On Oct 16, 12:00 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Oct 16, 5:52?am, BAR wrote:

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Oct 15, 7:44?am, wrote:
So then you must agree it is OK to alter the course of nature in order
to serve the growing human population?- Hide quoted text -

Careful, that statement is getting pretty close to recognizing the
possibility that a growing human population *could* "alter the course
of nature".

Why is that a bad thing? Isn't just the evolution of humans? We didn't
come out of the caves to build cities and then have to return to the
caves. Progress Chuck, its progressive.

You missed the point, probably my fault.

I see a disconnect between the concepts that "Man couldn't possibly
alter the global environment enough to contribute to global warming"
and
"Man has the right to alter the environment as much as he wants in
order to serve a growing population of human beings."

If you look hard enough into the disconnect you will see the
"somewhere in between" where a lot of us are. Not everyone is a
fundi' you know...I do however think it is hard for folks to see the
middle of the road, or accept that some might be there, from sooo far
off to one side...