| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 15:05:21 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... On Nov 5, 11:30?am, "Eisboch" wrote: Making boats lighter has more implications than saving a few bucks worth of fuel. Leave them heavy and drive slower, I say. Eisboch No problem for the trawler class- but as we know there is a point at which slowing down a planing hull becomes less economical than staying up on step. If the boat is slightly lighter it may be able to plane more quickly and stay on plane more efficiently. Offshore there is no replacement for displacement- but if the family bow rider destined to zoom around Lake Whatchamacallit on warm summer afternoons and in fair weather can be lightened up a few hundred pounds without sacrificing structural integrty- that's probably a good thing. Agreed. I thought we were talking about high end sportsfishing boats. To me, that means an offshore boat, but I hear you. I learned a lesson about the newer, lighter sportsfishing boats with the Egg Harbor I had. Beautiful boat ... well built ... but would loosen your fillings on a rough outing unless you slowed way down. I guess that's why I still like the Navigator. Not fast, but fast enough for fuel efficient cruising (which is my interest) and a soft, comfortable ride in some fairly heavy seas. And it doesn't have a low transom. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Boat Equipment -- Quality is Poor | Cruising | |||
| Boat Quality/Opinion Sources | General | |||
| Boat Quality.... | ASA | |||
| Bombardier sells rec vehicle business | General | |||
| Icelander Manufacturer | UK Power Boats | |||