On Nov 12, 12:42 pm, "BillP" wrote:
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message

...





On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:44:15 GMT, BillP penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|
|"Gene Kearns" wrote in
|
| Wonderful textbook example of both hasty generalization and false
| dilemma. Don't they teach logic in schools any more?
|
|My statement is logical, sorry if that doesn't fit your religion.
|
|Lets make it easy for you- we'll take one at a time.
|
|
|1- Atmospheric CO2 is not the only, not even the primary greenhouse gas.
|Water Vapor is the major component (95%).
|
|Is this a true or false statement ?
|

Do you accept the entire FAQ document published by NOAA, that suggests
that CO2 is the second most abundant greenhouse gas, as a factual
document?

Yes I agree that CO2 (approx 3.5% of all greenhouse gases) is the second
most abundant greenhouse gas behind water vapor, but back to my question-

1- Atmospheric CO2 is not the only, not even the primary greenhouse gas.
|Water Vapor is the major component (95%).

True or false?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You do realize that water vapor has risen rapidly, don't you? Do you
have any idea why?

On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:42:28 GMT, BillP penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|
|"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
.. .
| On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:44:15 GMT, BillP penned the following well
| considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
|
| |
| |"Gene Kearns" wrote in
| |
| | Wonderful textbook example of both hasty generalization and false
| | dilemma. Don't they teach logic in schools any more?
| |
| |My statement is logical, sorry if that doesn't fit your religion.
| |
| |Lets make it easy for you- we'll take one at a time.
| |
| |
| |1- Atmospheric CO2 is not the only, not even the primary greenhouse gas.
| |Water Vapor is the major component (95%).
| |
| |Is this a true or false statement ?
| |
|
| Do you accept the entire FAQ document published by NOAA, that suggests
| that CO2 is the second most abundant greenhouse gas, as a factual
| document?
|
|
|Yes I agree that CO2 (approx 3.5% of all greenhouse gases) is the second
|most abundant greenhouse gas behind water vapor, but back to my question-
|
|1- Atmospheric CO2 is not the only, not even the primary greenhouse gas.
||Water Vapor is the major component (95%).
|
|True or false?
|

Nice try, but either you accept the document as factual or not.

I'm not going to engage is some sort of pointless verbal excursion
with you while you cherry pick passages, from however many documents,
you feel support your pre-defined position.

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/

Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats
-----------------
www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------

wrote
You do realize that water vapor has risen rapidly, don't you? Do you
have any idea why?

Buoyancy. (Duh)

"Gene Kearns"
Nice try, but either you accept the document as factual or not.

I'm not going to engage is some sort of pointless verbal excursion
with you while you cherry pick passages, from however many documents,
you feel support your pre-defined position.


LOL, bye............

wrote in message

You do realize that water vapor has risen rapidly, don't you?

Do you have proof of this?

"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" wrote in message
...

a comment not worthy of repeating.

Welcome to my permanent bozo bin, Fred. You are the first. I hope your
busy hand falls off.

Eisboch

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" wrote in message
...

a comment not worthy of repeating.

Welcome to my permanent bozo bin, Fred. You are the first. I hope your
busy hand falls off.

Eisboch


Heh....my news server didn't show his message, but so what? Was it a string
OF oBScenITiES indicating that he was off his thorazine again?

On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:03:05 -0000, penned the
following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:


|
|You do realize that water vapor has risen rapidly, don't you? Do you
|have any idea why?

Watch out, man, watch out..... when he realizes it is the same
document he wanted to quote with me, but wouldn't accept as fact, he's
probably going to cut and run........

...... and then you'll be piled on by his small town janitor sock
puppet that brags about not being married and still lives with his
mommy in a 700 sq ft house in Podunk, NY! Duck, because he might
actually use the "P" word! He might even make disparaging remarks
about your family!

Ohhhhh.... they're a dangerous pair, they are.....

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/

Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats
-----------------
www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------

On Nov 12, 1:56 pm, "Ernest Scribbler"
wrote:
wrote

You do realize that water vapor has risen rapidly, don't you? Do you
have any idea why?

Buoyancy. (Duh)

I guess that you aren't bright enough or just don't want to think
about things IN CONTEXT, eh?

On Nov 12, 2:34 pm, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:
In messagenews:qo5hj3t2c7bvhid1joj28lvenotn7l2g1e@4ax .com, Gene Kearns
sprach forth the following:





On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:42:28 GMT, BillP penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|
|"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
. ..
| On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:44:15 GMT, BillP penned the following well
| considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
|
| |
| |"Gene Kearns" wrote in
| |
| | Wonderful textbook example of both hasty generalization and false
| | dilemma. Don't they teach logic in schools any more?
| |
| |My statement is logical, sorry if that doesn't fit your religion.
| |
| |Lets make it easy for you- we'll take one at a time.
| |
| |
| |1- Atmospheric CO2 is not the only, not even the primary greenhouse
| |gas. Water Vapor is the major component (95%).
| |
| |Is this a true or false statement ?
| |
|
| Do you accept the entire FAQ document published by NOAA, that
| suggests that CO2 is the second most abundant greenhouse gas, as a
| factual document?
|
|
|Yes I agree that CO2 (approx 3.5% of all greenhouse gases) is the
|second most abundant greenhouse gas behind water vapor, but back to my
|question-
|
|1- Atmospheric CO2 is not the only, not even the primary greenhouse
|gas.
||Water Vapor is the major component (95%).
|
|True or false?
|

Nice try, but either you accept the document as factual or not.

I'm not going to engage is some sort of pointless verbal excursion
with you while you cherry pick passages, from however many documents,
you feel support your pre-defined position.

What a ****ing pussy. With the world's ugliest wife.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


You hide behind usenet calling people names, saying crappy things
about their families, etc, again all the while hiding like a scared
little punk, then have the audacity to call someone else a pussy? Look
in the mirror, lowlife.