http://myfwc.com/boating/waterways/I...amagedSign.jpg

The FWC operates an on-call response program to coordinate the timely
examination, evaluation and appropriate repair of FWC assets that
represent a potential hazard to navigation. This type of response
system provides an efficient notification process for directing
personnel to evaluate issues and take appropriate action. In some
cases, this may involve passing on reports of non-FWC related waterway
problems to another responsible entity such as the United States Coast
Guard.



IF YOU SEE A DAMAGED FWC SIGN OR BUOY PLEASE REPORT IT! CALL:
1-866-405-BUOY (2869)
or email



When a damaged sign or buoy is reported by telephone to 1-866-405-BUOY
or by email to :

FWC will assess the problem.
FWC will identify/mark it, if it presents a potential hazard to
navigation.
FWC will work to fix the problem.

Information to have when calling/emailing:

Location of damaged marker (GPS coordinates, waterbody name, nearby
landmarks, county, nearest city or town, etc.)

Brief description of the problem
Your name and contact information








For more information about this program, please contact:

FWC, Boating and Waterways Section
Division of Law Enforcement
620 South Meridian Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1600
(850) 488-5600

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
On Mar 25, 4:14 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:33:58 -0700 (PDT), sailmonstermomma

wrote:
FWC will identify/mark it, if it presents a potential hazard to
navigation.
Most FWC signs *are* a hazard to navigation.

. _ _ . / . _ . . / . / . _ / . . . / . / give us a break. I
am watching folks give me crap because what? My insults are not vulgar
enough? Links to silly pictures without real context, folks selling
memory sticks, and some sailboat site spammer, all unchallenged and
you are all telling me to stop tagging spam? Screw it, guess I am not
an 'us", so I must be a "them".. so be it..



Who said your insults were not vulgar enough?

justwait shouldn't compare himself to the JohnHs, the W Smithers or Diaper
Dans of the group.
You don't want to beat them at their game if you value your soul.

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:33:58 -0700 (PDT), sailmonstermomma
wrote:

FWC will identify/mark it, if it presents a potential hazard to
navigation.

Most FWC signs *are* a hazard to navigation.

Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:33:58 -0700 (PDT), sailmonstermomma
wrote:

FWC will identify/mark it, if it presents a potential hazard to
navigation.

Most FWC signs *are* a hazard to navigation.



Poor Whine: he just can't tolerate sharing his space with wildlife.

On Mar 25, 4:14*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:33:58 -0700 (PDT), sailmonstermomma

wrote:
FWC will identify/mark it, if it presents a potential hazard to
navigation.

Most FWC signs *are* a hazard to navigation.

. _ _ . / . _ . . / . / . _ / . . . / . / give us a break. I
am watching folks give me crap because what? My insults are not vulgar
enough? Links to silly pictures without real context, folks selling
memory sticks, and some sailboat site spammer, all unchallenged and
you are all telling me to stop tagging spam? Screw it, guess I am not
an 'us", so I must be a "them".. so be it..

wrote:
On Mar 25, 4:14 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:33:58 -0700 (PDT), sailmonstermomma

wrote:
FWC will identify/mark it, if it presents a potential hazard to
navigation.
Most FWC signs *are* a hazard to navigation.

. _ _ . / . _ . . / . / . _ / . . . / . / give us a break. I
am watching folks give me crap because what? My insults are not vulgar
enough? Links to silly pictures without real context, folks selling
memory sticks, and some sailboat site spammer, all unchallenged and
you are all telling me to stop tagging spam? Screw it, guess I am not
an 'us", so I must be a "them".. so be it..



Who said your insults were not vulgar enough?

On Mar 25, 4:13*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

. ..





wrote:
On Mar 25, 4:14 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:33:58 -0700 (PDT), sailmonstermomma

wrote:
FWC will identify/mark it, if it presents a potential hazard to
navigation.
Most FWC signs *are* a hazard to navigation.

*. _ _ . */ *. _ . . */ . / . _ */ . . . / . / * *give us a break. I
am watching folks give me crap because what? My insults are not vulgar
enough? Links to silly pictures without real context, folks selling
memory sticks, and some sailboat site spammer, all unchallenged and
you are all telling me to stop tagging spam? Screw it, guess I am not
an 'us", so I must be a "them".. so be it..

Who said your insults were not vulgar enough?

justwait shouldn't compare himself to the JohnHs, the W Smithers or Diaper
Dans of the group.
You don't want to beat them at their game if you value your soul.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh no, I am the scourge of the news group, just ask our newly
converted net nannys

wrote:
On Mar 25, 4:13 pm, "Don White" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

. ..





wrote:
On Mar 25, 4:14 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:33:58 -0700 (PDT), sailmonstermomma
wrote:
FWC will identify/mark it, if it presents a potential hazard to
navigation.
Most FWC signs *are* a hazard to navigation.
. _ _ . / . _ . . / . / . _ / . . . / . / give us a break. I
am watching folks give me crap because what? My insults are not vulgar
enough? Links to silly pictures without real context, folks selling
memory sticks, and some sailboat site spammer, all unchallenged and
you are all telling me to stop tagging spam? Screw it, guess I am not
an 'us", so I must be a "them".. so be it..
Who said your insults were not vulgar enough?
justwait shouldn't compare himself to the JohnHs, the W Smithers or Diaper
Dans of the group.
You don't want to beat them at their game if you value your soul.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh no, I am the scourge of the news group, just ask our newly
converted net nannys



Tell you what...put your head down on the turnpike, have it run over a
few times, and then log on as Loogy. *Then* you can be the scourge. :)

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Mar 25, 4:13 pm, "Don White" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

. ..





wrote:
On Mar 25, 4:14 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:33:58 -0700 (PDT), sailmonstermomma
wrote:
FWC will identify/mark it, if it presents a potential hazard to
navigation.
Most FWC signs *are* a hazard to navigation.
. _ _ . / . _ . . / . / . _ / . . . / . / give us a break. I
am watching folks give me crap because what? My insults are not vulgar
enough? Links to silly pictures without real context, folks selling
memory sticks, and some sailboat site spammer, all unchallenged and
you are all telling me to stop tagging spam? Screw it, guess I am not
an 'us", so I must be a "them".. so be it..
Who said your insults were not vulgar enough?
justwait shouldn't compare himself to the JohnHs, the W Smithers or Diaper
Dans of the group.
You don't want to beat them at their game if you value your soul.- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh no, I am the scourge of the news group, just ask our newly
converted net nannys
============

And yet another "on topic" thread goes down the drain...............




Chuck's place...more on-topic informative stuff there, no snarks.

On Mar 25, 5:07*pm, "JimH" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Mar 25, 4:14 pm, Wayne.B wrote:

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:33:58 -0700 (PDT), sailmonstermomma

wrote:
FWC will identify/mark it, if it presents a potential hazard to
navigation.

Most FWC signs *are* a hazard to navigation.

*. _ _ . */ *. _ . . */ . / . _ */ . . . / . / * *give us a break. I
am watching folks give me crap because what? My insults are not vulgar
enough? Links to silly pictures without real context, folks selling
memory sticks, and some sailboat site spammer, all unchallenged and
you are all telling me to stop tagging spam? Screw it, guess I am not
an 'us", so I must be a "them".. so be it..
======================

Scott, you need some time away from here. *This post of yours (in an on
topic thread) makes no sense.

Chill.

Yeah, you are right. I will immediately start operating my boats in
this manner...