![]() |
Boat Radios, or Why I am not an Engineer
In article ,
Gene Kearns wrote: GMDSS is taking that general direction, but makes SSB and satellite phones look inexpensive. DSC might take care of some of those concerns if anybody would use it.... (but it isn't legal ship-to-shore.) How is that? Eg in Spain the MRCC is in the middle of the land, why should you not be allowed to call it via DSC? see eg http://www.kloth.net/radio/dsc.php DSC replaced the radio watch both on VHF and MF/HF - with the exception of countries where DSC has not been fully deployed. Most unfortunately the US is lagging some 10 years behind Europe in this respect. In Great Britain for example DSC has been fully operational in 1999. Because of the automated reception, and alarming functions, GMDSS is much more likely to get you help immediately. GMDSS comprises several systems, VHF/MF/HF DSC calls are just a part of it, EPIRBs, SART, Inmarsat-C functions are other parts of it. Marc -- remove bye and from mercial to get valid e-mail http://www.heusser.com |
Boat Radios, or Why I am not an Engineer
wrote in message oups.com... Hmmmm... Suprised that "Larry" hasn't yet jumped in on this particular thread. When it comes to communications he is one of our main squeezes... so to speak. (smile) 73 Bill (N6TGC) (Who is watching Southern California go up in flames) Anacapa Isle Marina Channel Islands Harbor Oxnard, California Drove though their yesterday and spent a night in Solvang. Smoke did not really clear until Pismo Beach. |
Boat Radios, or Why I am not an Engineer
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:44:19 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: Yeah..... but nothing (that I know of) that is available in your area. Everybody: Check this link out and send them your location. The more interest generated, the more quickly they will add coverage... http://www.seasmartvhf.com/about/index.html Notice the engines on those boats? http://www.seasmartvhf.com/subscription/index.html WHOO HOO!!! why 3? Not enough power in 1 or 2, or do they require 2 spares? |
Boat Radios, or Why I am not an Engineer
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:17:22 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: It would seem that the next logical evolution for VHF communications is for it to go to a totally digital format, rather than the analog system it remains. Digital will allow more available bandwidth for each frequency, would open up the possibility of full duplex communications and would provide clearer communications. NNNOOOOOOOOO!!!!! God save us from digital everything. Give me good old analog communications any day. With tubes. :) ~~ mutter - digital - phooey ~~ I agree that some things work or sound better using old vacuum tubes and analog amps. I have a Mesa Boogie guitar amp that has a sound that no solid state amp can reproduce. However .... I was just thinking the other day about how quickly technology(particularly in the various communication areas) has evolved over the past 50, 20 and even 10 years, primarily due to the conversion to digital systems ... and I am not referring simply to computers. HD TV, HD radio (even AM), DVD, CD, cell phones, GPS, .... the list goes on and on. And, as fiberoptic lines expand and replace cable lines, the digital age will grow even more. We've come a long way since I worked on a basic digital communications system .... FSK with 8 bit teletype machines, clacking away, mechanically generating a digital code. Eisboch |
Boat Radios, or Why I am not an Engineer
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... I'd still lke to know why you think duplex is so important. Try talking to my wife on a semi-duplex cell phone someday and you will understand. Eisboch |
Boat Radios, or Why I am not an Engineer
"Tim" wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 23, 10:29 am, HK wrote: So, I was thinking, what with all the technological advances in communications, why are we still stuck with VHF radios on our boats? The limitations of VHF radio are obvious to all of us, so there's no need to repeat them here. And I'm suggesting a move up to SSB or satellite telephones. Surely, there is a better way to handle boat to boat or boat to shore communciations, with features like duplex, much greater range, less static. Right? Well, I always thought these did a pretty good job. http://www.usswisconsin.org/Pictures...t%2024inc..JPG Ah, yet another example of digital communications. Eisboch |
Boat Radios, or Why I am not an Engineer
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:21:21 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message .. . I'd still lke to know why you think duplex is so important. Try talking to my wife on a semi-duplex cell phone someday and you will understand. If Mrs. E is anything like Mrs. Wave, you aren't going to say anything anyway which proves the point. You don't need duplex. :) |
Boat Radios, or Why I am not an Engineer
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:50:08 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:37:16 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:44:19 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: Yeah..... but nothing (that I know of) that is available in your area. Everybody: Check this link out and send them your location. The more interest generated, the more quickly they will add coverage... http://www.seasmartvhf.com/about/index.html Notice the engines on those boats? http://www.seasmartvhf.com/subscription/index.html WHOO HOO!!! Geeze Louise...... do they have to put three engines on one boat just to make sure they get back? Jealous. |
Boat Radios, or Why I am not an Engineer
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:26:24 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:44:19 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: Yeah..... but nothing (that I know of) that is available in your area. Everybody: Check this link out and send them your location. The more interest generated, the more quickly they will add coverage... http://www.seasmartvhf.com/about/index.html Notice the engines on those boats? http://www.seasmartvhf.com/subscription/index.html WHOO HOO!!! why 3? Not enough power in 1 or 2, or do they require 2 spares? Yeah, yeah, yeah... Ha, ha... |
Boat Radios, or Why I am not an Engineer
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:51:43 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:32:21 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Why would you want duplex? Uh? He likes to talk while the other party is talking? There is nothing wrong with simplex operation - you just need to keep your conversations to a minimum and short. This whole thing about duplex is silly - duplex doesn't give you any advantage at all and besides - technically, VHF isn't for conversation - theoritically. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com