|
now banned..
On May 17, 9:09*pm, "JimH" wrote:
"DK" wrote in message ... John H. wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 20:51:08 -0400, DK wrote: HK wrote: wrote: I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to question the character of folks who have stood back and not said anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like another pet peeve of mine;) When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them. In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general, really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock. The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they applied to you. Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules. It is unfortunate to a certain degree. *You would have been banned a long time ago. If it's any consolation, JimH is sending me personal messages (in Chuck's Place) telling me what a bad boy I am. Post them here. *The three amigos/douche bags an not immune to responsibility for their lame actions. JohnH has a habit of posting personal messages (note the word personal) sent to him on this NG. In this case I have no problem with him doing so................post away Herring.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Jim,this place is a pile of ****, remember? What are you doing here? Go back to Chuck's where he'll allow you to call people names if he likes you...... |
now banned..
On May 17, 11:11*pm, HK wrote:
wrote: On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote: wrote in message .... On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote: [Snippo] That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the ****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel and be quiet. Casady On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------**-------------------- I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good and interesting contributions to make. I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep lately. I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all. Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just with Chuck and Harry running the show;) * * *now that is scarey...;) For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they might just be stuck here with us too;) I swear it has something to do with boatshoes;) Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working out, is it wet yet this year? By for now.. D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who read the rules, signed up and post. You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your account. Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than rationalization. There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing* posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days. Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go away.... NOT ONE PERSON HERE WANTS YOU TO COME BACK, get it? |
now banned..
On May 18, 9:42*am, HK wrote:
wrote: Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway, and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held nose.. good for you... yada yada yada yada You got banned because you broke the rules and virtually asked to be banned. There's nothing more to it, no matter how many times you try to rationalize it. Go back to licking boat shoes.. I think someone stepped in seagull poo, "over there"... |
now banned..
On May 18, 9:14*am, HK wrote:
John H. wrote: On Sun, 18 May 2008 08:28:01 -0400, "Jim" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Sat, 17 May 2008 19:25:10 -0700 (PDT), BTW, I received five messages from JimH, all telling me I was a sick individual because I said something negative about the way Chuck handled people like Harry and the problems between the two groups. John *H* Even Outlook Express can deal with unwanted emails. How did he get your addy. anyway? I noticed that you flub it in your headers. ( The following is not specifically aimed at John) It will not do any good to grouse about anything that goes on at Chuck's group. If it upsets you, don't read it. The two groups can coexist peacefully if they leave us alone and we do the same for them. There's only a few babies over there that act as if we've ripped their bottles out of their mouths. Filter them and their whining won't bother you. A personal message can be sent in Chuck's Place without an email address.. One just clicks on a name and their profile page pops up with a link to sending a personal message. You've sent me a couple there, and they end up in the same place the emails you've sent me recently...in the garbage disposal.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You've emailed me with nothing but flames, Harry. |
now banned..
|
now banned..
|
now banned..
On May 18, 9:55*am, wrote:
On May 17, 11:11*pm, HK wrote: wrote: On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote: wrote in message .... On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote: [Snippo] That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the ****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel and be quiet. Casady On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------***-------------------- I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good and interesting contributions to make. I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep lately. I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all. Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just with Chuck and Harry running the show;) * * *now that is scarey....;) For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they might just be stuck here with us too;) I swear it has something to do with boatshoes;) Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working out, is it wet yet this year? By for now.. D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who read the rules, signed up and post. You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your account. Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than rationalization. There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing* posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days. Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go away.... NOT ONE PERSON HERE WANTS YOU TO COME BACK, get it?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey Loogie, check this out.. since we are far from boating, I am going to hijack this thread.. If it doesn't go my way, I will continue to post until it does;) Let it die now, check out my very lame startup website for our new line of pitwear;) http://www.rowdymouse.com Like I said before. Sorry to my friends here who know my history with boats, and those who don't. But I have left the boat in the garage so far this year. Any parent who has a 14 yo kid that is willing to spend a weekend with dad will understand my sharp turn to other outdoor activity.. However, she does really enjoy evenings on the lake with her friends so it should be out soon. When it is, I promise more boating photos and posts...Scotty, smallboats.com for anyone who does not already know... yes, I am actually a boater, sometimes... |
now banned..
On May 18, 10:31*am, wrote:
On May 18, 9:55*am, wrote: On May 17, 11:11*pm, HK wrote: wrote: On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote: [Snippo] That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the ****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel and be quiet. Casady On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------****-------------------- I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good and interesting contributions to make. I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep lately. I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all. Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just with Chuck and Harry running the show;) * * *now that is scarey...;) For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they might just be stuck here with us too;) I swear it has something to do with boatshoes;) Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working out, is it wet yet this year? By for now.. D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who read the rules, signed up and post. You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your account. Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than rationalization. There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing* posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days. Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go away.... NOT ONE PERSON HERE WANTS YOU TO COME BACK, get it?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey Loogie, check this out.. since we are far from boating, I am going to hijack this thread.. If it doesn't go my way, I will continue to post until it does;) Let it die now, check out my very lame startup website for our new line of pitwear;) http://www.rowdymouse.com Like I said before. Sorry to my friends here who know my history with boats, and those who don't. But I have left the boat in the garage so far this year. Any parent who has a 14 yo kid that is willing to spend a weekend with dad will understand my sharp turn to other outdoor activity.. However, she does really enjoy evenings on the lake with her friends so it should be out soon. When it is, I promise more boating photos and posts...Scotty, smallboats.com *for anyone who does not already know... yes, I am actually a boater, sometimes...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good stuff! My son and I went to a local pond yesterday and got some worms wet. I like the rowdy mouse, he's cool. I want a t-shirt!! |
now banned..
|
now banned..
On Sun, 18 May 2008 12:40:05 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: And I've seen this in action on Boatingforum. Somebody in the course of discussion will mention that the moon is white and immediately the usual suspects will "correct" that because the moon isn't white, it's off-white and dash off an email to Chuck proclaiming offense, high crimes and misdemeanors. The moon is actually a dark gray that reflects only 7% of the light that strikes it. Casady |
now banned..
On May 18, 3:49*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Sun, 18 May 2008 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Finally, give it a rest. *If you have a need to start a fight over some silly thing or another, just drop me an email and I'll come back in a different quise and give you a run for your money. Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway, and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held nose.. good for you... Have it your way Zorro.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not knowing the story of Zorro, I don't follow the reference.. oh well... |
now banned..
JimH wrote:
"DK" wrote in message ... HK wrote: wrote: I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to question the character of folks who have stood back and not said anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like another pet peeve of mine;) When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them. In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general, really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock. The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they applied to you. Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules. It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been banned a long time ago. This thread is hysterical! Pass the popcorn please. I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is very sad, Jim. |
now banned..
|
now banned..
D.Duck wrote:
snip because I can avoid even *seeing* posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical comments about computer operating systems snip You forgot to include incessant political trolling, didn't you? Just a tinge of hypocrisy, eh? He's blind to that. He can't help it. |
now banned..
JimH wrote:
"DK" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "DK" wrote in message ... HK wrote: wrote: I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to question the character of folks who have stood back and not said anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like another pet peeve of mine;) When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them. In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general, really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock. The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they applied to you. Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules. It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been banned a long time ago. This thread is hysterical! Pass the popcorn please. I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is very sad, Jim. Nice try Dan. But as usual, you are wrong again. My motto: ignore Dan wherever you can! :) He's just one of the rec.boats returdos, along with Reggie, Florida Jim, DumbAss Loogy and, of course, *Mr. Innocent* - Herring. |
now banned..
On Sun, 18 May 2008 19:48:08 -0400, "JimH" wrote:
"DK" wrote in message m... JimH wrote: "DK" wrote in message ... HK wrote: wrote: I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to question the character of folks who have stood back and not said anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like another pet peeve of mine;) When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them. In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general, really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock. The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they applied to you. Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules. It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been banned a long time ago. This thread is hysterical! Pass the popcorn please. I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is very sad, Jim. Nice try Dan. But as usual, you are wrong again. As a matter of fact, he's not. You whined to Chuck about getting personal messages from me, and then you sent five more calling me names in each one. If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in Chuck's Place. BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****. -- John *H* |
now banned..
John H. wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 19:48:08 -0400, "JimH" wrote: "DK" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "DK" wrote in message ... HK wrote: wrote: I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to question the character of folks who have stood back and not said anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like another pet peeve of mine;) When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them. In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general, really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock. The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they applied to you. Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules. It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been banned a long time ago. This thread is hysterical! Pass the popcorn please. I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is very sad, Jim. Nice try Dan. But as usual, you are wrong again. As a matter of fact, he's not. You whined to Chuck about getting personal messages from me, and then you sent five more calling me names in each one. If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in Chuck's Place. BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****. You, Dimwit Dan, JackoffJim from Florida, and Scott sure like to discuss that other place in some detail here. BTW, Jim H may not have been the only poster to complain to the moderator about your foul-mouthed little private messages. |
now banned..
On May 18, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 19:48:08 -0400, "JimH" wrote: "DK" wrote in message m... JimH wrote: "DK" wrote in message news:4MCdnTE9raXh4LLVnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@giganews. com... HK wrote: wrote: I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to question the character of folks who have stood back and not said anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like another pet peeve of mine;) When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them. In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general, really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock. The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they applied to you. Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules. It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been banned a long time ago. This thread is hysterical! Pass the popcorn please. I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is very sad, Jim. Nice try Dan. But as usual, you are wrong again. As a matter of fact, he's not. You whined to Chuck about getting personal messages from me, and then you sent five more calling me names in each one. If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in Chuck's Place. BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****. -- John *H* More name calling. This is the place known for it. Since you and several others want to make this public, let's set the record straight............ You sent me derogatory PM after PM. I asked you to stop. You did not. Thus the message to Chuck asking you to stop. My initial PM to you and your reply to me the other night, after you flamed Chuck and his board here, was: http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/6...board04oe2.jpg 3 more exchanges took place. You have my permission to post them. Got it? |
now banned..
"John H." wrote in message ... (Whining of the pathetic babies snipped) If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in Chuck's Place. BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****. -- John *H* They are whining for attention, John. And you are giving them what they want. Please stop. No one here needs to be reminded of the trio's shortcomings. Appreciate it. :-) |
now banned..
On May 18, 8:47 pm, "Jim" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... (Whining of the pathetic babies snipped) If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in Chuck's Place. BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****. -- John *H* They are whining for attention, John. And you are giving them what they want. Please stop. No one here needs to be reminded of the trio's shortcomings. Appreciate it. :-) Another moderator. I think this place clearly has the other place beat as I now count 5 moderators here vs. 1 *there*. The name calling here also outnumbers the *other* place by a count of 50-0. You win. ;-) |
now banned..
On May 18, 11:14*am, wrote:
On May 18, 10:31*am, wrote: On May 18, 9:55*am, wrote: On May 17, 11:11*pm, HK wrote: wrote: On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote: [Snippo] That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the ****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel and be quiet. Casady On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*****-------------------- I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good and interesting contributions to make. I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep lately. I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all. Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just with Chuck and Harry running the show;) * * *now that is scarey...;) For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they might just be stuck here with us too;) I swear it has something to do with boatshoes;) Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working out, is it wet yet this year? By for now.. D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who read the rules, signed up and post. You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your account. Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than rationalization. There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing* posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days. Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go away.... NOT ONE PERSON HERE WANTS YOU TO COME BACK, get it?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey Loogie, check this out.. since we are far from boating, I am going to hijack this thread.. If it doesn't go my way, I will continue to post until it does;) Let it die now, check out my very lame startup website for our new line of pitwear;) http://www.rowdymouse.com Like I said before. Sorry to my friends here who know my history with boats, and those who don't. But I have left the boat in the garage so far this year. Any parent who has a 14 yo kid that is willing to spend a weekend with dad will understand my sharp turn to other outdoor activity.. However, she does really enjoy evenings on the lake with her friends so it should be out soon. When it is, I promise more boating photos and posts...Scotty, smallboats.com *for anyone who does not already know... yes, I am actually a boater, sometimes...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good stuff! My son and I went to a local pond yesterday and got some worms wet. I like the rowdy mouse, he's cool. I want a t-shirt!!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, a lot of folks like the RM.. We have a whole bunch of related characters and stuff to go along with it. Put out the first CNC embroidered version today, looks great. Picked up the kid at her friends house and took them to the MX track, really is a crossover sport, lots of girls riding along with the guys. I got to fool around with my chase vehicle (old school hard tail mini bike) down by the CT River which is about 500 yards from the track too. It got real greasy after a good rain, but the place cleared out and my kid got to take the pro course. You can't see most of the track if you are not on it, she says she fell about 5 times or more out there.. Apparently she stood up the bike, restarted it and didn't let it bother her much. She did break a clutch lever but the way it broke, she was able to ride another hour or so anyway. She really loves riding. The rain left 3 of about 40 on the track, and she was one of the three that slid around during the whole storm, wet clay, she wanted to slid around, so I let her stay out Anyway, I will let you know when I get the shirts going, We kicked up the CNC today, going to try the silk screen and airbrush this week, now that I am feeling better. And yes, I still promise to get my boat out and tell you all about that too...;) Malguard Trollbreaker ;) |
now banned..
On May 18, 9:17*pm, JimH wrote:
On May 18, 8:47 pm, "Jim" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . (Whining of the pathetic babies snipped) If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in Chuck's Place. BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****. -- John *H* They are whining for attention, John. And you are giving them what they want. Please stop. No one here needs to be reminded of the trio's shortcomings.. Appreciate it. :-) Another moderator. * I think this place clearly has the other place beat as I now count 5 moderators here vs. 1 *there*. The name calling here also outnumbers the *other* place by a count of 50-0. You win. *;-)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - yup, yer right, now drop it already... |
now banned..
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sun, 18 May 2008 08:28:01 -0400, "Jim" wrote: There's only a few babies over there that act as if we've ripped their bottles out of their mouths Couldn't have said it better myself. He's Baaaaccccck! welcome. You missed the announcement of the birth of my first Grandbaby. Gabrielle. |
now banned..
On Sun, 18 May 2008 23:35:34 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 18 May 2008 08:28:01 -0400, "Jim" wrote: There's only a few babies over there that act as if we've ripped their bottles out of their mouths Couldn't have said it better myself. He's Baaaaccccck! welcome. You missed the announcement of the birth of my first Grandbaby. Gabrielle. -- John *H* |
now banned..
On Sun, 18 May 2008 20:47:10 -0400, "Jim" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message .. . (Whining of the pathetic babies snipped) If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in Chuck's Place. BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****. -- John *H* They are whining for attention, John. And you are giving them what they want. Please stop. No one here needs to be reminded of the trio's shortcomings. Appreciate it. :-) Done. -- John *H* |
now banned..
On Sun, 18 May 2008 23:35:34 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 18 May 2008 08:28:01 -0400, "Jim" wrote: There's only a few babies over there that act as if we've ripped their bottles out of their mouths Couldn't have said it better myself. He's Baaaaccccck! welcome. You missed the announcement of the birth of my first Grandbaby. Gabrielle. I think I missed the name also. Congratulations, again! -- John *H* |
now banned..
"John H." wrote in message ... On Sun, 18 May 2008 20:47:10 -0400, "Jim" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. (Whining of the pathetic babies snipped) If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in Chuck's Place. BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****. -- John *H* They are whining for attention, John. And you are giving them what they want. Please stop. No one here needs to be reminded of the trio's shortcomings. Appreciate it. :-) Done. -- John *H* I am eternally grateful. :-) |
now banned..
On Mon, 19 May 2008 07:41:24 -0400, "Jim" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message .. . On Sun, 18 May 2008 20:47:10 -0400, "Jim" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... (Whining of the pathetic babies snipped) If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in Chuck's Place. BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****. -- John *H* They are whining for attention, John. And you are giving them what they want. Please stop. No one here needs to be reminded of the trio's shortcomings. Appreciate it. :-) Done. -- John *H* I am eternally grateful. :-) Eternal is the length of time an empty Dasani water bottle spends in a land fill. I learned that on the television. -- John *H* |
now banned..
On May 18, 9:17*pm, JimH wrote:
On May 18, 8:47 pm, "Jim" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . (Whining of the pathetic babies snipped) If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in Chuck's Place. BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****. -- John *H* They are whining for attention, John. And you are giving them what they want. Please stop. No one here needs to be reminded of the trio's shortcomings.. Appreciate it. :-) Another moderator. * I think this place clearly has the other place beat as I now count 5 moderators here vs. 1 *there*. The name calling here also outnumbers the *other* place by a count of 50-0. You win. *;-)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go back to the *other* place then. Not one single person here wants you or Harry back. |
now banned..
On May 18, 8:15*pm, HK wrote:
JimH wrote: "DK" wrote in message m... JimH wrote: "DK" wrote in message news:4MCdnTE9raXh4LLVnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@giganews. com... HK wrote: wrote: I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to question the character of folks who have stood back and not said anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like another pet peeve of mine;) When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them. In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general, really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock. The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they applied to you. Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules. It is unfortunate to a certain degree. *You would have been banned a long time ago. This thread is hysterical! Pass the popcorn please. I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the group "whiner". *Complaining to someone about what you read here is very sad, Jim. Nice try Dan. *But as usual, you are wrong again. My motto: *ignore Dan wherever you can! *:) He's just one of the rec.boats returdos, along with Reggie, Florida Jim, * DumbAss Loogy and, of course, *Mr. Innocent* - Herring.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go to Chuck's group with your childish name calling and petty school girl insults. |
now banned..
On May 18, 7:37*pm, DK wrote:
wrote: On May 17, 11:11 pm, HK wrote: wrote: On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote: wrote in message ..... On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote: [Snippo] That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the ****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel and be quiet. Casady On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------***-------------------- I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good and interesting contributions to make. I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep lately. I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all. Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just with Chuck and Harry running the show;) * * *now that is scarey....;) For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they might just be stuck here with us too;) I swear it has something to do with boatshoes;) Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working out, is it wet yet this year? By for now.. D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who read the rules, signed up and post. You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your account. Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than rationalization. There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing* posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days. Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You need some new material... Agreed. *Harry was/is the king of "nonsensical comments about computer operating systems". *Now it's taboo? Let's not forget his driveway, new septic tank (we know why THAT had to be replaced), his office/kitchenette, office chair, etc............... What a piece of work.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Everything except a 36' Zimmerman like lobster boat! |
now banned..
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Finally, give it a rest. If you have a need to start a fight over some silly thing or another, just drop me an email and I'll come back in a different quise and give you a run for your money. Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway, and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held nose.. good for you... Have it your way Zorro. The problem with shortpants, as nice a guy as he seems, is that he was an enabler of krause's nasty behavior for a long, long time, until, until, krause finally ****ed *him* off and then shortpants called him a nasty name. In other words, it ain't so until I say it's so, because I'm a nice guy. It's no different now that he's at another place making excuses again. -- Charlie |
now banned..
|
now banned..
JimH wrote:
On May 18, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote: On Sun, 18 May 2008 19:48:08 -0400, "JimH" wrote: "DK" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "DK" wrote in message ... HK wrote: wrote: I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to question the character of folks who have stood back and not said anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like another pet peeve of mine;) When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them. In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general, really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock. The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they applied to you. Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules. It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been banned a long time ago. This thread is hysterical! Pass the popcorn please. I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is very sad, Jim. Nice try Dan. But as usual, you are wrong again. As a matter of fact, he's not. You whined to Chuck about getting personal messages from me, and then you sent five more calling me names in each one. If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in Chuck's Place. BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****. -- John *H* More name calling. This is the place known for it. Since you and several others want to make this public, let's set the record straight............ You sent me derogatory PM after PM. I asked you to stop. You did not. Thus the message to Chuck asking you to stop. My initial PM to you and your reply to me the other night, after you flamed Chuck and his board here, was: http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/6...board04oe2.jpg 3 more exchanges took place. You have my permission to post them. Got it? LOL, that is so funny, JimH whining to Chuck to ask JohnH to stop sending him PM messages. "Daddy, would you tell Johnnie to stop looking at me." I would have thought you were old enough to ignore any message you didn't want to read. If you need any help on how to ignore a message, ask Chuck and he will be able to tell you how to hit the delete button. Got it? |
now banned..
On May 19, 7:12 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote: JimH wrote: On May 18, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote: On Sun, 18 May 2008 19:48:08 -0400, "JimH" wrote: "DK" wrote in message news:ibednbN1kOHaJq3VnZ2dnUVZ_uqdnZ2d@giganews. com... JimH wrote: "DK" wrote in message news:4MCdnTE9raXh4LLVnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@giganew s.com... HK wrote: wrote: I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to question the character of folks who have stood back and not said anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like another pet peeve of mine;) When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them. In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general, really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock. The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they applied to you. Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules. It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been banned a long time ago. This thread is hysterical! Pass the popcorn please. I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is very sad, Jim. Nice try Dan. But as usual, you are wrong again. As a matter of fact, he's not. You whined to Chuck about getting personal messages from me, and then you sent five more calling me names in each one. If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in Chuck's Place. BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****. -- John *H* More name calling. This is the place known for it. Since you and several others want to make this public, let's set the record straight............ You sent me derogatory PM after PM. I asked you to stop. You did not. Thus the message to Chuck asking you to stop. My initial PM to you and your reply to me the other night, after you flamed Chuck and his board here, was: http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/6...board04oe2.jpg 3 more exchanges took place. You have my permission to post them. Got it? LOL, that is so funny, JimH whining to Chuck to ask JohnH to stop sending him PM messages. "Daddy, would you tell Johnnie to stop looking at me." I would have thought you were old enough to ignore any message you didn't want to read. If you need any help on how to ignore a message, ask Chuck and he will be able to tell you how to hit the delete button. Got it? After asking him to stop PM'ing me after receiving a couple of unprovoked flaming and derogatory PM's from him, and with him continuing to do so (I believe he sent 3 more), I had to ask for an intervention. Who is the little kid Reggie? Got it? |
now banned..
On May 19, 7:27 pm, JimH wrote:
On May 19, 7:12 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: JimH wrote: On May 18, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote: On Sun, 18 May 2008 19:48:08 -0400, "JimH" wrote: "DK" wrote in message news:ibednbN1kOHaJq3VnZ2dnUVZ_uqdnZ2d@giganews. com... JimH wrote: "DK" wrote in message news:4MCdnTE9raXh4LLVnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@giganew s.com... HK wrote: wrote: I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to question the character of folks who have stood back and not said anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like another pet peeve of mine;) When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them. In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general, really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock. The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they applied to you. Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules. It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been banned a long time ago. This thread is hysterical! Pass the popcorn please. I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is very sad, Jim. Nice try Dan. But as usual, you are wrong again. As a matter of fact, he's not. You whined to Chuck about getting personal messages from me, and then you sent five more calling me names in each one. If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in Chuck's Place. BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****. -- John *H* More name calling. This is the place known for it. Since you and several others want to make this public, let's set the record straight............ You sent me derogatory PM after PM. I asked you to stop. You did not. Thus the message to Chuck asking you to stop. My initial PM to you and your reply to me the other night, after you flamed Chuck and his board here, was: http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/6...board04oe2.jpg 3 more exchanges took place. You have my permission to post them. Got it? LOL, that is so funny, JimH whining to Chuck to ask JohnH to stop sending him PM messages. "Daddy, would you tell Johnnie to stop looking at me." I would have thought you were old enough to ignore any message you didn't want to read. If you need any help on how to ignore a message, ask Chuck and he will be able to tell you how to hit the delete button. Got it? After asking him to stop PM'ing me after receiving a couple of unprovoked flaming and derogatory PM's from him, and with him continuing to do so (I believe he sent 3 more), I had to ask for an intervention. Who is the little kid Reggie? Got it? BTW: He sent me yet another one yesterday. |
now banned..
This is it - no more of the JimH bull****.
JimH's first message to me - a 'welcome' message, I guess with nothing provocative therein: *********************************** Some more advice " Message sent on May 3, 2008, 6:10pm " Stop insulting and flaming former members who left your NG and maybe it will stop. Admit to it or not, rec.boats is a joke. Most all productive and knowledgeable members have migrated to Chucks forum and no longer post to your place. Just today told one of them (Gene) that he should stay away from rec.boats. How nice of you. Yesterday DK trolled for a fight here. The members here realized his intentions and basically ignored him. He is one of your rec.boats faithful members. This is a "Private Message" to you meaning it is between you and me and not meant to be shared. I am trying to get this issue settled mano-amano. I trust you will respect that intention on my part. Have a nice evening. Jim ******************************************** JimH's message politely asking me to not PM him. (Note that he sent the first PM!): ******************************************** (No Subject) " Message sent on May 4, 2008, 6:59pm Hey dummy.......stop sending me PM's. If I had you type of character I would post your "Private" Message to me to the forum.......my standards are higher. Have a spectacular night dummy. ***************************************** JimH has not changed. -- John *H* |
now banned..
JimH wrote:
On May 19, 7:27 pm, JimH wrote: On May 19, 7:12 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: JimH wrote: On May 18, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote: On Sun, 18 May 2008 19:48:08 -0400, "JimH" wrote: "DK" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "DK" wrote in message ... HK wrote: wrote: I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to question the character of folks who have stood back and not said anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like another pet peeve of mine;) When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them. In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general, really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock. The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they applied to you. Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules. It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been banned a long time ago. This thread is hysterical! Pass the popcorn please. I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is very sad, Jim. Nice try Dan. But as usual, you are wrong again. As a matter of fact, he's not. You whined to Chuck about getting personal messages from me, and then you sent five more calling me names in each one. If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in Chuck's Place. BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****. -- John *H* More name calling. This is the place known for it. Since you and several others want to make this public, let's set the record straight............ You sent me derogatory PM after PM. I asked you to stop. You did not. Thus the message to Chuck asking you to stop. My initial PM to you and your reply to me the other night, after you flamed Chuck and his board here, was: http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/6...board04oe2.jpg 3 more exchanges took place. You have my permission to post them. Got it? LOL, that is so funny, JimH whining to Chuck to ask JohnH to stop sending him PM messages. "Daddy, would you tell Johnnie to stop looking at me." I would have thought you were old enough to ignore any message you didn't want to read. If you need any help on how to ignore a message, ask Chuck and he will be able to tell you how to hit the delete button. Got it? After asking him to stop PM'ing me after receiving a couple of unprovoked flaming and derogatory PM's from him, and with him continuing to do so (I believe he sent 3 more), I had to ask for an intervention. Who is the little kid Reggie? Got it? BTW: He sent me yet another one yesterday. Herring is sending his little nastrygrams to several people, via email and private messages. I've gotten a total of four so far, at two different sites. Easy enough to filter right into the SPAM box on email... I really don't know what his game is...does he think those he insults here are going to pay more attention to him if he messages them? |
now banned..
John H. wrote:
This is it - no more of the JimH bull****. JimH's first message to me - a 'welcome' message, I guess with nothing provocative therein: *********************************** Some more advice " Message sent on May 3, 2008, 6:10pm " Stop insulting and flaming former members who left your NG and maybe it will stop. Admit to it or not, rec.boats is a joke. Most all productive and knowledgeable members have migrated to Chucks forum and no longer post to your place. Just today told one of them (Gene) that he should stay away from rec.boats. How nice of you. Yesterday DK trolled for a fight here. The members here realized his intentions and basically ignored him. He is one of your rec.boats faithful members. This is a "Private Message" to you meaning it is between you and me and not meant to be shared. I am trying to get this issue settled mano-amano. I trust you will respect that intention on my part. Have a nice evening. Jim ******************************************** JimH's message politely asking me to not PM him. (Note that he sent the first PM!): ******************************************** (No Subject) " Message sent on May 4, 2008, 6:59pm Hey dummy.......stop sending me PM's. If I had you type of character I would post your "Private" Message to me to the forum.......my standards are higher. Have a spectacular night dummy. ***************************************** JimH has not changed. The real question for you, dirtbag, is why are you private messaging people who want nothing to do with you? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com