As a student of politics...
 

"HK" wrote in message
...
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:


I was discussing "policy," crap-for-brains. Because of the similarities
in policy between Bush and McCain, McCain is being referred to as
McBush.

Why don't you crawl back up your ass, where you belong, and go off and
haunt some newsgroup where full-time snarkiness is appreciated?

Your reply is not conducive to reasonable discourse. I thought you
believed in reasonable discourse, and preferred a NG without flames,
where discussion could be civil. Even if you disagreed with my post, it
definitely was reasonable discourse and was not a flame.


Go pee up a rope, Reggie. Your years of crappy behavior here disqualify
you from participating in "reasonable discourse."

Is that the best a Yale graduate can do? Did you and GWB attend the same
communications classes?

As a student of politics...
 

wrote in message
...
On Apr 24, 12:07 am, wrote:
On Apr 23, 11:32 pm, "Lu Powell" wrote:





"HK" wrote in message

...

...I was mightily impressed by Hillary Clinton's 10-point victory
yesterday in the Pennsylvania Democratic primary. The woman is tough
and resilient, tough enough to beat the crap out of the Republicans
this fall.

I like Barack Obama, but I don't think he is tough enough to take on
the Republican smear machine that will be out in full force and, in
fact, already is, based upon some dirty ads I've seen.

The Indiana primary is one I am going to watch closely.

"Most people on the right have no problem understanding people on the
left because many, if not most, were on the left themselves when they
were younger. But many, if not most, people on the left find it
inexplicable how any decent and intelligent person could be on the
right."

- Thomas Sowell, April 8, 2008

It's because the far left is mostly ignorant and intolerant too.. Kind
of like the KKK, or the Nation of Islam, they care little about anyone
who can not serve their own selfish needs...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That's a great job of pigeon holing.

Harry has inappropriate relations with pigeons? Figures.

Troll
 

wrote in message
...
On Apr 23, 7:56 pm, "JimH" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message

...

On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:00:57 -0400, "Jim" wrote:

Hee hee..... you just proved your posts are dumbed down..
Proper procedure on VHF is simply *OUT* .... the yahoo CB crowd use
"over
and out".

Whatever

Give'em a big 10-4 good buddy just for giggles.

:-)

Whatever happened to your motto of "Lead by Example"?

What ever happened to your wanting a kinder and gentler rec.boats? Why
don't you go back over to Chuck's and call everyone in rec.boats some
more names?

Jim H is always asking others to lead. I guess he appreciates the view
associated with not being the lead dog.

As a student of politics...
 

Jim wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:


I was discussing "policy," crap-for-brains. Because of the
similarities in policy between Bush and McCain, McCain is being
referred to as McBush.

Why don't you crawl back up your ass, where you belong, and go off
and haunt some newsgroup where full-time snarkiness is appreciated?

Your reply is not conducive to reasonable discourse. I thought you
believed in reasonable discourse, and preferred a NG without flames,
where discussion could be civil. Even if you disagreed with my post,
it definitely was reasonable discourse and was not a flame.


Go pee up a rope, Reggie. Your years of crappy behavior here
disqualify you from participating in "reasonable discourse."

Is that the best a Yale graduate can do? Did you and GWB attend the same
communications classes?


"reggie," aka crap-for-brains, gets the treatment from me he deserves,
as do you, cyst-breath. If you don't like it, you are welcome to come up
here and try to punch me in the nose.

As a student of politics...
 

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Jim wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:


I was discussing "policy," crap-for-brains. Because of the
similarities in policy between Bush and McCain, McCain is being
referred to as McBush.

Why don't you crawl back up your ass, where you belong, and go off and
haunt some newsgroup where full-time snarkiness is appreciated?

Your reply is not conducive to reasonable discourse. I thought you
believed in reasonable discourse, and preferred a NG without flames,
where discussion could be civil. Even if you disagreed with my post,
it definitely was reasonable discourse and was not a flame.


Go pee up a rope, Reggie. Your years of crappy behavior here disqualify
you from participating in "reasonable discourse."

Is that the best a Yale graduate can do? Did you and GWB attend the same
communications classes?


"reggie," aka crap-for-brains, gets the treatment from me he deserves, as
do you, cyst-breath. If you don't like it, you are welcome to come up here
and try to punch me in the nose.

Another juvenile remark from a supposed Yale attendee. Grow up Harry. Set an
example that you would like the rest of us to emulate.

As a student of politics...
 

Jim wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Jim wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:


I was discussing "policy," crap-for-brains. Because of the
similarities in policy between Bush and McCain, McCain is being
referred to as McBush.

Why don't you crawl back up your ass, where you belong, and go off
and haunt some newsgroup where full-time snarkiness is appreciated?

Your reply is not conducive to reasonable discourse. I thought you
believed in reasonable discourse, and preferred a NG without
flames, where discussion could be civil. Even if you disagreed
with my post, it definitely was reasonable discourse and was not a
flame.


Go pee up a rope, Reggie. Your years of crappy behavior here
disqualify you from participating in "reasonable discourse."

Is that the best a Yale graduate can do? Did you and GWB attend the
same communications classes?


"reggie," aka crap-for-brains, gets the treatment from me he deserves,
as do you, cyst-breath. If you don't like it, you are welcome to come
up here and try to punch me in the nose.

Another juvenile remark from a supposed Yale attendee. Grow up Harry.
Set an example that you would like the rest of us to emulate.


GPUAR, pus-breath.

As a student of politics...
 

Jim wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:


I was discussing "policy," crap-for-brains. Because of the
similarities in policy between Bush and McCain, McCain is being
referred to as McBush.

Why don't you crawl back up your ass, where you belong, and go off
and haunt some newsgroup where full-time snarkiness is appreciated?

Your reply is not conducive to reasonable discourse. I thought you
believed in reasonable discourse, and preferred a NG without flames,
where discussion could be civil. Even if you disagreed with my post,
it definitely was reasonable discourse and was not a flame.


Go pee up a rope, Reggie. Your years of crappy behavior here
disqualify you from participating in "reasonable discourse."

Is that the best a Yale graduate can do? Did you and GWB attend the same
communications classes?

I am ignoring Harry, so I missed his comment. I hope he takes the hint
and stops trying to talk to me because I am ignoring him.

As a student of politics...
 

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Jim wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Jim wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:


I was discussing "policy," crap-for-brains. Because of the
similarities in policy between Bush and McCain, McCain is being
referred to as McBush.

Why don't you crawl back up your ass, where you belong, and go off
and haunt some newsgroup where full-time snarkiness is appreciated?

Your reply is not conducive to reasonable discourse. I thought you
believed in reasonable discourse, and preferred a NG without flames,
where discussion could be civil. Even if you disagreed with my post,
it definitely was reasonable discourse and was not a flame.


Go pee up a rope, Reggie. Your years of crappy behavior here
disqualify you from participating in "reasonable discourse."

Is that the best a Yale graduate can do? Did you and GWB attend the
same communications classes?


"reggie," aka crap-for-brains, gets the treatment from me he deserves,
as do you, cyst-breath. If you don't like it, you are welcome to come up
here and try to punch me in the nose.

Another juvenile remark from a supposed Yale attendee. Grow up Harry. Set
an example that you would like the rest of us to emulate.


GPUAR, pus-breath.

Another fine indicator of your maturity, Harry.

As a student of politics...
 

Jim wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Jim wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Jim wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:


I was discussing "policy," crap-for-brains. Because of the
similarities in policy between Bush and McCain, McCain is being
referred to as McBush.

Why don't you crawl back up your ass, where you belong, and go
off and haunt some newsgroup where full-time snarkiness is
appreciated?

Your reply is not conducive to reasonable discourse. I thought
you believed in reasonable discourse, and preferred a NG without
flames, where discussion could be civil. Even if you disagreed
with my post, it definitely was reasonable discourse and was not
a flame.


Go pee up a rope, Reggie. Your years of crappy behavior here
disqualify you from participating in "reasonable discourse."

Is that the best a Yale graduate can do? Did you and GWB attend the
same communications classes?


"reggie," aka crap-for-brains, gets the treatment from me he
deserves, as do you, cyst-breath. If you don't like it, you are
welcome to come up here and try to punch me in the nose.

Another juvenile remark from a supposed Yale attendee. Grow up Harry.
Set an example that you would like the rest of us to emulate.


GPUAR, pus-breath.

Another fine indicator of your maturity, Harry.


I learned it from your posts here of the last few months, pus-breath.

As a student of politics...
 

Jim wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Jim wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Jim wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Jim wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:


I was discussing "policy," crap-for-brains. Because of the
similarities in policy between Bush and McCain, McCain is
being referred to as McBush.

Why don't you crawl back up your ass, where you belong, and go
off and haunt some newsgroup where full-time snarkiness is
appreciated?

Your reply is not conducive to reasonable discourse. I thought
you believed in reasonable discourse, and preferred a NG
without flames, where discussion could be civil. Even if you
disagreed with my post, it definitely was reasonable discourse
and was not a flame.


Go pee up a rope, Reggie. Your years of crappy behavior here
disqualify you from participating in "reasonable discourse."

Is that the best a Yale graduate can do? Did you and GWB attend
the same communications classes?


"reggie," aka crap-for-brains, gets the treatment from me he
deserves, as do you, cyst-breath. If you don't like it, you are
welcome to come up here and try to punch me in the nose.

Another juvenile remark from a supposed Yale attendee. Grow up
Harry. Set an example that you would like the rest of us to emulate.


GPUAR, pus-breath.

Another fine indicator of your maturity, Harry.


I learned it from your posts here of the last few months, pus-breath.

I've had enough of this childishness.

yeah, it does get old doesn't it. same old same old.