JimH wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:32:42 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:

To participate here you need to be unbalanced.
Heh.

The basic problem on this group is too many northern boaters with
nothing to do for 6 months of the year (with apologies to those doing
January sea trials in New England).

Posted at anchor near Big Pine Key, FL

So it looks like you are getting as far away from home on this trip as you
did on the previous trip up north (Spring to Fall).

Why the need to get out of Dodge just after getting home? ;-)







Threats from neighbors.

On Jan 16, 5:32*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message

...



Chuck, just be fair and balanced. That's all.
--
John H

To participate here you need to be unbalanced.

Eisboch

Mentally.

On Jan 16, 5:49*pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

A sword on his shoulder??? *Oh no....a re-run of the flight suit on the
aircraft carrier pose.
He was marching with the slimey Saudis in some sort of procession. You
think maybe he was being inducted into the local masonic lodge?

He was doing nothing more than following the protocol and tradition of the
country he was visiting and in accordance with the cultural advisors that
tell him what to do.

Any POTUS would be doing the same thing.

You guys are too much sometimes.

Eisboch

Sorry, but I cannot envision President Hillary walking hand in hand with
the slimey Saudis and carrying a sword on her soldier. Or President
Barack. The fact is, Bush is a toady of the Saudis.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No she'd have to have her face hidden

On Jan 16, 5:49*pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

A sword on his shoulder??? *Oh no....a re-run of the flight suit on the
aircraft carrier pose.
He was marching with the slimey Saudis in some sort of procession. You
think maybe he was being inducted into the local masonic lodge?

He was doing nothing more than following the protocol and tradition of the
country he was visiting and in accordance with the cultural advisors that
tell him what to do.

Any POTUS would be doing the same thing.

You guys are too much sometimes.

Eisboch

Sorry, but I cannot envision President Hillary walking hand in hand with
the slimey Saudis and carrying a sword on her soldier. Or President
Barack. The fact is, Bush is a toady of the Saudis.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Was Bubba a "toady" of Israel when he showed up there wearing a Jewish
kippah or yarmulke on his head? After all he claims to be a Southern
Baptist.

http://blog.balder.org/billeder-blog...raeli-Flag.jpg

I agree with Richard.

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

"John H." wrote in message
Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place
their country under totally new management, permanently, including their
oil wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television.


A re-run of Iraq, huh?

Eisboch


Actually, I said that. I suggested turning Saudi Arabia into Puerto Rico. We
built the country with our money. It's ours. Incinerate every living
resident of the country. On television. Line the borders 10 miles deep with
land mines every 36 inches. Take their oil

Capisce?

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
newso6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4ax. com...
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@giga news.com...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave
weapons
to
the
Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when
viewed
in
the context of history, which our current president seems to know
nothing
about.


Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking
of
history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions
were
based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign
relationships don't change overnight.

Eisboch



Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling
more
weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and
****ed
off
as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family.


If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the
Democrat
controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do.
--
John H


Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at
their
corporate contributors.


"The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to
$20
billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a
pretty
big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley
told
reporters on Air Force One." http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn

Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the
Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons
building
jobs.


Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is
our
primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John.


Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the
Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped?
--
John H

Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place
their country under totally new management, permanently, including their
oil
wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television.


With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the
sand there?
--
John H


I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you
do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john?

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...


Not to worry. Next January, the Democrats will control the White House
and increase their simple majorities in Congress.

Unless your write-in campaign for Zell Miller or some other lunatic
succeeds.

What economic policies there are in place now are those of the Bush
Administration.

Bad news for the GOP. So sad.



They control congress. They have a majority.

They "can". But they don't.

Eisboch


That is very true. May be why Congress has a lower approval rating than the
POTUS.

On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:01:52 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Jan 16, 5:49*pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

A sword on his shoulder??? *Oh no....a re-run of the flight suit on the
aircraft carrier pose.
He was marching with the slimey Saudis in some sort of procession. You
think maybe he was being inducted into the local masonic lodge?

He was doing nothing more than following the protocol and tradition of the
country he was visiting and in accordance with the cultural advisors that
tell him what to do.

Any POTUS would be doing the same thing.

You guys are too much sometimes.

Eisboch

Sorry, but I cannot envision President Hillary walking hand in hand with
the slimey Saudis and carrying a sword on her soldier. Or President
Barack. The fact is, Bush is a toady of the Saudis.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Was Bubba a "toady" of Israel when he showed up there wearing a Jewish
kippah or yarmulke on his head? After all he claims to be a Southern
Baptist.

http://blog.balder.org/billeder-blog...raeli-Flag.jpg

I agree with Richard.

Well, that's good and all, but the bozo's bin is getting crowded!
--
John H

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
newso6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4ax .com...
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gig anews.com...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave
weapons
to
the
Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when
viewed
in
the context of history, which our current president seems to know
nothing
about.


Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning quarterbacking
of
history. You have to remember that previous policies and actions
were
based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign
relationships don't change overnight.

Eisboch



Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling
more
weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and
****ed
off
as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family.


If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the
Democrat
controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do.
--
John H


Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at
their
corporate contributors.


"The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount to
$20
billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a
pretty
big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen Hadley
told
reporters on Air Force One." http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn

Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the
Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons
building
jobs.


Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know is
our
primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep, John.


Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the
Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped?
--
John H

Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place
their country under totally new management, permanently, including their
oil
wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television.


With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the
sand there?
--
John H


I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than you
do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john?


Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the
problem?

Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your
comments approach the high side of stupid.
--
John H

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:57:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:0h7to3ht5c49u3qgsaa8ugos1rj6ku1nbn@4ax. com...
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:08:49 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
newso6to31450ds2hsncv0k7cq4oaoaroeh7e@4a x.com...
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:36:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
news:6tSdnbkgeP4fDhPanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@gi ganews.com...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

We once sold weapons to Iran to help "protect" us. We gave
weapons
to
the
Taliban. We sell weapons to Pakistan. It's all very stupid when
viewed
in
the context of history, which our current president seems to
know
nothing
about.


Lots of things seem "stupid" in the Monday morning
quarterbacking
of
history. You have to remember that previous policies and
actions
were
based on the conditions at that time and the inertia of foreign
relationships don't change overnight.

Eisboch



Right now is not Monday morning. Conditions do not warrant selling
more
weapons to Saudi Arabia, many of whose citizens are as crazy and
****ed
off
as OBL, and are just aching for a shot at the royal family.


If I'm not mistaken, Congress has to approve the sale. Surely the
Democrat
controlled Congress will have the same smarts you do.
--
John H


Apparently, they don't. It would be interesting to take a look at
their
corporate contributors.


"The arms sale, which Congress has 30 days to review, would amount
to
$20
billion worth of weapons, including precision-guided bombs. It is "a
pretty
big package, lots of pieces," national security adviser Stephen
Hadley
told
reporters on Air Force One." http://tinyurl.com/2gjepn

Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or
the
Chinese? Then you'd be bitching about outsourcing more weapons
building
jobs.


Loss of jobs does not justify selling weapons to the country we know
is
our
primary enemy in the war on Islamic terrorists. Go back to sleep,
John.


Would it be better if they bought the weapons from the Russians or the
Chinese? Are you too much a pansy to answer the question you skipped?
--
John H

Yes, it would be better. Then, we would have yet another reason to place
their country under totally new management, permanently, including their
oil
wells, and execute every member of the royal family. On television.


With the Russians or Chinese backing them? Did you put your head in the
sand there?
--
John H


I wasn't in the military and I have more confidence in our military than
you
do. Did you penis fall off earlier this evening, little john?


Our military take on their military? Is a nuclear war your answer to the
problem?

Your personal attacks aren't becoming, but they're the norm when your
comments approach the high side of stupid.
--
John H


The bottom line is that you don't sell weapons to enemies. Period.