Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:45:12 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:55:49 -0500, HK wrote: Sorry to interrupt the usual drivel in here, but I did want to report good customer service from Raymarine. I have a Ray fishfinder/depthfinder on son of Yo Ho. I didn't think the display was bright enough, so last September I called and asked what to do. I was told to simply return the unit after the boating season and Ray's service department would look it over. Sent the unit back last week, got a phone call Wednesday, told there was nothing out of the ordinary, but the company was sending a brand new unit just to make sure. It arrived yesterday. Cool. Oh...side benefit...everyone I spoke with at Ray spoke English properly, with a solid Yankee accent! ================================================= == That's good to know but I can tell you from personal experience that if you had bought a Furuno, the display would have been bright enough right out of the box. I have to turn ours way down at night to keep from being blinded by it. It is highly visible in direct sunlight on the flybridge and that was a deciding factor in buying it. If you take a look around at what commercial fisherman are using, well over 90% are Furuno. When I bought my first Contender, I looked at both systems and didn't see a lot of difference - both quality small boat systems. I went with Raymarine only because I have a family connection to Raytheon and up to that point, always used Raytheon marine equipment. And I will admit to being a "brand" loyal type of person - with two exceptions, I've always bought Ford vehicles. Not a knock on Furuno, but I think a lot is market penetration - used to be DECCA 202s that were popular small marine radars. I look at Furuno kinda like Yamaha - they are ok engines, but monkey see, monkey do. :) Wow - that DECCA thing goes back a few years. ~~ sheesh ~~ |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:45:12 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:55:49 -0500, HK wrote: Sorry to interrupt the usual drivel in here, but I did want to report good customer service from Raymarine. I have a Ray fishfinder/depthfinder on son of Yo Ho. I didn't think the display was bright enough, so last September I called and asked what to do. I was told to simply return the unit after the boating season and Ray's service department would look it over. Sent the unit back last week, got a phone call Wednesday, told there was nothing out of the ordinary, but the company was sending a brand new unit just to make sure. It arrived yesterday. Cool. Oh...side benefit...everyone I spoke with at Ray spoke English properly, with a solid Yankee accent! ================================================== = That's good to know but I can tell you from personal experience that if you had bought a Furuno, the display would have been bright enough right out of the box. I have to turn ours way down at night to keep from being blinded by it. It is highly visible in direct sunlight on the flybridge and that was a deciding factor in buying it. If you take a look around at what commercial fisherman are using, well over 90% are Furuno. When I bought my first Contender, I looked at both systems and didn't see a lot of difference - both quality small boat systems. I went with Raymarine only because I have a family connection to Raytheon and up to that point, always used Raytheon marine equipment. And I will admit to being a "brand" loyal type of person - with two exceptions, I've always bought Ford vehicles. Not a knock on Furuno, but I think a lot is market penetration - used to be DECCA 202s that were popular small marine radars. I look at Furuno kinda like Yamaha - they are ok engines, but monkey see, monkey do. :) Wow - that DECCA thing goes back a few years. ~~ sheesh ~~ The first Furuno fishfinder mounted on the original Yo Ho died during the first season and it took Furuno a full month to replace it. I also had to replace the Furuno-branded transducer once. Both units were properly installed. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:45:34 -0500, HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:45:12 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:55:49 -0500, HK wrote: Sorry to interrupt the usual drivel in here, but I did want to report good customer service from Raymarine. I have a Ray fishfinder/depthfinder on son of Yo Ho. I didn't think the display was bright enough, so last September I called and asked what to do. I was told to simply return the unit after the boating season and Ray's service department would look it over. Sent the unit back last week, got a phone call Wednesday, told there was nothing out of the ordinary, but the company was sending a brand new unit just to make sure. It arrived yesterday. Cool. Oh...side benefit...everyone I spoke with at Ray spoke English properly, with a solid Yankee accent! ================================================== = That's good to know but I can tell you from personal experience that if you had bought a Furuno, the display would have been bright enough right out of the box. I have to turn ours way down at night to keep from being blinded by it. It is highly visible in direct sunlight on the flybridge and that was a deciding factor in buying it. If you take a look around at what commercial fisherman are using, well over 90% are Furuno. When I bought my first Contender, I looked at both systems and didn't see a lot of difference - both quality small boat systems. I went with Raymarine only because I have a family connection to Raytheon and up to that point, always used Raytheon marine equipment. And I will admit to being a "brand" loyal type of person - with two exceptions, I've always bought Ford vehicles. Not a knock on Furuno, but I think a lot is market penetration - used to be DECCA 202s that were popular small marine radars. I look at Furuno kinda like Yamaha - they are ok engines, but monkey see, monkey do. :) Wow - that DECCA thing goes back a few years. ~~ sheesh ~~ The first Furuno fishfinder mounted on the original Yo Ho died during the first season and it took Furuno a full month to replace it. I also had to replace the Furuno-branded transducer once. Both units were properly installed. Counter point - I've never owned a Garmin unit that worked properly first time out of the box and, in my experience, their customer service leaves a lot to be desired. Yet a lot of people have nothing but good things to say about them. So - who knows. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:25:04 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:45:34 -0500, HK wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:45:12 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:55:49 -0500, HK wrote: Sorry to interrupt the usual drivel in here, but I did want to report good customer service from Raymarine. I have a Ray fishfinder/depthfinder on son of Yo Ho. I didn't think the display was bright enough, so last September I called and asked what to do. I was told to simply return the unit after the boating season and Ray's service department would look it over. Sent the unit back last week, got a phone call Wednesday, told there was nothing out of the ordinary, but the company was sending a brand new unit just to make sure. It arrived yesterday. Cool. Oh...side benefit...everyone I spoke with at Ray spoke English properly, with a solid Yankee accent! ================================================== = That's good to know but I can tell you from personal experience that if you had bought a Furuno, the display would have been bright enough right out of the box. I have to turn ours way down at night to keep from being blinded by it. It is highly visible in direct sunlight on the flybridge and that was a deciding factor in buying it. If you take a look around at what commercial fisherman are using, well over 90% are Furuno. When I bought my first Contender, I looked at both systems and didn't see a lot of difference - both quality small boat systems. I went with Raymarine only because I have a family connection to Raytheon and up to that point, always used Raytheon marine equipment. And I will admit to being a "brand" loyal type of person - with two exceptions, I've always bought Ford vehicles. Not a knock on Furuno, but I think a lot is market penetration - used to be DECCA 202s that were popular small marine radars. I look at Furuno kinda like Yamaha - they are ok engines, but monkey see, monkey do. :) Wow - that DECCA thing goes back a few years. ~~ sheesh ~~ The first Furuno fishfinder mounted on the original Yo Ho died during the first season and it took Furuno a full month to replace it. I also had to replace the Furuno-branded transducer once. Both units were properly installed. Counter point - I've never owned a Garmin unit that worked properly first time out of the box and, in my experience, their customer service leaves a lot to be desired. Yet a lot of people have nothing but good things to say about them. So - who knows. da, DA! The Shadow knows.... -- John H |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RayMarine GPS | Electronics | |||
Kudos to Rule-Good cust service | General | |||
Apelco/Raymarine 520 / Raymarine 102 handheld VHF | Electronics |