"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com...
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
newso6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com...
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave
weapons
to
the
Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when
viewed
in
the context of history, which our current president seems to
know
nothing
about.


Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning
quarterbacking
of
history. You have to remember that previous policies and
actions
were
based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign
relationships don't change overnight.

Eisboch



Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling
more
weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and
****ed
off
as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family.


If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the
Democrat
controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do.
--
John H


Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at
their
corporate contributors.


"The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount
to
$20
billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a
pretty
big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen
Hadley
told
reporters on Air Force One." http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn

Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or
the
Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons
building
jobs.


Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know
is
our
primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep,
John.


Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the
Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped?
--
John H

Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place
their country under totally new management, permanently, including their
oil
wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television.


With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the
sand there?
--
John H


I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than
you
do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john?


Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the
problem?

Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your
comments approach the high side of stupid.
--
John H


The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.