On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:55:15 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Feb 12, 2:34*pm, camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Feb 12, 7:28*am, HK wrote:





JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
.. .
hell, you might even be able to hit something with it!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c&NR=1
--
John H

Finally, the perfect weapon for Blackwater's hired cranks. It will widen the
pattern of their mistakes, and eliminate pesky witnesses.

You know, at some point the Blackwater thugs are going to come home from
Iraq and look for the same sorts of high-pay guard jobs here that they
had there. Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a
public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd
take out the Blackwaters.

Killing Americans is OK with you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, he just says stuff like that to **** folks off..

I'm astonished if you really believe that!

This is the guy who gloats any time he can find an article describing the
death of Americans in Iraq! Or, for that matter, the death of Iraqis.
--
John H

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:43:45 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
On Feb 12, 7:28 am, HK wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
.. .
hell, you might even be able to hit something with it!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c&NR=1
--
John H

Finally, the perfect weapon for Blackwater's hired cranks. It will
widen
the
pattern of their mistakes, and eliminate pesky witnesses.

You know, at some point the Blackwater thugs are going to come home from
Iraq and look for the same sorts of high-pay guard jobs here that they
had there. Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a
public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd
take out the Blackwaters.

Killing Americans is OK with you?

=========================


You never saw Harry say that, or even remotely imply such a thing. If you
disagree, be a linguist and a scholar for a minute and point out which
specific words or sentences contain the meaning you imagined.


Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a
public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd
take out the Blackwaters.

...When did you lose the ability to read and comprehend? Of course, to you
and the 'in crowd' these kinds of comments are 'cool'.
--
John H

"take out", as in out for dinner? :-)

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:43:45 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
On Feb 12, 7:28 am, HK wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
.. .
hell, you might even be able to hit something with it!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c&NR=1
--
John H

Finally, the perfect weapon for Blackwater's hired cranks. It will
widen
the
pattern of their mistakes, and eliminate pesky witnesses.

You know, at some point the Blackwater thugs are going to come home
from
Iraq and look for the same sorts of high-pay guard jobs here that they
had there. Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a
public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd
take out the Blackwaters.

Killing Americans is OK with you?

=========================


You never saw Harry say that, or even remotely imply such a thing. If you
disagree, be a linguist and a scholar for a minute and point out which
specific words or sentences contain the meaning you imagined.


Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a
public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd
take out the Blackwaters.

...When did you lose the ability to read and comprehend? Of course, to
you
and the 'in crowd' these kinds of comments are 'cool'.
--
John H

"take out", as in out for dinner? :-)

You'll have to excuse our Johnny. He's od' on Soprano re-runs.

wrote:
On Feb 12, 2:34 pm, camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Feb 12, 7:28 am, HK wrote:





JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
hell, you might even be able to hit something with it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c&NR=1
--
John H
Finally, the perfect weapon for Blackwater's hired cranks. It will widen the
pattern of their mistakes, and eliminate pesky witnesses.
You know, at some point the Blackwater thugs are going to come home from
Iraq and look for the same sorts of high-pay guard jobs here that they
had there. Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a
public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd
take out the Blackwaters.
Killing Americans is OK with you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, he just says stuff like that to **** folks off..


No, bird brains, I don't.

Let's put it this way: U.S. troops wear this country's uniform, are
subject to at least a modest code of justice regarding their behavior in
places like Iraq, and are *serving their country* for modest pay. If
they screw up badly enough in Iraq in certain situations (like killing
innocent civilians), they face trials and possible imprisonment.

The Blackwater boys wear no country's uniform, are not subject to the
criminal laws of either Iraq or the United States in performance of
their "guard duty" over there, and are working as mercenaries for high
pay. They are not *serving* anything but their wallets. They kill and
maim over there with impunity and face no criminal justice system for
their actions. At some point, the war against Iraq will end and these
Blackwater thugs will come home, and probably look for similar work in
which they can misbehave with impunity.

*If* Americans are going to die in Iraq, and apparently they are, I'd
rather it be the Blackwater thugs. That way, we'll have fewer of them
back home, and fewer problems.

Returning soldiers, on the other hand, are simply returning soldiers,
and with the proper social services, can be properly integrated back
into normal society.

Is this too abstract for you?

wrote:
On Feb 12, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
On Feb 12, 7:28 am, HK wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
hell, you might even be able to hit something with it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c&NR=1
--
John H
Finally, the perfect weapon for Blackwater's hired cranks. It will widen
the
pattern of their mistakes, and eliminate pesky witnesses.
You know, at some point the Blackwater thugs are going to come home from
Iraq and look for the same sorts of high-pay guard jobs here that they
had there. Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a
public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd
take out the Blackwaters.
Killing Americans is OK with you?
=========================
You never saw Harry say that, or even remotely imply such a thing. If you
disagree, be a linguist and a scholar for a minute and point out which
specific words or sentences contain the meaning you imagined.
Such is a common ailment among the semi-literates who plague this
newsgroup and, of course, those who deliberately misconstrue what others
post and then give their "miscontructions" a half life approaching
plutonium.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Wanna shoot someone who deserves shootin'? Check out the cops in this
vid...
http://www.11alive.com/video/player.aspx?aid=88569&bw=
What is worse is three or more other pigs who saw it and did nothing..
like I said, if you got one dirty cop and 11 more who are afraid to
honor their oath to serve and protect, you got a dirty dozen...


There's no shortage of dirty cops, but at least they are subject to the
criminal justice system. The Blackwater thugs in IRaq have not been.

On Feb 12, 4:41*pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 12, 2:34 pm, camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Feb 12, 7:28 am, HK wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
m...
hell, you might even be able to hit something with it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c&NR=1
--
John H
Finally, the perfect weapon for Blackwater's hired cranks. It will widen the
pattern of their mistakes, and eliminate pesky witnesses.
You know, at some point the Blackwater thugs are going to come home from
Iraq and look for the same sorts of high-pay guard jobs here that they
had there. Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a
public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd
take out the Blackwaters.
Killing Americans is OK with you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, he just says stuff like that to **** folks off..

No, bird brains, I don't.

Let's put it this way: U.S. troops wear this country's uniform, are
subject to at least a modest code of justice regarding their behavior in
places like Iraq, and are *serving their country* for modest pay. If
they screw up badly enough in Iraq in certain situations (like killing
innocent civilians), they face trials and possible imprisonment.

The Blackwater boys wear no country's uniform, are not subject to the
criminal laws of either Iraq or the United States in performance of
their "guard duty" over there, and are working as mercenaries for high
pay. They are not *serving* anything but their wallets. *They kill and
maim over there with impunity and face no criminal justice system for
their actions. At some point, the war against Iraq will end and these
Blackwater thugs will come home, and probably look for similar work in
which they can misbehave with impunity.

*If* Americans are going to die in Iraq, *and apparently they are, I'd
rather it be the Blackwater thugs. That way, we'll have fewer of them
back home, and fewer problems.

Returning soldiers, on the other hand, are simply returning soldiers,
and with the proper social services, can be properly integrated back
into normal society.

Is this too abstract for you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, but it's total bull****....

wrote:
On Feb 12, 4:41 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 12, 2:34 pm, camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Feb 12, 7:28 am, HK wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
hell, you might even be able to hit something with it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c&NR=1
--
John H
Finally, the perfect weapon for Blackwater's hired cranks. It will widen the
pattern of their mistakes, and eliminate pesky witnesses.
You know, at some point the Blackwater thugs are going to come home from
Iraq and look for the same sorts of high-pay guard jobs here that they
had there. Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a
public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd
take out the Blackwaters.
Killing Americans is OK with you?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
No, he just says stuff like that to **** folks off..
No, bird brains, I don't.

Let's put it this way: U.S. troops wear this country's uniform, are
subject to at least a modest code of justice regarding their behavior in
places like Iraq, and are *serving their country* for modest pay. If
they screw up badly enough in Iraq in certain situations (like killing
innocent civilians), they face trials and possible imprisonment.

The Blackwater boys wear no country's uniform, are not subject to the
criminal laws of either Iraq or the United States in performance of
their "guard duty" over there, and are working as mercenaries for high
pay. They are not *serving* anything but their wallets. They kill and
maim over there with impunity and face no criminal justice system for
their actions. At some point, the war against Iraq will end and these
Blackwater thugs will come home, and probably look for similar work in
which they can misbehave with impunity.

*If* Americans are going to die in Iraq, and apparently they are, I'd
rather it be the Blackwater thugs. That way, we'll have fewer of them
back home, and fewer problems.

Returning soldiers, on the other hand, are simply returning soldiers,
and with the proper social services, can be properly integrated back
into normal society.

Is this too abstract for you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, but it's total bull****....

What is, that the Blackwater guys were not subject to punishment for
their crimes?

JimH wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Feb 12, 2:34 pm, camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Feb 12, 7:28 am, HK wrote:





JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
hell, you might even be able to hit something with it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c&NR=1
--
John H
Finally, the perfect weapon for Blackwater's hired cranks. It will
widen the
pattern of their mistakes, and eliminate pesky witnesses.
You know, at some point the Blackwater thugs are going to come home
from
Iraq and look for the same sorts of high-pay guard jobs here that they
had there. Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a
public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd
take out the Blackwaters.
Killing Americans is OK with you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
No, he just says stuff like that to **** folks off..

No, bird brains, I don't.

Let's put it this way: U.S. troops wear this country's uniform, are
subject to at least a modest code of justice regarding their behavior in
places like Iraq, and are *serving their country* for modest pay. If they
screw up badly enough in Iraq in certain situations (like killing innocent
civilians), they face trials and possible imprisonment.

The Blackwater boys wear no country's uniform, are not subject to the
criminal laws of either Iraq or the United States in performance of their
"guard duty" over there, and are working as mercenaries for high pay. They
are not *serving* anything but their wallets. They kill and maim over
there with impunity and face no criminal justice system for their actions.
snip



Even if those statements were true, how are they different from terrorist we
are fighting. Eh?


*If* Americans are going to die in Iraq, and apparently they are, I'd
rather it be the Blackwater thugs. That way, we'll have fewer of them back
home, and fewer problems.

Returning soldiers, on the other hand, are simply returning soldiers, and
with the proper social services, can be properly integrated back into
normal society.

Is this too abstract for you?




Some pretty sick comments Harry.



Since I am not in charge of who dies in Iraq, it really doesn't matter.
But my point stands: the returning soldiers are easily integrated back
into society. Mercenaries are not.

On Feb 12, 4:59*pm, HK wrote:
JimH wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Feb 12, 2:34 pm, camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Feb 12, 7:28 am, HK wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
news:haq1r3ttmkqf1dp5cnicr8tcc5pfvlamno@4ax. com...
hell, you might even be able to hit something with it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c&NR=1
--
John H
Finally, the perfect weapon for Blackwater's hired cranks. It will
widen the
pattern of their mistakes, and eliminate pesky witnesses.
You know, at some point the Blackwater thugs are going to come home
from
Iraq and look for the same sorts of high-pay guard jobs here that they
had there. Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a
public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd
take out the Blackwaters.
Killing Americans is OK with you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
No, he just says stuff like that to **** folks off..

No, bird brains, I don't.

Let's put it this way: U.S. troops wear this country's uniform, are
subject to at least a modest code of justice regarding their behavior in
places like Iraq, and are *serving their country* for modest pay. If they
screw up badly enough in Iraq in certain situations (like killing innocent
civilians), they face trials and possible imprisonment.

The Blackwater boys wear no country's uniform, are not subject to the
criminal laws of either Iraq or the United States in performance of their
"guard duty" over there, and are working as mercenaries for high pay. They
are not *serving* anything but their wallets. *They kill and maim over
there with impunity and face no criminal justice system for their actions.
snip

Even if those statements were true, how are they different from terrorist we
are fighting. *Eh?

*If* Americans are going to die in Iraq, *and apparently they are, I'd
rather it be the Blackwater thugs. That way, we'll have fewer of them back
home, and fewer problems.

Returning soldiers, on the other hand, are simply returning soldiers, and
with the proper social services, can be properly integrated back into
normal society.

Is this too abstract for you?

Some pretty sick comments Harry.

Since I am not in charge of who dies in Iraq, it really doesn't matter.
But my point stands: the returning soldiers are easily integrated back
into society. Mercenaries are not.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

How do you know this, just cause you wish it??

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:12:38 -0500, "D.Duck" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:43:45 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
On Feb 12, 7:28 am, HK wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
.. .
hell, you might even be able to hit something with it!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c&NR=1
--
John H

Finally, the perfect weapon for Blackwater's hired cranks. It will
widen
the
pattern of their mistakes, and eliminate pesky witnesses.

You know, at some point the Blackwater thugs are going to come home from
Iraq and look for the same sorts of high-pay guard jobs here that they
had there. Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a
public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd
take out the Blackwaters.

Killing Americans is OK with you?

=========================


You never saw Harry say that, or even remotely imply such a thing. If you
disagree, be a linguist and a scholar for a minute and point out which
specific words or sentences contain the meaning you imagined.


Perhaps the Iraqi "insurgents" would be doing the world a
public service if, instead of targeting uniformed U.S. soldiers, they'd
take out the Blackwaters.

...When did you lose the ability to read and comprehend? Of course, to you
and the 'in crowd' these kinds of comments are 'cool'.
--
John H

"take out", as in out for dinner? :-)


Ah, my mistake. That *must* be what he meant.
--
John H