Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 25, 1:14�pm, Roger Pearse wrote:
On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible. Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in the Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered holy and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correct one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". �Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. I first graduated from a college affiliated with a particular Christian denomination. We were required to study religion and I found studying both sides of a central point in time established by the Councils ofNiceato be an amazing trip. This led me to the conclusion that anybody that feels that they are Christian should do at least two things: 1) Read the Bible.... ALL OF IT..... and 2) Study the history of the creation of Christianity.... Agree or disagree with what you like..... but you owe it to yourself to be an informed consumer.... So why didn't you learn about the subject before you posted such arrant tripe? All the best, Roger Pearse While the council didn't specifically canonize the modern Bible, Constantine did order at essentially that same time 50 copies of the "approved" religious texts for use in the churches of Constantinople. Modern scholars disagree whether those approved scriptures included nearly all of the current "New Testament" or merely Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John- but there is no thought that any books not included in a modern Bible were made available to the churches in Constantinople. The council at Nicea did order the burning of books representing minority viewpoints regarding whether God was of a triune nature, etc. At least one major priest was kicked out of the church for "wrong thinking". Nevertheless, as Gene said by the end of the 4th Century the Church had convened a series of committe meetings to discuss and debate which books should be included in the official Bible, and things decided then are still in effect today. In addition to Nicea,there were councils convened at Laodicea and Carthage that addressed canonization. A number of false assumptions prevailed at these councils, including the common belief that books we now know did not exist prior to 150-180 AD were "apostolic" writings, (authored by men who had traveled with Jesus). If the books were written by the original disciplies (many of whom were probably illiterate), the disciples would certainly have lived to a very ripe old age. Interesting note: Harry Potter novels and works by Stephen King notwithstanding, the Bible is the world's best selling book year after year. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why is there Religious Junk on a Toyota Newsgroup ?? | General | |||
Why is there Religious Junk on a Toyota Newsgroup ?? | General | |||
(OT) "We are in a religious war" | General |