Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2007
Posts: 13,347
Default In case you didn't know...

The long axis of the orbit of Mercury precesses by 43 arc-secs per
century. This value was correctly predicted by Einstein's theory, but
not by Newton.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 160
Default In case you didn't know...


"HK" wrote in message
...
The long axis of the orbit of Mercury precesses by 43 arc-secs per
century. This value was correctly predicted by Einstein's theory, but not
by Newton.


Harry Karusie
Expert-at-Large
Have Wikipedia, Will Travel


  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 477
Default In case you didn't know...

"HK" wrote
The long axis of the orbit of Mercury precesses by 43 arc-secs per
century. This value was correctly predicted by Einstein's theory, but not
by Newton.


Does your Einstein have a cookie named after him? Hmm?


  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2007
Posts: 13,347
Default In case you didn't know...

Ernest Scribbler wrote:
"HK" wrote
The long axis of the orbit of Mercury precesses by 43 arc-secs per
century. This value was correctly predicted by Einstein's theory, but not
by Newton.


Does your Einstein have a cookie named after him? Hmm?




Up your fig.

As a point of fact, I have a buddy whose email "tags" contain
ever-changing scientific tidbits. This was one of them.

  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,892
Default In case you didn't know...

On Mar 15, 1:19*pm, HK wrote:
Ernest Scribbler wrote:
"HK" wrote
The long axis of the orbit of Mercury precesses by 43 arc-secs per
century. This value was correctly predicted by Einstein's theory, but not
by Newton.


Does your Einstein have a cookie named after him? Hmm?


Up your fig.

As a point of fact, I have a buddy whose email "tags" contain
ever-changing scientific tidbits. This was one of them.


Wow, you didn't even have to Google search to try and make people here
believe you actually know something.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
In case you haven't heard... HK General 30 February 12th 08 12:51 AM
What to do in case of a mutiny ??? bob General 0 June 26th 05 02:48 PM
In case you ever need to know this ... Joe Blizzard General 7 September 29th 04 11:25 PM
In case you missed it... Bobsprit ASA 0 May 6th 04 09:49 PM
The case for Bush is the case against him Jim General 4 March 7th 04 07:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017