A. B. Negative wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:32:05 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Mar 4, 8:56 pm, A. B. Negative wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:38:59 -0800 (PST),

wrote:
To suggest that I have ever engaged in the sexually perverted insults
thrown around here is dishonest, nothing less... I thought you were
better than that...
Jeff Gordon is still gay. :)
Got me there, I guess that was pretty vulgar, directed at someone
here, and of course, said with malicious intent. Yup, I should be
ashamed of my self, lucky I hide behind a sock puppet so I don't have
to be accountable for what I say here.. oh wait... forget it...

His car is gay too. :)

wrote:
On Mar 4, 9:54 pm, A. B. Negative wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:32:05 -0800 (PST),

wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:56 pm, A. B. Negative wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:38:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
To suggest that I have ever engaged in the sexually perverted insults
thrown around here is dishonest, nothing less... I thought you were
better than that...
Jeff Gordon is still gay. :)
Got me there, I guess that was pretty vulgar, directed at someone
here, and of course, said with malicious intent. Yup, I should be
ashamed of my self, lucky I hide behind a sock puppet so I don't have
to be accountable for what I say here.. oh wait... forget it...
His car is gay too. :)

Now that's just wierd. Is it the colors, or the bowtie?

A. B. Negative wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:59:33 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Mar 4, 9:54 pm, A. B. Negative wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:32:05 -0800 (PST),

wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:56 pm, A. B. Negative wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:38:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
To suggest that I have ever engaged in the sexually perverted insults
thrown around here is dishonest, nothing less... I thought you were
better than that...
Jeff Gordon is still gay. :)
Got me there, I guess that was pretty vulgar, directed at someone
here, and of course, said with malicious intent. Yup, I should be
ashamed of my self, lucky I hide behind a sock puppet so I don't have
to be accountable for what I say here.. oh wait... forget it...
His car is gay too. :)
Now that's just wierd. Is it the colors, or the bowtie?

Both.

On Mar 4, 10:02*pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 4, 9:54 pm, A. B. Negative wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:32:05 -0800 (PST),

wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:56 pm, A. B. Negative wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:38:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
To suggest that I have ever engaged in the sexually perverted insults
thrown around here is dishonest, nothing less... I thought you were
better than that...
Jeff Gordon is still gay. :)
Got me there, I guess that was pretty vulgar, directed at someone
here, and of course, said with malicious intent. Yup, I should be
ashamed of my self, lucky I hide behind a sock puppet so I don't have
to be accountable for what I say here.. oh wait... forget it...
His car is gay too. *:)

Now that's just wierd. Is it the colors, or the bowtie?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

must be the bowtie..

wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:00 pm, "JimH" wrote:


"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========

Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. To you it is
a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is
acceptable.

That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.

Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off
American Idol.............

Uh, no I don't. I rarely argue, I try to debate. Personal attacks are
not my forte either (except for drunken joe who I truly dislike).. I
do however respect the freedom of speech of others here...

I do think it is funny that JimH who has made up lies about Chuck
posting his home phone number just so he could argue and launch a
personal attach on Chuck is lecturing you about arguing. Even when
many people stated that Chuck never posted his telephone, JimH just kept
on lying, only when someone posted a photo of the original web page that
was saved on his server, did JimH suddenly decide to apologize.

JimH, the guy who insisted Harry was stalking him and making personal
threats to him and his wife, is now wondering if personal attacking
members is acceptable. While Harry has made many derogatory comments,
about many people, he never stalked JimH nor made any threats to him or
his wife. This is the guy who wants to slap your wrist about having a
lively debate.

JimH the guy who has pulled Bassy/Loogy strings for years and many
hundreds of post, by making insulting and derogatory personal comments
about Bassy/Loggy's wife and family, now wants to play the martyr, and
make more lies about other people insulting his wife.

It is funny watching JimH, he really is an interesting "character".

A. B. Negative wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:38:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

To suggest that I have ever engaged in the sexually perverted insults
thrown around here is dishonest, nothing less... I thought you were
better than that...

Jeff Gordon is still gay. :)

Me thinks you must be insecure on your own sexuality, Why don't
you and Tom just get a room.

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:00 pm, "JimH" wrote:


"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========

Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. To you
it is
a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is
acceptable.

That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.

Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off
American Idol.............

Uh, no I don't. I rarely argue, I try to debate. Personal attacks are
not my forte either (except for drunken joe who I truly dislike).. I
do however respect the freedom of speech of others here...

I do think it is funny that JimH who has made up lies about Chuck
posting his home phone number just so he could argue and launch a
personal attach on Chuck is lecturing you about arguing. Even when
many people stated that Chuck never posted his telephone, JimH just kept
on lying, only when someone posted a photo of the original web page that
was saved on his server, did JimH suddenly decide to apologize.

JimH, the guy who insisted Harry was stalking him and making personal
threats to him and his wife, is now wondering if personal attacking
members is acceptable. While Harry has made many derogatory comments,
about many people, he never stalked JimH nor made any threats to him or
his wife. This is the guy who wants to slap your wrist about having a
lively debate.

JimH the guy who has pulled Bassy/Loogy strings for years and many
hundreds of post, by making insulting and derogatory personal comments
about Bassy/Loggy's wife and family, now wants to play the martyr, and
make more lies about other people insulting his wife.

It is funny watching JimH, he really is an interesting "character".

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
A. B. Negative wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:38:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

To suggest that I have ever engaged in the sexually perverted insults
thrown around here is dishonest, nothing less... I thought you were
better than that...

Jeff Gordon is still gay. :)

Me thinks you must be insecure on your own sexuality, Why don't
you and Tom just get a room.

On Mar 4, 10:05*pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:00 pm, "JimH" wrote:

*"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========

Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. *To you it is
a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is
acceptable.

That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.

Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off
American Idol............. *

Uh, no I don't. I rarely argue, I try to debate. Personal attacks are
not my forte either (except for drunken joe who I truly dislike).. I
do however respect the freedom of speech of others here...

I do think it is funny that JimH who has made up lies about Chuck
posting his home phone number just so he could argue and launch a
personal attach on Chuck is lecturing you about arguing. * Even when
many people stated that Chuck never posted his telephone, JimH just kept
on lying, only when someone posted a photo of the original web page that
was saved on his server, did JimH suddenly decide to apologize.

* JimH, the guy who insisted Harry was stalking him and making personal
threats to him and his wife, is now wondering if personal attacking
members is acceptable. *While Harry has made many derogatory comments,
about many people, he never stalked JimH nor made any threats to him or
his wife. *This is the guy who wants to slap your wrist about having a
lively debate.

JimH the guy who has pulled Bassy/Loogy strings for years and many
hundreds of post, by making insulting and derogatory personal comments
about Bassy/Loggy's wife and family, now wants to play the martyr, and
make more lies about other people insulting his wife.

It is funny watching JimH, he really is an interesting "character".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dude really did all that, holy ****....??

"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Mar 4, 5:04 pm, wrote:
On Mar 4, 4:28 pm, wrote:





On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote:

"secretagent" wrote in message

.. .

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK
wrote:

N.L. Eckert wrote:
Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era had high
draft
lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH!
If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry asserts
that
his
name was "removed from the list".
Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why Harry owes
you or
anybody else an explanation.
==================================
He once told me that he had a college deferment and that kept
him off
the list for that time. That was the case with a lot of people
at
the
time, including my district manager. And, you know what? I
don't
blame
them one damn bit!! I would have avoided that war as quickly
as
anyone. Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the worst wars
imaginable and the expected the youth of the country to go
fight it.
And for what?? There was no winner, only a lot of losers.....

Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and my
draft
status
changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly never
"dodged"
the draft.

Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got drafted?

Dear Dumb John:

You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked and
answered.

It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip
three-fourths of
a
post before replying.
--
***** Hope your day is better than decent! *****

John H

He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed
by a
twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home
with
the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft
dodger. I
guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he?

I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to you,
Booger,
Herring and Reggie....

Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his past/present
life?
I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but not grown
men.
You are all making an ass of yourself. Grow up.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a
while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it
too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to
melt...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'd get along fine with Harry if it weren't for his incessant lies.....-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But he is just another sock puppet, here to play... Let me retell a
story of an interview I saw just after the Imus, ho, comments. I think
it might have been Dave Chappelle (sp?), a black actor was being
interviewed. The comment to me was actually life altering... He said
simply:

"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========

Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. To you it
is a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is
acceptable.

That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.

Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off
American Idol............. ;-)

It started before you got on board Jim. Harry was doing the exact same dog
and pony show when I first looked at the group years ago. His straight men
have changed over the years but he hasn't. The nastiness you see from some
of us is drawn out by old Harry boy himself. You want to change the tone of
the group, change Harry or get rid of him. I tried to put some heat under
his tail but apparently it didn't work. I was counting on him having a
modicum of self respect but I couldn't find any in him. There is no way to
get to this man. He's like an empty head with a wind up mouth. I give up.