On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:25:20 -0400, " JimH" ask wrote:


" JimH" ask wrote in message
.. .

"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message
. ..
HK wrote:
Microsoft: 88 Million Copies of Vista Shipped
Despite underwhelming consumers and being snubbed by enterprises,
Windows Vista's numbers keep growing.
Eric Lai, Computerworld
Friday, October 26, 2007 09:00 AM PDT

Despite underwhelming consumers and being snubbed by enterprises,
Windows Vista's numbers keep growing, with Microsoft Corp. saying
Thursday that it has now shipped *88 million copies* of the operating
system, almost double the number of copies of XP in the same amount of
time at its launch.

The 88 million figure mostly includes Vista-installed PCs bought by
consumers and small businesses,

JimH purchased Vista thinking it was great and the first thing he wanted
to do is figure out a way to tweak it so it wouldn't run so slow. It
just goes to show you PT Barnum was correct.

Hey dummy, I did not purchase Vista. I purchased a laptop with Vista for
my son.


BTW: Why are you so concerned about what decisions other people make?
What business is it of yours Jim Gallow, I mean Reggie? You are a regular
busybody.


Jimh, if you don't want comments about the decisions you make, why do you
continue to tell us all your decisions?

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:25:20 -0400, " JimH" ask wrote:

" JimH" ask wrote in message
...
"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message
. ..
HK wrote:
Microsoft: 88 Million Copies of Vista Shipped
Despite underwhelming consumers and being snubbed by enterprises,
Windows Vista's numbers keep growing.
Eric Lai, Computerworld
Friday, October 26, 2007 09:00 AM PDT

Despite underwhelming consumers and being snubbed by enterprises,
Windows Vista's numbers keep growing, with Microsoft Corp. saying
Thursday that it has now shipped *88 million copies* of the operating
system, almost double the number of copies of XP in the same amount of
time at its launch.
The 88 million figure mostly includes Vista-installed PCs bought by
consumers and small businesses,
JimH purchased Vista thinking it was great and the first thing he wanted
to do is figure out a way to tweak it so it wouldn't run so slow. It
just goes to show you PT Barnum was correct.
Hey dummy, I did not purchase Vista. I purchased a laptop with Vista for
my son.

BTW: Why are you so concerned about what decisions other people make?
What business is it of yours Jim Gallow, I mean Reggie? You are a regular
busybody.


Jimh, if you don't want comments about the decisions you make, why do you
continue to tell us all your decisions?

JohnH,
Don't you think that is a tad bit too obvious?

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:03:32 -0500, John H.
wrote:

if you don't want comments about the decisions you make, why do you
continue to tell us all your decisions?

It's a given that all decisions and opinions posted here will be
examined, parsed and discussed in great detail. Those with thin skins
should not bother.

Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:03:32 -0500, John H.
wrote:

if you don't want comments about the decisions you make, why do you
continue to tell us all your decisions?

It's a given that all decisions and opinions posted here will be
examined, parsed and discussed in great detail. Those with thin skins
should not bother.

Wayne,
I hate to have to correct you on every post you make, but I think you
forgot the part about beating a dead horse.

Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:03:32 -0500, John H.
wrote:

if you don't want comments about the decisions you make, why do you
continue to tell us all your decisions?

It's a given that all decisions and opinions posted here will be
examined, parsed and discussed in great detail.

Not by me. I already know whose posts are worth reading carefully and
whose are not. These days, I give your posts the 10 seconds they
deserve, but you do get more time than Reggie and a few others.

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:35:27 -0400, HK wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:03:32 -0500, John H.
wrote:

if you don't want comments about the decisions you make, why do you
continue to tell us all your decisions?

It's a given that all decisions and opinions posted here will be
examined, parsed and discussed in great detail.

Not by me. I already know whose posts are worth reading carefully and
whose are not. These days, I give your posts the 10 seconds they
deserve, but you do get more time than Reggie and a few others.

Do you spend a lot of time analyzing Jimh's decisions?

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:35:27 -0400, HK wrote:

Not by me. I already know whose posts are worth reading carefully and
whose are not. These days, I give your posts the 10 seconds they
deserve, but you do get more time than Reggie and a few others.

Harry, it bothers me not whether you read my posts or otherwise. Like
a good umpire, I'll continue to call things as I see them.