waters in Chucks group.
Yes, that sounds about right
It's sort of funny to watch the little boys here **** and moan because
they don't have the self-control to behave decently at a place that
requires it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What's really funny is watching you play both ends of the candle.
Sucking chuckies little dickie cause he "is a real spammer/boater",
and coming back here cause you hate it there.... Didn't chuckie tell
you to talk about the picture posts??? * You forgot the url too...

What's really funny is how uncouth you seem to be.

I've had my differences, mild ones, with Chuck over the years, but there
is no question about his love for boating or his boating experience. At
least half the "regular" posters here wouldn't know the pointy end of a
boat from the blunt end.

It takes no effort to follow Chuck's rules. Well, at least it takes no
effort for most of us. Apparently you couldn't control yourself for your
one post over there. Your problem, not mine.

As I explained some time ago, I visit here to observe the squalor. I got
"hooked" on deviant sociology in sophomore year at college, and these
days, rec.boats is about as close as I get to groups of deviants at play.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go there and stay there then. Harry, when will you realize, NOT ONE
SINGLE PERSON HERE WANTS YOU BACK. Notice how serene the place is
without you and JimH?

now banned..
 

now banned..
 

On May 19, 8:37*pm, DK wrote:
Charlie wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Finally, give it a rest. *If you have a need to start a fight over
some silly thing or another, just drop me an email and I'll come back
in a different quise and give you a run for your money.

Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own
business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I
accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we
still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread
directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and
misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could
stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway,
and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his
own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy
is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held
nose.. good for you...

Have it your way Zorro.

The problem with shortpants, as nice a guy as he seems, is that he was
an enabler of krause's nasty behavior for a long, long time, until,
until, krause finally ****ed *him* off and then shortpants called him a
nasty name.

In other words, it ain't so until I say it's so, because I'm a nice guy.

It's no different now that he's at another place making excuses again.

-- Charlie

Let's not forget the days when HK and JimH were bitter enemies. *I guess
when two schoolyard punks get their asses kicked enough, they learn to
form a little gang. *Add the Canadian and the Three Stooges were born.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Bingo!

now banned..
 

On May 19, 8:24*pm, DK wrote:
JimH wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
m...
JimH wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
news:4MCdnTE9raXh4LLVnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@giganews. com...
HK wrote:
wrote:
I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why
a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the
thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this
is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not
even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed
off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were
friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to
question the character of folks who have stood back and not said
anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like
another pet peeve of mine;)
When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are
rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them.

In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking
is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general,
really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the
simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you
should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock.

The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has
repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they
applied to you.

Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules.
It is unfortunate to a certain degree. *You would have been banned a
long time ago.

This thread is hysterical!

Pass the popcorn please.
I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the
group "whiner". *Complaining to someone about what you read here is very
sad, Jim.

Nice try Dan. *But as usual, you are wrong again.

Nice try, Warp17, but you have now been caught in a lie.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You know what's funny? Look at how totally yanked out Harry is with me
soley because I've caught him in many, many lies, call him out on his
childish name calling and petty insults!!!!

now banned..
 

On May 19, 8:10*pm, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
This is it - no more of the JimH bull****.

JimH's first message to me - a 'welcome' message, I guess with nothing
provocative therein:
***********************************
Some more advice
" Message sent on May 3, 2008, 6:10pm "

Stop insulting and flaming former members who left your NG and maybe it
will stop.

Admit to it or not, rec.boats is a joke. Most all productive and
knowledgeable members have migrated to Chucks forum and no longer post to
your place. Just today told one of them (Gene) that he should stay away
from rec.boats. How nice of you.

Yesterday DK trolled for a fight here. The members here realized his
intentions and basically ignored him. He is one of your rec.boats faithful
members.

This is a "Private Message" to you meaning it is between you and me and not
meant to be shared. I am trying to get this issue settled mano-amano. I
trust you will respect that intention on my part.

Have a nice evening.
Jim
********************************************

JimH's message politely asking me to not PM him. (Note that he sent the
first PM!):

********************************************
(No Subject)
" Message sent on May 4, 2008, 6:59pm

Hey dummy.......stop sending me PM's.

If I had you type of character I would post your "Private" Message to me to
the forum.......my standards are higher.

Have a spectacular night dummy.
*****************************************

JimH has not changed.

The real question for you, dirtbag, is why are you private messaging
people who want nothing to do with you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The real question for you, dirtbag, is why are you emailing people who
want nothing to do with you?

now banned..
 

On May 19, 8:00*pm, HK wrote:
JimH wrote:
On May 19, 7:27 pm, JimH wrote:
On May 19, 7:12 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here

wrote:
JimH wrote:
On May 18, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 19:48:08 -0400, "JimH" wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
news:ibednbN1kOHaJq3VnZ2dnUVZ_uqdnZ2d@gigane ws.com...
JimH wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
news:4MCdnTE9raXh4LLVnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@giga news.com...
HK wrote:
wrote:
I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why
a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the
thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this
is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not
even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed
off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were
friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to
question the character of folks who have stood back and not said
anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like
another pet peeve of mine;)
When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are
rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them.
In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking
is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general,
really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the
simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you
should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock.
The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has
repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they
applied to you.
Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules.
It is unfortunate to a certain degree. *You would have been banned a
long time ago.
This thread is hysterical!
Pass the popcorn please.
I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the
group "whiner". *Complaining to someone about what you read here is very
sad, Jim.
Nice try Dan. *But as usual, you are wrong again.
As a matter of fact, he's not. You whined to Chuck about getting personal
messages from me, and then you sent five more calling me names in each one.
If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in
Chuck's Place.
BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a
rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****.
--
John *H*
More name calling. *This is the place known for it.
Since you and several others want to make this public, let's set the
record straight............
You sent me derogatory PM after PM. *I asked you to stop. * You did
not. *Thus the message to Chuck asking you to stop.
My initial PM to you and your reply to me the other night, after you
flamed Chuck and his board here, was:
http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/6...board04oe2.jpg
3 more exchanges took place. *You have my permission to post them.
Got it?
LOL, that is so funny, JimH whining to Chuck to ask JohnH to stop
sending him PM messages. * "Daddy, would you tell Johnnie to stop
looking at me." * I would have thought you were old enough to ignore any
message you didn't want to read.
If you need any help on how to ignore a message, ask Chuck and he will
be able to tell you how to hit the delete button.
Got it?
After asking him to stop PM'ing me after receiving a couple of
unprovoked flaming and derogatory PM's from him, and with him
continuing to do so (I believe he sent 3 more), I had to ask for an
intervention.

Who is the little kid Reggie?

Got it?

BTW: *He sent me yet another one yesterday.

Herring is sending his little nastrygrams to several people, via email
and private messages. I've gotten a total of four so far, at two
different sites. Easy enough to filter right into the SPAM box on email...

I really don't know what his game is...does he think those he insults
here are going to pay more attention to him if he messages them?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hmmm, it's bad for JohnH to send "nastrygrams" to people, but it's
quite okay for you to do it?

now banned..
 

On Tue, 20 May 2008 07:58:15 -0400, HK wrote:

I got
"hooked" on deviant sociology in sophomore year at college

That explains quite a lot.

now banned..
 

Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2008 07:58:15 -0400, HK wrote:

I got
"hooked" on deviant sociology in sophomore year at college

That explains quite a lot.



Indeed, that's why I like to watch the pig pilers perform here.

now banned..
 

now banned..
 

Jim wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Calling names again Dopey Dan?

ROTFLMAO This line is priceless.


That's as much talent as you will see from him. His own adult son walks
all over him so this is the only way he can vent and attempt (rather
pathetically) to redeem himself.

now banned..
 

now banned..
 

now banned..
 

Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2008 07:58:15 -0400, HK wrote:

I got
"hooked" on deviant sociology in sophomore year at college

That explains quite a lot.


"Hooked" isn't the correct term. "Diagnosed with.." is more appropriate.

now banned..
 

On May 20, 8:04 pm, DK wrote:


That's as much talent as you will see from him. His own adult son walks
all over him so this is the only way he can vent and attempt (rather
pathetically) to redeem himself.

Yet another example of insulting a member..........yet worse his son.

You folks continue to show why this place is on a self destruct mode.

now banned..
 

On May 20, 4:27�am, wrote:
On May 20, 6:52�am, HK wrote:





wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008 22:34:04 -0300, "Don White" wrote:

"WaIIy" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:22:28 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:

You ended your vicious little troll with "I won't be back!" Get out
your red crayon and draw a circle around today's date on the calendar,
Scottie. Remember that as the first time we ever agreed on anything..
Should you try to sneak back in and attempt to stir up further
trouble, you will find that it takes a lot more than a new "handle"..
Geez Chuck, can we make a rant over in your world?

Oh that's right, we will be "moderated".
There are standards 'over there'. �Half a dozen of the individualists here
wouldn't be interested in sailing the sterile Disneyesque waters in Chucks group.

Yes, that sounds about right

It's sort of funny to watch the little boys here **** and moan because
they don't have the self-control to behave decently at a place that
requires it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What's really funny is watching you play both ends of the candle.
Sucking chuckies little dickie cause he "is a real spammer/boater",
and coming back here cause you hate it there.... Didn't chuckie tell
you to talk about the picture posts??? � You forgot the url too...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Some people just exude class. Darn shame it isn't always high class,
isn't it? I don't think about you 2 minutes a month when you aren't in
my face, Scottie- but it's obvious you are consumed by some irrational
hatred of me. Your loss- you're the one surrounded by a cloud of your
own negative energy and unable to control your actions as a result.
I'd ask a reasonable gentleman to apologize for such an inappropriate
and offensive reference, but in your case I just won't bother.

now banned..
 

On Tue, 20 May 2008 17:26:00 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:

On May 20, 4:27?am, wrote:
On May 20, 6:52?am, HK wrote:





wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008 22:34:04 -0300, "Don White" wrote:

"WaIIy" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:22:28 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
wrote:

You ended your vicious little troll with "I won't be back!" Get out
your red crayon and draw a circle around today's date on the calendar,
Scottie. Remember that as the first time we ever agreed on anything.
Should you try to sneak back in and attempt to stir up further
trouble, you will find that it takes a lot more than a new "handle".
Geez Chuck, can we make a rant over in your world?

Oh that's right, we will be "moderated".
There are standards 'over there'. ?Half a dozen of the individualists here
wouldn't be interested in sailing the sterile Disneyesque waters in Chucks group.

Yes, that sounds about right

It's sort of funny to watch the little boys here **** and moan because
they don't have the self-control to behave decently at a place that
requires it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What's really funny is watching you play both ends of the candle.
Sucking chuckies little dickie cause he "is a real spammer/boater",
and coming back here cause you hate it there.... Didn't chuckie tell
you to talk about the picture posts??? ? You forgot the url too...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Some people just exude class. Darn shame it isn't always high class,
isn't it? I don't think about you 2 minutes a month when you aren't in
my face, Scottie- but it's obvious you are consumed by some irrational
hatred of me. Your loss- you're the one surrounded by a cloud of your
own negative energy and unable to control your actions as a result.
I'd ask a reasonable gentleman to apologize for such an inappropriate
and offensive reference, but in your case I just won't bother.

What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. Who said that?

It's a shame you latch on to one person who called you something. Yet you
subtlely encourage the trio to do much worse.

You say you can do nothing, but we know better. Don't we?

I'd ask a gentleman to do what he could to put a stop to the ****. But I
won't do it again.
--
John *H*