| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#71
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 17, 8:54*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news  o6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com...On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. * You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. *On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... |
|
#72
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
wrote in message
... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news o6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com...On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember? |
|
#73
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 17, 9:08*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news o6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com...On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... |
|
#74
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
wrote in message
... On Jan 17, 9:08 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news o6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com...On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... ======================== Please list the last 5 books you read about our efforts and activities in the Middle East in the period from 1970 to the present. Author and title. |
|
#75
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Jan 17, 9:19*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 9:08 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news o6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com...On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television.. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... ======================== Please list the last 5 books you read about our efforts and activities in the Middle East in the period from 1970 to the present. Author and title.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure, as soon as you answer my questions.. |
|
#76
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
wrote in message
... On Jan 17, 9:19 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 9:08 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news o6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com...On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... ======================== Please list the last 5 books you read about our efforts and activities in the Middle East in the period from 1970 to the present. Author and title.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure, as soon as you answer my questions.. ========================= You want me to explain why we should not sell weapons to our enemies? I will answer the question for you, but first, I need to know what sort of historical foundation of learning you already have. That will determine how I answer the question. So, which books? And, each week, what news sources do you pay very close attention to? Name them all. |
|
#77
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:54:09 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax .com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news o6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4 ax.com...On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@g iganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One." http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period. They're our allies. You've gone through about three different arguments today, making yourself look the fool. Maybe you should just stop. -- John H |
|
#78
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:19:15 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 9:08 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 17, 8:54 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news o6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com...On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message . .. We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave weapons to the Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when viewed in the context of history, which our current president seems to know nothing about. Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking of history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions were based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign relationships don't change overnight. Eisboch Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling more weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and ****ed off as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family. If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the Democrat controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do. -- John H Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at their corporate contributors. "The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to $20 billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a pretty big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley told reporters on Air Force One."http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons building jobs. Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is our primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John. Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped? -- John H Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place their country under totally new management, permanently, including their oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television. With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the sand there? -- John H I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john? Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the problem? Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your comments approach the high side of stupid. -- John H The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Since when you stupid drunk, please explain why we don't do buisness with enemies. While you are at it please tell me the last country we invaded that we did not rebuild and return to them?? We have been over this befoe, there is no reason to suggest we went anywhere for oil, especially since we are taking none... ========================== Recently, you said you were a simple person. Remember?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So as ALWAYS you really have no answer, just here being contrarian for some kind of sick entertainment.. As simple as I am, I have seen a lot and lived even more, you are not hard to pin down. You have no answers, only games, dismissed... ======================== Please list the last 5 books you read about our efforts and activities in the Middle East in the period from 1970 to the present. Author and title. Change the subject. Another loss. You're batting 1000. -- John H |
|
#79
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
|
|
#80
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bad News for the GOP: Inflation Rate Worst in *17* Years
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| OT--Wal-Mart economy keeps lid on US inflation | General | |||
| OT Repub voodoo econmics = inflation | General | |||
| Maryland tops Texas in violent crime rate, has nation's 3rd highest murder rate | General | |||
| Prez Helps Stop Inflation! | General | |||
Linear Mode
