On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:05:02 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:

On Nov 27, 3:53?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:34:59 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould





wrote:
On Nov 27, 3:02?pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:56:18 GMT, James R. Gallows III
wrote:

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:30:17 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

I would doubt a small town would have any info on a small parade, and I
am sure you are correct, but I am curious, what town is it?

I found it and I'm not telling.

A**hole
--
John H

John, here's another eye witness to the same phenomenon;

a Protestant pastor "writhing and dieing on a cross" in a Christmas
parade in Central FL. ?Either Harry and this nice little old Episcopal
lady are in a conspiracy- or he really saw what he claims to have
seen.

http://1episcopalvoice.blogspot.com/...in-jesus-contr...

Do either you or Kanter actually read the newsgroup?

How many times is this going to be posted?

Jeese...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Actually I try to skip over the "you're a liar," "no I'm not, but
you're an asshole", "oh yeah, well so and so is your puppy dog" etc
etc portions of a thread.

I noticed that the fight still appeared to be going on 100 and some
posts into the thread (didn't read most of them after things devolved
into name callind, etc).

So, sorry. I figured if there was still a lont of angst over whether
the event or similar events had occured the actual fact of the matter
hadn't come to light yet.

Actually, only one name was called, and that was to a fictional character.
No one called anyone a liar.

Actually, there's been very little 'angst'. It's best to know what's under
you when you jump in with both feet.
--
John H

On Nov 27, 4:27�pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:05:02 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould





wrote:
On Nov 27, 3:53?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:34:59 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould

wrote:
On Nov 27, 3:02?pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:56:18 GMT, James R. Gallows III
wrote:

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:30:17 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

I would doubt a small town would have any info on a small parade, and I
am sure you are correct, but I am curious, what town is it?

I found it and I'm not telling.

A**hole
--
John H

John, here's another eye witness to the same phenomenon;

a Protestant pastor "writhing and dieing on a cross" in a Christmas
parade in Central FL. ?Either Harry and this nice little old Episcopal
lady are in a conspiracy- or he really saw what he claims to have
seen.

http://1episcopalvoice.blogspot.com/...in-jesus-contr....

Do either you or Kanter actually read the newsgroup?

How many times is this going to be posted?

Jeese...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Actually I try to skip over the "you're a liar," "no I'm not, but
you're an asshole", "oh yeah, well so and so is your puppy dog" etc
etc portions of a thread.

I noticed that the fight still appeared to be going on 100 and some
posts into the thread (didn't read most of them after things devolved
into name callind, etc).

So, sorry. I figured if there was still a lont of angst over whether
the event or similar events had occured the actual fact of the matter
hadn't come to light yet.

Actually, only one name was called, and that was to a fictional character.
No one called anyone a liar.

Odd; I swear I saw at least a suggestion that that somebody was
"making it up as you go along." But you may be technically correct and
perhaps only the accusation of lying (rather than the official title
"liar") appeared in this thread.




Actually, there's been very little 'angst'. It's best to know what's under
you when you jump in with both feet.


I'm trying to keep my feet, ankles, knees, etc out of it, thanks
anyway.
Tall boots help.

There are a lot of very unpleasant posts in this thread. And no need,
as it turns out that Harry at the very least *could have* seen exactly
what he claims he saw. No reason to believe otherwise.

The disconnect must be that some folks were trying to think of a
traditional religious practice that would involve a live actor posing
on a cross, and outside of some Latin American cultures it's
apparently very rare. However, that doesn't stop some individual
zealot from doing just exactly that, and doing so down in some small
town in Florida




--
John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:01:48 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:

On Nov 27, 4:27?pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:05:02 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould





wrote:
On Nov 27, 3:53?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:34:59 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould

wrote:
On Nov 27, 3:02?pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:56:18 GMT, James R. Gallows III
wrote:

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:30:17 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

I would doubt a small town would have any info on a small parade, and I
am sure you are correct, but I am curious, what town is it?

I found it and I'm not telling.

A**hole
--
John H

John, here's another eye witness to the same phenomenon;

a Protestant pastor "writhing and dieing on a cross" in a Christmas
parade in Central FL. ?Either Harry and this nice little old Episcopal
lady are in a conspiracy- or he really saw what he claims to have
seen.

http://1episcopalvoice.blogspot.com/...in-jesus-contr...

Do either you or Kanter actually read the newsgroup?

How many times is this going to be posted?

Jeese...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Actually I try to skip over the "you're a liar," "no I'm not, but
you're an asshole", "oh yeah, well so and so is your puppy dog" etc
etc portions of a thread.

I noticed that the fight still appeared to be going on 100 and some
posts into the thread (didn't read most of them after things devolved
into name callind, etc).

So, sorry. I figured if there was still a lont of angst over whether
the event or similar events had occured the actual fact of the matter
hadn't come to light yet.

Actually, only one name was called, and that was to a fictional character.
No one called anyone a liar.

Odd; I swear I saw at least a suggestion that that somebody was
"making it up as you go along." But you may be technically correct and
perhaps only the accusation of lying (rather than the official title
"liar") appeared in this thread.




Actually, there's been very little 'angst'. It's best to know what's under
you when you jump in with both feet.


I'm trying to keep my feet, ankles, knees, etc out of it, thanks
anyway.
Tall boots help.

There are a lot of very unpleasant posts in this thread. And no need,
as it turns out that Harry at the very least *could have* seen exactly
what he claims he saw. No reason to believe otherwise.

The disconnect must be that some folks were trying to think of a
traditional religious practice that would involve a live actor posing
on a cross, and outside of some Latin American cultures it's
apparently very rare. However, that doesn't stop some individual
zealot from doing just exactly that, and doing so down in some small
town in Florida




--
John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You read a statement of what I believe. The fact that I don't believe
something doesn't mean it's a lie. I *could* be wrong. You're looking too
hard.

There are a lot of statements made here that have engendered disbelief.
Does it mean the makers of the statement are liars? Hell no. It simply
means someone didn't believe the statement.
--
John H