wrote in message
oups.com...
On Nov 12, 2:34 pm, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:
In messagenews:qo5hj3t2c7bvhid1joj28lvenotn7l2g1e@4ax .com, Gene Kearns
sprach forth the following:





On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:42:28 GMT, BillP penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|
|"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
. ..
| On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:44:15 GMT, BillP penned the following well
| considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
|
| |
| |"Gene Kearns" wrote in
| |
| | Wonderful textbook example of both hasty generalization and false
| | dilemma. Don't they teach logic in schools any more?
| |
| |My statement is logical, sorry if that doesn't fit your religion.
| |
| |Lets make it easy for you- we'll take one at a time.
| |
| |
| |1- Atmospheric CO2 is not the only, not even the primary greenhouse
| |gas. Water Vapor is the major component (95%).
| |
| |Is this a true or false statement ?
| |
|
| Do you accept the entire FAQ document published by NOAA, that
| suggests that CO2 is the second most abundant greenhouse gas, as a
| factual document?
|
|
|Yes I agree that CO2 (approx 3.5% of all greenhouse gases) is the
|second most abundant greenhouse gas behind water vapor, but back to my
|question-
|
|1- Atmospheric CO2 is not the only, not even the primary greenhouse
|gas.
||Water Vapor is the major component (95%).
|
|True or false?
|

Nice try, but either you accept the document as factual or not.

I'm not going to engage is some sort of pointless verbal excursion
with you while you cherry pick passages, from however many documents,
you feel support your pre-defined position.

What a ****ing pussy. With the world's ugliest wife.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


You hide behind usenet calling people names, saying crappy things
about their families, etc, again all the while hiding like a scared
little punk, then have the audacity to call someone else a pussy? Look
in the mirror, lowlife.


What mirror? They're not allowed in his cell.