Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:23:55 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote: On Feb 10, 12:06?pm, John H. The basis for even considering education in the discussion was a claim that D's oppose "No Child Left Behind", and thaty they do so because if the amount of education were increased across the country the number of people supporting the D's would decrease. Which, by the way, was a valid claim. -- Then according to your theory, the states with the greatest numbers of Republicans will be those states with the most successful and comprehensive educational systems. By the same token, the states with the smallest number of Republicans will be those states where the Democrats have succeeded on destroying the education system and thereby protecting their base. Care to offer some examples? Half a dozen or so of each would be sufficient to establish a trend, rather than an exception. Education isn't a statewide function anywhere that I know of. It's a county or city function normally. How do Los Angeles, New York City, and Washington DC do for areas where the base is protected? -- John H |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Winners and Losers | ASA | |||
Liberals are *LOSERS* | General | |||
HEY LOSERS | General | |||
A lot of losers | General | |||
Get Ready, Losers! | ASA |