Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimH wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... wrote: Some pretty sick comments Harry. Since I am not in charge of who dies in Iraq, it really doesn't matter. But my point stands: the returning soldiers are easily integrated back into society. Mercenaries are not.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How do you know this, just cause you wish it?? As I stated, perhaps too abstract for you. Why not address the question I asked earlier: ------------------------------------ You stated: "The Blackwater boys wear no country's uniform, are not subject to the criminal laws of either Iraq or the United States in performance of their "guard duty" over there, and are working as mercenaries for high pay. They are not *serving* anything but their wallets. They kill and maim over there with impunity and face no criminal justice system for their actions. " -------------------------------- I then asked: "Even if those statements were true, how are they different from terrorist we are fighting. Eh?" --------------------------------------- And your answer is? The simple answer is that neither the Blackwater thugs nor the "terrorist" thugs face an established criminal justice system. But there's a lot more to it than that. |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Feb 12, 2:46 pm, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "camacdonaldiii" wrote in message ... On Feb 12, 7:28 am, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... hell, you might even be able to hit something with it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c&NR=1 -- John H Finally, the perfect weapon for Blackwater's hired cranks. It will widen the pattern of their mistakes, and eliminate pesky witnesses. You know, at some point the Blackwater thugs are going to come home from Iraq and look for the same sorts of high-pay guard jobs here that they had there. Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd take out the Blackwaters. Killing Americans is OK with you? ========================= You never saw Harry say that, or even remotely imply such a thing. If you disagree, be a linguist and a scholar for a minute and point out which specific words or sentences contain the meaning you imagined. Such is a common ailment among the semi-literates who plague this newsgroup and, of course, those who deliberately misconstrue what others post and then give their "miscontructions" a half life approaching plutonium.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Wanna shoot someone who deserves shootin'? Check out the cops in this vid... http://www.11alive.com/video/player.aspx?aid=88569&bw= What is worse is three or more other pigs who saw it and did nothing.. like I said, if you got one dirty cop and 11 more who are afraid to honor their oath to serve and protect, you got a dirty dozen... ========================= Back in the late 1970s, a radio station in Long Island used to air these home-cooked "public service" commercials to poke fun (or worse) at public officials and agencies. One used a really oafish sounding voice saying "Are you big, strong and stupid? The Nassau County Police Department wants you. Come to our job fair....", and finished with the actual direct phone number of the PD's personnel office. The message could've been applicable anywhere in the country. I know a few smart cops, but the morons are the ones who stand out, like the one who completely bungled a burglary investigation here two summers ago. After 5 minutes of talking to this thing in a uniform, it was obvious that the bricks lining my flower bed were trying hard not to laugh at him. How do they get hired? |
#34
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John H." wrote in message
... On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:43:45 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "camacdonaldiii" wrote in message ... On Feb 12, 7:28 am, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . hell, you might even be able to hit something with it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c&NR=1 -- John H Finally, the perfect weapon for Blackwater's hired cranks. It will widen the pattern of their mistakes, and eliminate pesky witnesses. You know, at some point the Blackwater thugs are going to come home from Iraq and look for the same sorts of high-pay guard jobs here that they had there. Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd take out the Blackwaters. Killing Americans is OK with you? ========================= You never saw Harry say that, or even remotely imply such a thing. If you disagree, be a linguist and a scholar for a minute and point out which specific words or sentences contain the meaning you imagined. Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd take out the Blackwaters. ...When did you lose the ability to read and comprehend? Of course, to you and the 'in crowd' these kinds of comments are 'cool'. -- John H Oh. You think that if someone doesn't care about the welfar of Blackwater employees, it means they're OK with Americans in general being killed. That's an incorrect conclusion. You will now disagree. |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Feb 12, 4:59 pm, HK wrote: JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: On Feb 12, 2:34 pm, camacdonaldiii wrote: On Feb 12, 7:28 am, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:haq1r3ttmkqf1dp5cnicr8tcc5pfvlamno@4ax. com... hell, you might even be able to hit something with it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c&NR=1 -- John H Finally, the perfect weapon for Blackwater's hired cranks. It will widen the pattern of their mistakes, and eliminate pesky witnesses. You know, at some point the Blackwater thugs are going to come home from Iraq and look for the same sorts of high-pay guard jobs here that they had there. Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd take out the Blackwaters. Killing Americans is OK with you?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, he just says stuff like that to **** folks off.. No, bird brains, I don't. Let's put it this way: U.S. troops wear this country's uniform, are subject to at least a modest code of justice regarding their behavior in places like Iraq, and are *serving their country* for modest pay. If they screw up badly enough in Iraq in certain situations (like killing innocent civilians), they face trials and possible imprisonment. The Blackwater boys wear no country's uniform, are not subject to the criminal laws of either Iraq or the United States in performance of their "guard duty" over there, and are working as mercenaries for high pay. They are not *serving* anything but their wallets. They kill and maim over there with impunity and face no criminal justice system for their actions. snip Even if those statements were true, how are they different from terrorist we are fighting. Eh? *If* Americans are going to die in Iraq, and apparently they are, I'd rather it be the Blackwater thugs. That way, we'll have fewer of them back home, and fewer problems. Returning soldiers, on the other hand, are simply returning soldiers, and with the proper social services, can be properly integrated back into normal society. Is this too abstract for you? Some pretty sick comments Harry. Since I am not in charge of who dies in Iraq, it really doesn't matter. But my point stands: the returning soldiers are easily integrated back into society. Mercenaries are not.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How do you know this, just cause you wish it?? ======================= You might be able to answer that question yourself. Pretend you work for Blackwater, and your employees are having a tough time recruiting friends via word of mouth, as in "I love this job. You might be right for it, too." You have to write a want ad. What would the want ad say, to attract employees? Show us. Remember that you need to think about the type of people most likely to succeed at the job. |
#36
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JimH" wrote in message
... The Blackwater boys wear no country's uniform, are not subject to the criminal laws of either Iraq or the United States in performance of their "guard duty" over there, and are working as mercenaries for high pay. They are not *serving* anything but their wallets. They kill and maim over there with impunity and face no criminal justice system for their actions. snip Even if those statements were true, how are they different from terrorist we are fighting. Eh? You said "Even if those statements were true", which suggests that some or all of them are NOT true. In the paragraph beginning with "The Blackwater boys", which statements do YOU BELIEVE are not true? |
#37
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 12, 5:21*pm, HK wrote:
JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: Some pretty sick comments Harry. Since I am not in charge of who dies in Iraq, it really doesn't matter. |
#38
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Feb 12, 5:21 pm, HK wrote: JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: Some pretty sick comments Harry. Since I am not in charge of who dies in Iraq, it really doesn't matter. But my point stands: the returning soldiers are easily integrated back into society. Mercenaries are not.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How do you know this, just cause you wish it?? As I stated, perhaps too abstract for you. Why not address the question I asked earlier: ------------------------------------ You stated: "The Blackwater boys wear no country's uniform, are not subject to the criminal laws of either Iraq or the United States in performance of their "guard duty" over there, and are working as mercenaries for high pay. They are not *serving* anything but their wallets. They kill and maim over there with impunity and face no criminal justice system for their actions. " -------------------------------- I then asked: "Even if those statements were true, how are they different from terrorist we are fighting. Eh?" --------------------------------------- And your answer is? The simple answer is that neither the Blackwater thugs nor the "terrorist" thugs face an established criminal justice system. But there's a lot more to it than that.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Just not true, Blackwater employees have been prosecuted.. ======================= http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=3795318&page=1 http://www.reuters.com/article/lates...s/idUSN3094766 http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/...ity/index.html |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 12, 8:59*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:59:13 -0500, HK wrote: Since I am not in charge of who dies in Iraq, it really doesn't matter. But my point stands: the returning soldiers are easily integrated back into society. Mercenaries are not. Harry, the problem with that line of reasoning is, most of Blackwater's mercenaries are recruited from the soldier's ranks. *So, perhaps, some are not so easily integrated back into society. Stop mudging up things with facts, ok? |
#40
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The killer of rbp..... | General | |||
Bug Killer | General | |||
Killer Jellyfish | General | |||
Stump the motor boat Captains | ASA |