On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 22:08:11 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:

Some snippage


- Show quoted text -

I didn't say it was bad to be wealthy, I said your party steals for
the wealthy----- vs the other party that steals for the poor. There's
no difference in what either of you do, only who your masters are.

"...steals for the poor." ?What horse****!

DC has a pot full of poor. It's been run by Democrats from time immemorial.
Wealthy Democrats. Democrats who've convinced the 'poor' that they will
look out for the 'poor'. Have the 'poor' done one iota better in all that
time? The Mayors go to jail, the city council folks go to jail, the school
board folks go to jail, the friggin' teachers' union folks go to jail.

You need to wake up Chuck. The Democrats have done a good job of convincing
the uneducated that the Democrats are looking out for them. It's true. The
Democrats want to keep them poor and uneducated - that way the poor will
continue to believe the **** like you just spouted above.

Hell no, the Democrats don't want the No Child Left Behind Act to succeed.
The poor may *learn* something!
--
John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Stop and think, John. (vs react)

Never did I say the Democrats *gave* anything to the poor, just that
Democrats steal from the general public in the name of the poor.
Your party steals from the general public in the name of the rich.
Once again, there is no difference in what either of your parties do-
only in the reasons you give for doing them.

I read. You said, "...the other party that steals *for* (emphasis added)
the poor." Perhaps that slip was Freudian?

I still find your opinion to be horse****. But, that's just my opinion of
your opinion!
--
John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Interesting note: I don't see any denial that your party steals for
(or in the name of) the rich, only a protest that the Democrats don't
really steal for (or in the name of) the poor.

We ran into one of my wife's oldest (longest standing) friends at a
play tonight. This lady organizes the D caucus in her precinct. Four
years ago she had about 20 people attending. This year she had to cram
over 80 people into her house, yard, and garage. Her precint gets 5
delegates to the state D convention, and the crowd elected 4 Obama and
1 Clinton delegate.

Somethin's happenin' here
What it is ain't exactly clear
But it's time to stop, "Hey! What's the sound?"
Everybody look what's goin down.......

I hope that the next POTUS (from either the tweedle-dee or the tweedle-
dum party) does a better job of reaching across the aisle. It's time
for people to stop reacting on an emotional level to the mere mention
of the name of the opposing political party. That's not how adults
solve problems.

No, I didn't address your assertion that my party 'steals for the wealthy'.
It made little sense, and was therefore not addressed.

Now that we've decided the Democrats 'steal *from* the poor' (but pretend
otherwise), perhaps you'd explain your second assertion.

In my view, the Democrats *and* the Republicans steal for the wealthy.
You'd surely put Ted Kennedy, George Soros, Harry Ried, etc. amongst the
wealthy, yes?
--
John H