Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 16, 9:17 pm, "Jim" wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "Jim" wrote in message .. . The definition of peak to peak must have changed since I was in A school. I was taught that positive peak to negative peak or negative peak to positive peak shal be called peak to peak. (Neener Neener) Sure. I don't disagree. Usually the term "peak to peak" relates to amplitude measurements. But, a positive peak to the next negative peak is 180 degrees if you are looking for frequency over a time period. A positive peak to the next positive peak is 360 degrees. Or negative to the next negative. Or any other point to the next repeating point on the waveform. Eisboch 360 degrees= 1 cycle is the description I was looking for. Quit trying to confuse me with facts. Check tonights Tampa news videos. OK, for radio waves, there are several straightforward ways to directly measure wavelength instead of calculating it from frequency. The easiest is with a waveguide with a variable end. This is simply a metal tube whose diameter is roughly the wavelength. You adjust the length of the tube (it should have a sliding metal end) till a electric field prob in the center measures a maximum indicating that your wave terminates at the end. Then you move he slide in and you will find another position where you have a maximum. The distance you have moved the slide is the wavelngth. The electrical engineers here can tell you how this relates to SWR etc and all about Smith Charts but this is a very straightforward physical measurement. You can also use two vertical antennas each emitting a sin wave of exactly identical in phase signal. When the two antennas are exactly one half wavelength apart, you will see a maximum signal along a line that passes exactly betwen the two antennas. For visible light, one uses a device called an interferometer to directly measure the wavelngth. Because such devices are so sensitive to movement, they are often used to align extremely precise equipment. For x-rays, one uses crystals where the wavlength is given by wavelength=2dsin(q) where 2d is the crystal spacing and q is the reflection angle (I do this every day) For sound waves, I would use a tube with a variable slider so the tube would resonate with teh applied sound when the slider is set to the correct length corresponding to the wavelngth. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Portable "MARINE" TV with Built-In AM/FM Radio in Ontario | Marketplace | |||
Another "sound" recommendation | General | |||
How long is a "fid length" | Cruising | |||
UK Based Radio Amateurs & "Boating types" | Electronics |