![]() |
Loogy blows his nose here again
On Mar 5, 7:29*am, HK wrote:
wrote: On Mar 4, 5:11 pm, HK wrote: wrote: On Mar 4, 4:28 pm, wrote: On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote: "secretagent" wrote in message om... "John H." wrote in message news:8adrs3t5sr4a9olmlfeihhufcce8iui55n@4ax. com... On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK wrote: N.L. Eckert wrote: Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era had high draft lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH! If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry asserts that his name was "removed from the list". Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why Harry owes you or anybody else an explanation. ================================== He once told me that he had a college deferment and that kept him off the list for that time. *That was the case with a lot of people at the time, including my district manager. And, you know what? *I don't blame them one damn bit!! * I would have avoided that war as quickly as anyone. *Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the worst wars imaginable and the expected the youth of the country to go fight it. And for what?? * There was no winner, *only a lot of losers..... Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and my draft status *changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly never "dodged" the draft. Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got drafted? Dear Dumb John: You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked and answered. It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip three-fourths of a post before replying. -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** * * * * *John H He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he? I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to you, Booger, Herring and Reggie.... Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his past/present life? I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but not grown men. You are all making an ass of yourself. *Grow up.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to melt...;)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'd get along fine with Harry if it weren't for his incessant lies...... For you to get along with me, I'd have to want to get along with you. For the most part, I don't associate with dumb turds like you. So, there is little chance you would "get along with" me.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How refined and cultured.....- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I take it you just can't help it? |
What are you doing, Harry?
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:28:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread? Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you changed it to 1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then 2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers", 3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers" 4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers" 5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new" 6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring" 7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin" 8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra" 9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida" 10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida" 11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida 12) More nastiness from 'Reggie' 13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness 14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences 15) Herring plays kissy-face 16) Herring claims he can't stand himself. 17) Herring: nothng about boats. Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought Tim, I think he's trying to make a name for himself. Somehow, I haven't seen most of those titles. All I've been seeing is his 'HK', which is more than enough. |
What are you doing, Harry?
On Mar 5, 7:35*am, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:28:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread? Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you changed it to 1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then 2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers", 3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers" 4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers" 5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new" 6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring" 7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin" 8) *"Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra" 9) *"More trash from :Jim in Florida" 10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida" 11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida 12) More nastiness from 'Reggie' 13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness 14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences 15) Herring plays kissy-face 16) Herring claims he can't stand himself. 17) Herring: nothng about *boats. Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, *my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought Tim, I think he's trying to make a name for himself. Somehow, I haven't seen most of those titles. All I've been seeing is his 'HK', which is more than enough.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - John here's whe us gold fish see: in the upper right of the first column, click sort by date, then follow the thread down, you'll see what I'm talking about. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...5d6?scoring=d& |
What are you doing, Harry?
Tim wrote:
Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread? Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you changed it to 1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then 2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers", 3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers" 4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers" 5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new" 6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring" 7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin" 8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra" 9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida" 10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida" 11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida 12) More nastiness from 'Reggie' 13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness 14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences 15) Herring plays kissy-face 16) Herring claims he can't stand himself. 17) Herring: nothng about boats. Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the postings. If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go into "attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all! |
Herring in attack mode, as usual.
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:28:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread? Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you changed it to 1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then 2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers", 3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers" 4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers" 5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new" 6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring" 7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin" 8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra" 9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida" 10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida" 11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida 12) More nastiness from 'Reggie' 13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness 14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences 15) Herring plays kissy-face 16) Herring claims he can't stand himself. 17) Herring: nothng about boats. Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought Tim, I think he's trying to make a name for himself. Somehow, I haven't seen most of those titles. All I've been seeing is his 'HK', which is more than enough. |
What are you doing, Harry?
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:39:04 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
On Mar 5, 7:35*am, John H. wrote: On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:28:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread? Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you changed it to 1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then 2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers", 3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers" 4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers" 5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new" 6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring" 7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin" 8) *"Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra" 9) *"More trash from :Jim in Florida" 10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida" 11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida 12) More nastiness from 'Reggie' 13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness 14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences 15) Herring plays kissy-face 16) Herring claims he can't stand himself. 17) Herring: nothng about *boats. Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, *my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought Tim, I think he's trying to make a name for himself. Somehow, I haven't seen most of those titles. All I've been seeing is his 'HK', which is more than enough.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - John here's whe us gold fish see: in the upper right of the first column, click sort by date, then follow the thread down, you'll see what I'm talking about. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...5d6?scoring=d& Damn! I'm glad I've got Agent. If you want it, let me know. I think I can fix you up, but it's an old version. |
Herring pimps for Agent
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:39:04 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Mar 5, 7:35 am, John H. wrote: On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:28:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread? Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you changed it to 1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then 2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers", 3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers" 4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers" 5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new" 6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring" 7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin" 8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra" 9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida" 10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida" 11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida 12) More nastiness from 'Reggie' 13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness 14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences 15) Herring plays kissy-face 16) Herring claims he can't stand himself. 17) Herring: nothng about boats. Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought Tim, I think he's trying to make a name for himself. Somehow, I haven't seen most of those titles. All I've been seeing is his 'HK', which is more than enough.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - John here's whe us gold fish see: in the upper right of the first column, click sort by date, then follow the thread down, you'll see what I'm talking about. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...5d6?scoring=d& Damn! I'm glad I've got Agent. If you want it, let me know. I think I can fix you up, but it's an old version. |
Florida Jim morphs into attack dog
JimH wrote:
"secretagent" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... "secretagent" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Mar 4, 5:04 pm, wrote: On Mar 4, 4:28 pm, wrote: On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote: "secretagent" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK wrote: N.L. Eckert wrote: Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era had high draft lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH! If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry asserts that his name was "removed from the list". Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why Harry owes you or anybody else an explanation. ================================== He once told me that he had a college deferment and that kept him off the list for that time. That was the case with a lot of people at the time, including my district manager. And, you know what? I don't blame them one damn bit!! I would have avoided that war as quickly as anyone. Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the worst wars imaginable and the expected the youth of the country to go fight it. And for what?? There was no winner, only a lot of losers..... Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and my draft status changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly never "dodged" the draft. Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got drafted? Dear Dumb John: You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked and answered. It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip three-fourths of a post before replying. -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** John H He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he? I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to you, Booger, Herring and Reggie.... Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his past/present life? I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but not grown men. You are all making an ass of yourself. Grow up.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to melt...;)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'd get along fine with Harry if it weren't for his incessant lies.....- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But he is just another sock puppet, here to play... Let me retell a story of an interview I saw just after the Imus, ho, comments. I think it might have been Dave Chappelle (sp?), a black actor was being interviewed. The comment to me was actually life altering... He said simply: "It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think about it... ========= Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. To you it is a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is acceptable. That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter. Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off American Idol............. ;-) It started before you got on board Jim. Harry was doing the exact same dog and pony show when I first looked at the group years ago. His straight men have changed over the years but he hasn't. The nastiness you see from some of us is drawn out by old Harry boy himself. You want to change the tone of the group, change Harry or get rid of him. I tried to put some heat under his tail but apparently it didn't work. I was counting on him having a modicum of self respect but I couldn't find any in him. There is no way to get to this man. He's like an empty head with a wind up mouth. I give up. I remember a post from Dick (Eiscboch) a while back regarding you (Florida Jim) stating "when Jim speaks, folks listen". He was talking about your knowledge of marine engines. Until recently I saw nothing to prove that statement wrong. You then morphed into a Harry attack dog, even going to the extreme of changing your handle a couple of times. Go back to your roots Jim. Otherwise you look like a Booger, Herring or Reggie. I recall you getting mad at a certain someone because he has more stuff than you. I see you attacking Harry one day and sticking your nose up his butt the next. I see you as rather two faced. Now do you really think I value your thoughts? Nitey nite. Don't let the bed bugs bite. You are an immature asshole Jim. See ya! Hmmm. I don't recall Florida Jim having any special knowledge of marine engines. |
What are you doing, Harry?
"Tim" wrote in message ... John here's whe us gold fish see: in the upper right of the first column, click sort by date, then follow the thread down, you'll see what I'm talking about. Methinks somebody is playing games with his computer. And it's not Harry. Eisboch |
What are you doing, Harry?
"HK" wrote in message ... I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the postings. If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go into "attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all! Guess maybe I was wrong. Surprised, but wrong. Eisboch |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com