Harry wants me...
 

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 19:52:05 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Mar 4, 10:43*pm, "JimH" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Mar 4, 10:05 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here





wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:00 pm, "JimH" wrote:

"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========

Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. To you it
is
a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is
acceptable.

That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.

Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off
American Idol.............

Uh, no I don't. I rarely argue, I try to debate. Personal attacks are
not my forte either (except for drunken joe who I truly dislike).. I
do however respect the freedom of speech of others here...

I do think it is funny that JimH who has made up lies about Chuck
posting his home phone number just so he could argue and launch a
personal attach on Chuck is lecturing you about arguing. Even when
many people stated that Chuck never posted his telephone, JimH just kept
on lying, only when someone posted a photo of the original web page that
was saved on his server, did JimH suddenly decide to apologize.

JimH, the guy who insisted Harry was stalking him and making personal
threats to him and his wife, is now wondering if personal attacking
members is acceptable. While Harry has made many derogatory comments,
about many people, he never stalked JimH nor made any threats to him or
his wife. This is the guy who wants to slap your wrist about having a
lively debate.

JimH the guy who has pulled Bassy/Loogy strings for years and many
hundreds of post, by making insulting and derogatory personal comments
about Bassy/Loggy's wife and family, now wants to play the martyr, and
make more lies about other people insulting his wife.

It is funny watching JimH, he really is an interesting "character".- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dude really did all that, holy ****....??
=============
There are always 2 sides to a story Scott. * I posted my response to Reggies
lies.

I guess I can now call him a liar.

BTW: *Do you know Reggie's and Booger's first names? *I am not asking for
their full names, as they know mine...........just their first names. *If
so.......will you post them?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I do, but I would never post them. I live here by the "stays in Vegas"
rule. Info I am offered off list, stays off list... period.

Very wise.

Reggie's Pot Stirring - nothing new
 

On Mar 4, 10:37*pm, "JimH" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...





Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:00 pm, "JimH" wrote:

*"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========

Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. *To you
it is
a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is
acceptable.

That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.

Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off
American Idol.............

Uh, no I don't. I rarely argue, I try to debate. Personal attacks are
not my forte either (except for drunken joe who I truly dislike).. I
do however respect the freedom of speech of others here...

I do think it is funny that JimH who has made up lies about Chuck posting
his home phone number just so he could argue and launch a personal attach
on Chuck is lecturing you about arguing. * Even when many people stated
that Chuck never posted his telephone, JimH just kept on lying, only when
someone posted a photo of the original web page that was saved on his
server, did JimH suddenly decide to apologize.

*JimH, the guy who insisted Harry was stalking him and making personal
threats to him and his wife, is now wondering if personal attacking
members is acceptable. *While Harry has made many derogatory comments,
about many people, he never stalked JimH nor made any threats to him or
his wife. *This is the guy who wants to slap your wrist about having a
lively debate.

JimH the guy who has pulled Bassy/Loogy strings for years and many
hundreds of post, by making insulting and derogatory personal comments
about Bassy/Loggy's wife and family, now wants to play the martyr, and
make more lies about other people insulting his wife.

It is funny watching JimH, he really is an interesting "character".

Once.......sorry for posting through you Harry.

To address the allegations of Reggie:

1. *I indeed lied about Chuck posting my address. *I admitted to the lie and
apologized to Chuck. *Chuck accepted my apology. *I would rather be a liar,
as 99.9% of people are, than a person who mocks health conditions of others.

2. *I indeed pulled/pulls Bassy/Loogy/Booger strings, as you and Herring did
for years and many hundreds of posts.

3. *You need to get a life.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Jim, you repeatedly lied about my wife and children. That's as low as
a man can go. You proved yourself nothing but gutter trash by doing so.

Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin'
 

On Mar 4, 10:34*pm, HK wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 4, 10:05 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:00 pm, "JimH" wrote:
*"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========
Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. *To
you it is
a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is
acceptable.
That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.
Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off
American Idol............. *
Uh, no I don't. I rarely argue, I try to debate. Personal attacks are
not my forte either (except for drunken joe who I truly dislike).. I
do however respect the freedom of speech of others here...
I do think it is funny that JimH who has made up lies about Chuck
posting his home phone number just so he could argue and launch a
personal attach on Chuck is lecturing you about arguing. * Even when
many people stated that Chuck never posted his telephone, JimH just kept
on lying, only when someone posted a photo of the original web page that
was saved on his server, did JimH suddenly decide to apologize.

* JimH, the guy who insisted Harry was stalking him and making personal
threats to him and his wife, is now wondering if personal attacking
members is acceptable. *While Harry has made many derogatory comments,
about many people, he never stalked JimH nor made any threats to him or
his wife. *This is the guy who wants to slap your wrist about having a
lively debate.

JimH the guy who has pulled Bassy/Loogy strings for years and many
hundreds of post, by making insulting and derogatory personal comments
about Bassy/Loggy's wife and family, now wants to play the martyr, and
make more lies about other people insulting his wife.

It is funny watching JimH, he really is an interesting "character".-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dude really did all that, holy ****....??

I'd just *love* to run into Reggie in one of my "blue collar" bars and
take bet on how long it takes for someone to make him eat a dirt sandwich.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'll take you up on that, Harry.

Harry wants me...
 

On Mar 4, 10:27*pm, wrote:
On Mar 4, 10:05*pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here





wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:00 pm, "JimH" wrote:

*"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========

Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. *To you it is
a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is
acceptable.

That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.

Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off
American Idol............. *

Uh, no I don't. I rarely argue, I try to debate. Personal attacks are
not my forte either (except for drunken joe who I truly dislike).. I
do however respect the freedom of speech of others here...

I do think it is funny that JimH who has made up lies about Chuck
posting his home phone number just so he could argue and launch a
personal attach on Chuck is lecturing you about arguing. * Even when
many people stated that Chuck never posted his telephone, JimH just kept
on lying, only when someone posted a photo of the original web page that
was saved on his server, did JimH suddenly decide to apologize.

* JimH, the guy who insisted Harry was stalking him and making personal
threats to him and his wife, is now wondering if personal attacking
members is acceptable. *While Harry has made many derogatory comments,
about many people, he never stalked JimH nor made any threats to him or
his wife. *This is the guy who wants to slap your wrist about having a
lively debate.

JimH the guy who has pulled Bassy/Loogy strings for years and many
hundreds of post, by making insulting and derogatory personal comments
about Bassy/Loggy's wife and family, now wants to play the martyr, and
make more lies about other people insulting his wife.

It is funny watching JimH, he really is an interesting "character".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dude really did all that, holy ****....??- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes, he did, and worse. How ya feeling, by the way?

Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
 

On Mar 4, 9:59*pm, wrote:
On Mar 4, 9:54*pm, A. B. Negative wrote:





On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:32:05 -0800 (PST),

wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:56*pm, A. B. Negative wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:38:59 -0800 (PST),

wrote:
To suggest that I have ever engaged in the sexually perverted insults
thrown around here is dishonest, nothing less... I thought you were
better than that...

Jeff Gordon is still gay. :)

Got me there, I guess that was pretty vulgar, directed at someone
here, and of course, said with malicious intent. Yup, I should be
ashamed of my self, lucky I hide behind a sock puppet so I don't have
to be accountable for what I say here.. oh wait... forget it...

His car is gay too. *:)

Now that's just wierd. Is it the colors, or the bowtie?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes.

Loogy blows his nose here...again
 

More on 'gay' stock car racers
 

Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
 

On Mar 4, 5:11*pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 4, 4:28 pm, wrote:
On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote:

"secretagent" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK wrote:
N.L. Eckert wrote:
Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era had high draft
lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH!
If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry asserts that
his
name was "removed from the list".
Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why Harry owes you or
anybody else an explanation.
==================================
He once told me that he had a college deferment and that kept him off
the list for that time. *That was the case with a lot of people at
the
time, including my district manager. And, you know what? *I don't
blame
them one damn bit!! * I would have avoided that war as quickly as
anyone. *Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the worst wars
imaginable and the expected the youth of the country to go fight it.
And for what?? * There was no winner, *only a lot of losers......
Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and my draft
status
*changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly never
"dodged"
the draft.
Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got drafted?
Dear Dumb John:
You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked and answered.
It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip three-fourths of
a
post before replying.
--
***** Hope your day is better than decent! *****
* * * * *John H
He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a
twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with
the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I
guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he?
I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to you, Booger,
Herring and Reggie....
Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his past/present life?
I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but not grown men.
You are all making an ass of yourself. *Grow up.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a
while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it
too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to
melt...;)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'd get along fine with Harry if it weren't for his incessant lies.....

For you to get along with me, I'd have to want to get along with you.
For the most part, I don't associate with dumb turds like you. So, there
is little chance you would "get along with" me.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

How refined and cultured.....

What are you doing, Harry?
 

Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread?

Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you
changed it to
1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then
2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers",
3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers"
4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers"
5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new"
6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring"
7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin"
8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra"
9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida"
10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida"
11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida
12) More nastiness from 'Reggie'
13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness
14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences
15) Herring plays kissy-face
16) Herring claims he can't stand himself.
17) Herring: nothng about boats.

Why, Harry?


I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?

Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.

Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?

Just a thought

Loogy blows his nose here again