On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:21:18 -0500, HK wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 13:05:05 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 07:28:22 -0500, John H.
wrote:


You mean the 'comparably equipped' didn't run you $8-10K more for the
Toyota?
What part about rebates and dropping price because they had too many
trucks on the lot didn't you understand?

Didn't we go through that little discussion here a week or so ago?
Yes we did and based on sticker on comparable 1/2 ton pickups, my
statement stands on it's own.
Tom, if you'd waited and looked at any of the American trucks, you'd have
eventually found the same discounts because of too many on the lot, etc.


The price doesn't matter if he doesn't like the products. Do you need an
overhead projector and transparencies to understand this?




A tip of the hat to you, "Joe." You have much more tolerance for reading
the sort of nonsense Herring posts than I do.

I owned a "modern" F150 for a couple of years, and found it to be a
decent truck. I traded it on on a Toyota Tundra and found the latter to
be far superior in every way, including quality of parts, fit, finish,
"ride," handling and much more. I've been toying with the idea of
trading in my 4Runner soon, and a new Tundra is on the short list.

Yeah, Joe. When I posted good comments about Tundras, they were nonsense.
Now Harry is considering one. So there.

Apparently both you guys missed the relevant discussion.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."