HK wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in
message . ..

There is no need to speculate over how many might be dead if Saddam
were still in power. What's the point of that? The point is, Bush's
actions resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of thousands of
Iraqis, and for what? For Bush's personal political reasons.

Harry,
Instead of saying "...resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of
thousands of Iraqis" it would be just as accurate to say ...
"resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of millions of Iraqis".
The way you worded that sentence it doesn't matter what number you
use, it is still a true statement.



Who cares, as long as we're bringing democracy to the Middle East, right?

"Consultative Council or Majlis al-Shura (150 members and a chairman
appointed by the monarch for four-year terms); note - though the
Council of Ministers announced in October 2003 its intent to introduce
elections for half of the members of local and provincial assemblies
and a third of the members of the national Consultative Council or
Majlis al-Shura, incrementally over a period of four to five years, to
date no such elections have been held or announced."

Maybe the country described above should be our next stop.



I wonder why ReggieTurd keeps addressing questions or making suggestions
to me?

What an ass.

Harry,
I find it easier to address my comments directly to you, instead of
pretending to have you filtered, and then making snide personal insults.
I love to make a comment and then wait to see how you handle it when
no one quotes my comment in a response. You still responding to my
post, sometimes by starting a new post that address the issue I raised.
No one really believes you use a filter anymore than you own a lobster
boat or are married to a Dr. Dr., so why bother.