Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
OT I am ashamed
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
OT I am ashamed
Jim wrote:
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Con...=1038394944443 It's just the latest of the Bush scams to manipulate public opinion. Hide the bodies; there are no war casualties. -- Email sent to will never reach me. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
OT I am ashamed
"Jim" wrote in message
... http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Con...=1038394944443 This is so disappointing considering we ask our men and women in the military to risk their lives, their limbs and their mental health fighting on behalf of our country. To go to war under false pretenses is one thing, to treat the men and women who were wounded or killed with anything less than the dignity and attention due a person in such circumstances is a travesty. The American people have a responsibility to support these people whether it be monitarily, emotionally or spiritually. They and their loved ones have paid a huge price. To sweep their tragic circumstances under the carpet is inhumane and sickening. Shame on us. jps |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
OT I am ashamed
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jim wrote: http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Con...=1038394944443 It's just the latest of the Bush scams to manipulate public opinion. Hide the bodies; there are no war casualties. What about the fact that this is the continuation of a 12 year old policy? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
OT I am ashamed
What about the fact that this is the continuation of a 12 year old policy?
??????? Clinton used to publicly meet planes carrying bodies from Kosovo. So how is forbidding any coverage of the saddest possible consequences a continuation of a 12-year-old policy? Is it a 12-year-old policy with 8 years off when there wasn't a Bush in the WH? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
OT I am ashamed
Jim wrote:
http://www1.iraqwar.ru/iraq-read_art...=25162&lang=en We should all be very ashamed. Rick |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
OT I am ashamed
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 19:56:19 -0500, Jim wrote:
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Con...=1038394944443 If the televising of caskets is so important, and if the families of the deceased servicemen/women need public exposure for some type of 'closure', then why are all the funerals not televised? Nothing is prohibiting the networks from televising funerals, if the families so desire. And if the families don't desire the public viewing of the caskets, then the media should not be entitled to air the scenes. Much ado about nothing. John On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
OT I am ashamed
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 21:44:57 -0800, "jps" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Con...=1038394944443 This is so disappointing considering we ask our men and women in the military to risk their lives, their limbs and their mental health fighting on behalf of our country. To go to war under false pretenses is one thing, to treat the men and women who were wounded or killed with anything less than the dignity and attention due a person in such circumstances is a travesty. The American people have a responsibility to support these people whether it be monitarily, emotionally or spiritually. They and their loved ones have paid a huge price. To sweep their tragic circumstances under the carpet is inhumane and sickening. Shame on us. jps Preventing the public display for propaganda purposes of the liberals IS treating the deceased with dignity and deserved attention. If the media 'papparazzi' (sp) need pictures of caskets, they should get permission from the next of kin to videotape the funeral. Much ado about nothing. John On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
OT I am ashamed
JohnH wrote:
Much ado about nothing. So JohnH, I assume (from something in one of your post a while back) that you were in the military. You think it's great to have a CinC who turns his back on military casualties? DSK |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
OT I am ashamed
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:54:07 -0500, DSK wrote:
JohnH wrote: Much ado about nothing. So JohnH, I assume (from something in one of your post a while back) that you were in the military. You think it's great to have a CinC who turns his back on military casualties? DSK Yes, I was. The President is not "turning his back on military casualties". This is a great example of tripe developed by libs. No one could reasonably expect the President to welcome every plane that arrives at Dover carrying wounded or deceased military. He does have a few other things to do. John On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|