Harry wants me...
 

JimH wrote:


- Show quoted text -

Dude really did all that, holy ****....??
=============
There are always 2 sides to a story Scott. I posted my response to Reggies
lies.

Of course there are two sides to a story. In this case, there is your
side, and then there is the truth.

Now can you show me the post where I commented about your back or your wife?

Of course I can find 100's where you accused Harry of stalking you and
threating you and your wife.

More nastiness from 'Reggie'
 

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
"secretagent" wrote in message
JimH wrote:
I recall you getting mad at a certain someone because he has more
stuff than you.

ROTFLMAO. Not true.

JimH (Ohwoeisme)

Sure it is. Certainly you remember going on one of your tirades
directed at Eisboch because he made a post about one of his new toys.
While he was just sharing his enjoyment, you felt like he should not
flaunt his wealth, a that he was bragging too much.

I see you attacking Harry one day and sticking your nose up his butt
the next. I see you as rather two faced. Now do you really think I
value your thoughts? Nitey nite. Don't let the bed bugs bite.

See if you can find the man you once were as you have morphed into a
sad pile of crap.

Now I am not certain, but I do think this would qualify as a personal
attack on your part.

While it would be very easy for me to Google your posts about Chucks
email, your 100's of personal insult directed towards Bassy/Loogy wife
and kids, your posts about Harry stalking and making threats towards you
and your wife etc, your ridiculing Don for taking care of his mother
etc, you will not be able to find one posts where I commented about your
back or your wife.

Ohwoeisme, don't you think everyone in here has your number?

Reggie: No boating, plenty'o'nastiness
 

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
JimH wrote:


- Show quoted text -

Dude really did all that, holy ****....??
=============
There are always 2 sides to a story Scott. I posted my response to
Reggies lies.

Of course there are two sides to a story. In this case, there is your
side, and then there is the truth.

Now can you show me the post where I commented about your back or your
wife?

Of course I can find 100's where you accused Harry of stalking you and
threating you and your wife.

Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
 

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:38:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Mar 4, 8:29*pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:01:04 -0500, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:28:58 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote:
"secretagent" wrote in message

m...

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK wrote:
N.L. Eckert wrote:
Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era had high draft
lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH!
If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry asserts that
his
name was "removed from the list".
Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why Harry owes you or
anybody else an explanation.
==================================
He once told me that he had a college deferment and that kept him off
the list for that time. *That was the case with a lot of people at
the
time, including my district manager. And, you know what? *I don't
blame
them one damn bit!! * I would have avoided that war as quickly as
anyone. *Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the worst wars
imaginable and the expected the youth of the country to go fight it.
And for what?? * There was no winner, *only a lot of losers.....
Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and my draft
status
*changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly never
"dodged"
the draft.
Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got drafted?
Dear Dumb John:
You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked and answered.
It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip three-fourths of
a
post before replying.
--
***** Hope your day is better than decent! *****
* * * * *John H
He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a
twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with
the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I
guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he?
I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to you, Booger,
Herring and Reggie....

Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his past/present life?
I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but not grown men.
You are all making an ass of yourself. *Grow up.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a
while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it
too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to
melt...;)

Sparring with soft butter is much more fun, and more mentally stimulating.

We just *know* where you slather on that soft butter, and there is no
question for you it is more stimulating.

Do you three think of nothing else?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

To suggest that I have ever engaged in the sexually perverted insults
thrown around here is dishonest, nothing less... I thought you were
better than that...

You don't qualify to be one of the 'you three' mentioned! That comment was
to Harry and his two sidekicks, who manage to find sexual innuendos in
aircraft carriers.

Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
 

On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:51:17 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:25:11 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:57:19 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:06:52 -0500, "secretagent"
wrote:

He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a twist
of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with the girls.
And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I guess we should
believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he?

It was 40+ years ago - a whole different lifetime.

I'm not defending Harry, but get a freakin' life.

Nobody cares anymore.

I got out of the service almost 20 years ago. Yet Harry receives no flak
for his derogatory comments about same, whether mine or anyone else's.

Because it doesn't matter what Harry thinks.

It's as simple as that.

You served honorably, went above and beyond the call making it a
career and rose to Staff command level.

Why should you care what he thinks? He can make all the idiotic
comments he wants - he has no clue what you had to sacrifice or the
effort made to achieve your Staff level rank.

The only way that achievement can be taken away from you is for you to
take it away from yourself. If you react to his taunts, then he wins
and you look foolish.

I was just a grunt - dumbass Marine, but I would think that an officer
and a gentleman would understand when he's being played and just
ignore it.

Then again, maybe not.

Share the wealth, Tom.

I just did.

You're a great American, Tom.

Herring discusses his sexual preferences
 

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:38:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Mar 4, 8:29 pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:01:04 -0500, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:28:58 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote:
"secretagent" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK wrote:
N.L. Eckert wrote:
Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era had high draft
lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH!
If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry asserts that
his
name was "removed from the list".
Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why Harry owes you or
anybody else an explanation.
==================================
He once told me that he had a college deferment and that kept him off
the list for that time. That was the case with a lot of people at
the
time, including my district manager. And, you know what? I don't
blame
them one damn bit!! I would have avoided that war as quickly as
anyone. Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the worst wars
imaginable and the expected the youth of the country to go fight it.
And for what?? There was no winner, only a lot of losers.....
Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and my draft
status
changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly never
"dodged"
the draft.
Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got drafted?
Dear Dumb John:
You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked and answered.
It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip three-fourths of
a
post before replying.
--
***** Hope your day is better than decent! *****
John H
He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a
twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with
the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I
guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he?
I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to you, Booger,
Herring and Reggie....
Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his past/present life?
I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but not grown men.
You are all making an ass of yourself. Grow up.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a
while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it
too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to
melt...;)
Sparring with soft butter is much more fun, and more mentally stimulating.
We just *know* where you slather on that soft butter, and there is no
question for you it is more stimulating.
Do you three think of nothing else?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
To suggest that I have ever engaged in the sexually perverted insults
thrown around here is dishonest, nothing less... I thought you were
better than that...

You don't qualify to be one of the 'you three' mentioned! That comment was
to Harry and his two sidekicks, who manage to find sexual innuendos in
aircraft carriers.

Herring plays kissy-face
 

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:51:17 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:25:11 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:57:19 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:06:52 -0500, "secretagent"
wrote:

He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a twist
of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with the girls.
And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I guess we should
believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he?
It was 40+ years ago - a whole different lifetime.

I'm not defending Harry, but get a freakin' life.

Nobody cares anymore.
I got out of the service almost 20 years ago. Yet Harry receives no flak
for his derogatory comments about same, whether mine or anyone else's.
Because it doesn't matter what Harry thinks.

It's as simple as that.

You served honorably, went above and beyond the call making it a
career and rose to Staff command level.

Why should you care what he thinks? He can make all the idiotic
comments he wants - he has no clue what you had to sacrifice or the
effort made to achieve your Staff level rank.

The only way that achievement can be taken away from you is for you to
take it away from yourself. If you react to his taunts, then he wins
and you look foolish.

I was just a grunt - dumbass Marine, but I would think that an officer
and a gentleman would understand when he's being played and just
ignore it.

Then again, maybe not.

Share the wealth, Tom.
I just did.

You're a great American, Tom.

Herring claims he can't stand himself.
 

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:05:10 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is
Here wrote:

wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:00 pm, "JimH" wrote:
"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========

Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. To you it is
a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is
acceptable.

That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.

Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off
American Idol.............
Uh, no I don't. I rarely argue, I try to debate. Personal attacks are
not my forte either (except for drunken joe who I truly dislike).. I
do however respect the freedom of speech of others here...
I do think it is funny that JimH who has made up lies about Chuck
posting his home phone number just so he could argue and launch a
personal attach on Chuck is lecturing you about arguing. Even when
many people stated that Chuck never posted his telephone, JimH just kept
on lying, only when someone posted a photo of the original web page that
was saved on his server, did JimH suddenly decide to apologize.

JimH, the guy who insisted Harry was stalking him and making personal
threats to him and his wife, is now wondering if personal attacking
members is acceptable. While Harry has made many derogatory comments,
about many people, he never stalked JimH nor made any threats to him or
his wife. This is the guy who wants to slap your wrist about having a
lively debate.

JimH the guy who has pulled Bassy/Loogy strings for years and many
hundreds of post, by making insulting and derogatory personal comments
about Bassy/Loggy's wife and family, now wants to play the martyr, and
make more lies about other people insulting his wife.

It is funny watching JimH, he really is an interesting "character".


I can't abide liars.

Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
 

On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:05:10 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is
Here wrote:

wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:00 pm, "JimH" wrote:


"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========

Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. To you it is
a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is
acceptable.

That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.

Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off
American Idol.............

Uh, no I don't. I rarely argue, I try to debate. Personal attacks are
not my forte either (except for drunken joe who I truly dislike).. I
do however respect the freedom of speech of others here...

I do think it is funny that JimH who has made up lies about Chuck
posting his home phone number just so he could argue and launch a
personal attach on Chuck is lecturing you about arguing. Even when
many people stated that Chuck never posted his telephone, JimH just kept
on lying, only when someone posted a photo of the original web page that
was saved on his server, did JimH suddenly decide to apologize.

JimH, the guy who insisted Harry was stalking him and making personal
threats to him and his wife, is now wondering if personal attacking
members is acceptable. While Harry has made many derogatory comments,
about many people, he never stalked JimH nor made any threats to him or
his wife. This is the guy who wants to slap your wrist about having a
lively debate.

JimH the guy who has pulled Bassy/Loogy strings for years and many
hundreds of post, by making insulting and derogatory personal comments
about Bassy/Loggy's wife and family, now wants to play the martyr, and
make more lies about other people insulting his wife.

It is funny watching JimH, he really is an interesting "character".


I can't abide liars.

Herring: nothing about boats
 

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 19:52:05 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Mar 4, 10:43 pm, "JimH" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Mar 4, 10:05 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here





wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:00 pm, "JimH" wrote:
"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========
Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. To you it
is
a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is
acceptable.
That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.
Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off
American Idol.............
Uh, no I don't. I rarely argue, I try to debate. Personal attacks are
not my forte either (except for drunken joe who I truly dislike).. I
do however respect the freedom of speech of others here...
I do think it is funny that JimH who has made up lies about Chuck
posting his home phone number just so he could argue and launch a
personal attach on Chuck is lecturing you about arguing. Even when
many people stated that Chuck never posted his telephone, JimH just kept
on lying, only when someone posted a photo of the original web page that
was saved on his server, did JimH suddenly decide to apologize.
JimH, the guy who insisted Harry was stalking him and making personal
threats to him and his wife, is now wondering if personal attacking
members is acceptable. While Harry has made many derogatory comments,
about many people, he never stalked JimH nor made any threats to him or
his wife. This is the guy who wants to slap your wrist about having a
lively debate.
JimH the guy who has pulled Bassy/Loogy strings for years and many
hundreds of post, by making insulting and derogatory personal comments
about Bassy/Loggy's wife and family, now wants to play the martyr, and
make more lies about other people insulting his wife.
It is funny watching JimH, he really is an interesting "character".- Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Dude really did all that, holy ****....??
=============
There are always 2 sides to a story Scott. I posted my response to Reggies
lies.

I guess I can now call him a liar.

BTW: Do you know Reggie's and Booger's first names? I am not asking for
their full names, as they know mine...........just their first names. If
so.......will you post them?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
I do, but I would never post them. I live here by the "stays in Vegas"
rule. Info I am offered off list, stays off list... period.

Very wise.