On Oct 12, 2:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 12, 1:31 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 1:09 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message

...

"D.Duck" wrote in message
m...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 12, 8:51 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

glegroups.com...

On Oct 12, 8:40 am, "JimH" ask wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch"
wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment,
regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in 2000,
it
is
unlikely
he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't happening
in
any
way,
man made or otherwise.

Bullcrap.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Let the lemmings go. Hillary told them that, and they really
don't
have the guts to challenge. They are just ready for communism,
then
they won't have to think at all...

Here you go again, using words that have nothing to do with the
discussion
in progress. Who's telling you to say "communism"? 'Fess up.
Who's
coaching
you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yesterday the talking point he got from Limbaugh the drug addict
was
"socialist", today it's "communism".

Yes. Hugh Bimbo, as Michael Savage calls him. The bimbo who said
this:

"I always say my real purpose is to attract the largest audience I
can,
and hold it for as long as I can, so I can charge confiscatory
advertising rates," the talk show host says.

And what's wrong with that?

Nothing. It's free enterprise. But, it's got nothing to do with
improving
the country politically.

Agree. I will occasionally listen to Limbaugh, not for substance but
entertainment (to me) value.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hurmph... I find him kind of boring, of course I have not heard him
since 83' when they played it in the shop. Guess that's why I find it
funny that the intellectually dishonest here accuse me of it every
day It's easy for them, kind of like talk radio.. they don't really
want to work or produce a product anyone wants to hear, so they will
legislate themselves into an income, they really have not earned...
It's all about self indulgence, it's all about non-accountability.

OK - we've eliminated Hush Bimbo as the source for your silly use of the
word "communism", or sometimes "socialism". That means you just pull the
word outta your ass when you need to torpedo a discussion.- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Torpedo discussions? Next you will be accusing me of running from
accountability by linking to others thoughts, or asking silly
questions designed to "torpedo a discussion".

BTW, I answer most legit questions with my own thoughts. Most educated/
honest folks can understand that I am no english or communications
major, but at the same time clearly understand my thoughts. You may be
somewhat educated, however I doubt your ability to debate honestly. I
read the link you sent and as much as you don't like it, Rush seems to
work from a solid personal moral core, you should try it sometime, it
feels pretty good... right or wrong....

What you just said has nothing to do with your tossing around words that
have nothing to do with the discussion. Help me out here. Why do you do it?
Politicians who know what the words mean sometimes use them just to get
crowds of idiots to grunt and say "hell yeah", because the crowds have no
idea what they mean.

Is that why you use such words?

I suppose there's another possible reason, too horrible to consider: You are
completely unaware of typing the words.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

More baseless claimes and accusations. Yer' frekin' useless.

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 12, 2:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 12, 1:31 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 1:09 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message

...

"D.Duck" wrote in message
m...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 12, 8:51 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

glegroups.com...

On Oct 12, 8:40 am, "JimH" ask wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch"

wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment,
regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in
2000,
it
is
unlikely
he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't
happening
in
any
way,
man made or otherwise.

Bullcrap.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Let the lemmings go. Hillary told them that, and they
really
don't
have the guts to challenge. They are just ready for
communism,
then
they won't have to think at all...

Here you go again, using words that have nothing to do with
the
discussion
in progress. Who's telling you to say "communism"? 'Fess up.
Who's
coaching
you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yesterday the talking point he got from Limbaugh the drug
addict
was
"socialist", today it's "communism".

Yes. Hugh Bimbo, as Michael Savage calls him. The bimbo who
said
this:

"I always say my real purpose is to attract the largest
audience I
can,
and hold it for as long as I can, so I can charge confiscatory
advertising rates," the talk show host says.

And what's wrong with that?

Nothing. It's free enterprise. But, it's got nothing to do with
improving
the country politically.

Agree. I will occasionally listen to Limbaugh, not for substance
but
entertainment (to me) value.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hurmph... I find him kind of boring, of course I have not heard him
since 83' when they played it in the shop. Guess that's why I find
it
funny that the intellectually dishonest here accuse me of it every
day It's easy for them, kind of like talk radio.. they don't
really
want to work or produce a product anyone wants to hear, so they will
legislate themselves into an income, they really have not earned...
It's all about self indulgence, it's all about non-accountability.

OK - we've eliminated Hush Bimbo as the source for your silly use of
the
word "communism", or sometimes "socialism". That means you just pull
the
word outta your ass when you need to torpedo a discussion.- Hide
quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Torpedo discussions? Next you will be accusing me of running from
accountability by linking to others thoughts, or asking silly
questions designed to "torpedo a discussion".

BTW, I answer most legit questions with my own thoughts. Most educated/
honest folks can understand that I am no english or communications
major, but at the same time clearly understand my thoughts. You may be
somewhat educated, however I doubt your ability to debate honestly. I
read the link you sent and as much as you don't like it, Rush seems to
work from a solid personal moral core, you should try it sometime, it
feels pretty good... right or wrong....

What you just said has nothing to do with your tossing around words that
have nothing to do with the discussion. Help me out here. Why do you do
it?
Politicians who know what the words mean sometimes use them just to get
crowds of idiots to grunt and say "hell yeah", because the crowds have no
idea what they mean.

Is that why you use such words?

I suppose there's another possible reason, too horrible to consider: You
are
completely unaware of typing the words.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

More baseless claimes and accusations. Yer' frekin' useless.


Well, you tell me: Why do you use words like "communism" in a discussion
that has absolutely NOTHING to do with that economic system or any other.
Look up at the subject line, Clevis. "Gore Wins Nobel Price Prize".

Maybe I'm wrong. Tell me how communism fits this discussion. If I'm wrong,
I'll admit it.

On Oct 12, 2:18 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 12, 2:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

groups.com...

On Oct 12, 1:31 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 1:09 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message

...

"D.Duck" wrote in message
m...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 12, 8:51 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

glegroups.com...

On Oct 12, 8:40 am, "JimH" ask wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch"

wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and commitment,
regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in
2000,
it
is
unlikely
he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't
happening
in
any
way,
man made or otherwise.

Bullcrap.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Let the lemmings go. Hillary told them that, and they
really
don't
have the guts to challenge. They are just ready for
communism,
then
they won't have to think at all...

Here you go again, using words that have nothing to do with
the
discussion
in progress. Who's telling you to say "communism"? 'Fess up.
Who's
coaching
you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yesterday the talking point he got from Limbaugh the drug
addict
was
"socialist", today it's "communism".

Yes. Hugh Bimbo, as Michael Savage calls him. The bimbo who
said
this:

"I always say my real purpose is to attract the largest
audience I
can,
and hold it for as long as I can, so I can charge confiscatory
advertising rates," the talk show host says.

And what's wrong with that?

Nothing. It's free enterprise. But, it's got nothing to do with
improving
the country politically.

Agree. I will occasionally listen to Limbaugh, not for substance
but
entertainment (to me) value.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hurmph... I find him kind of boring, of course I have not heard him
since 83' when they played it in the shop. Guess that's why I find
it
funny that the intellectually dishonest here accuse me of it every
day It's easy for them, kind of like talk radio.. they don't
really
want to work or produce a product anyone wants to hear, so they will
legislate themselves into an income, they really have not earned...
It's all about self indulgence, it's all about non-accountability.

OK - we've eliminated Hush Bimbo as the source for your silly use of
the
word "communism", or sometimes "socialism". That means you just pull
the
word outta your ass when you need to torpedo a discussion.- Hide
quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Torpedo discussions? Next you will be accusing me of running from
accountability by linking to others thoughts, or asking silly
questions designed to "torpedo a discussion".

BTW, I answer most legit questions with my own thoughts. Most educated/
honest folks can understand that I am no english or communications
major, but at the same time clearly understand my thoughts. You may be
somewhat educated, however I doubt your ability to debate honestly. I
read the link you sent and as much as you don't like it, Rush seems to
work from a solid personal moral core, you should try it sometime, it
feels pretty good... right or wrong....

What you just said has nothing to do with your tossing around words that
have nothing to do with the discussion. Help me out here. Why do you do
it?
Politicians who know what the words mean sometimes use them just to get
crowds of idiots to grunt and say "hell yeah", because the crowds have no
idea what they mean.

Is that why you use such words?

I suppose there's another possible reason, too horrible to consider: You
are
completely unaware of typing the words.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

More baseless claimes and accusations. Yer' frekin' useless.

Well, you tell me: Why do you use words like "communism" in a discussion
that has absolutely NOTHING to do with that economic system or any other.
Look up at the subject line, Clevis. "Gore Wins Nobel Price Prize".

Maybe I'm wrong. Tell me how communism fits this discussion. If I'm wrong,
I'll admit it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


If I thought you were capable of honest debate, I would go back and
look, but you can't help yourself, I already answered you question as
to why I used the word, now you want me to explain why I used it
"then".. It's a silly game Joe. sorry, got no time for your games.

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Oct 12, 2:18 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 12, 2:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

groups.com...

On Oct 12, 1:31 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 1:09 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message

...

"D.Duck" wrote in message
m...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 12, 8:51 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
wrote in message

glegroups.com...

On Oct 12, 8:40 am, "JimH" ask wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch"

wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and
commitment,
regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in
2000,
it
is
unlikely
he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't
happening
in
any
way,
man made or otherwise.

Bullcrap.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Let the lemmings go. Hillary told them that, and they
really
don't
have the guts to challenge. They are just ready for
communism,
then
they won't have to think at all...

Here you go again, using words that have nothing to do
with
the
discussion
in progress. Who's telling you to say "communism"? 'Fess
up.
Who's
coaching
you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yesterday the talking point he got from Limbaugh the drug
addict
was
"socialist", today it's "communism".

Yes. Hugh Bimbo, as Michael Savage calls him. The bimbo who
said
this:

"I always say my real purpose is to attract the largest
audience I
can,
and hold it for as long as I can, so I can charge
confiscatory
advertising rates," the talk show host says.

And what's wrong with that?

Nothing. It's free enterprise. But, it's got nothing to do
with
improving
the country politically.

Agree. I will occasionally listen to Limbaugh, not for substance
but
entertainment (to me) value.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hurmph... I find him kind of boring, of course I have not heard
him
since 83' when they played it in the shop. Guess that's why I
find
it
funny that the intellectually dishonest here accuse me of it
every
day It's easy for them, kind of like talk radio.. they don't
really
want to work or produce a product anyone wants to hear, so they
will
legislate themselves into an income, they really have not
earned...
It's all about self indulgence, it's all about
non-accountability.

OK - we've eliminated Hush Bimbo as the source for your silly use
of
the
word "communism", or sometimes "socialism". That means you just
pull
the
word outta your ass when you need to torpedo a discussion.- Hide
quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Torpedo discussions? Next you will be accusing me of running from
accountability by linking to others thoughts, or asking silly
questions designed to "torpedo a discussion".

BTW, I answer most legit questions with my own thoughts. Most
educated/
honest folks can understand that I am no english or communications
major, but at the same time clearly understand my thoughts. You may
be
somewhat educated, however I doubt your ability to debate honestly.
I
read the link you sent and as much as you don't like it, Rush seems
to
work from a solid personal moral core, you should try it sometime,
it
feels pretty good... right or wrong....

What you just said has nothing to do with your tossing around words
that
have nothing to do with the discussion. Help me out here. Why do you
do
it?
Politicians who know what the words mean sometimes use them just to
get
crowds of idiots to grunt and say "hell yeah", because the crowds have
no
idea what they mean.

Is that why you use such words?

I suppose there's another possible reason, too horrible to consider:
You
are
completely unaware of typing the words.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

More baseless claimes and accusations. Yer' frekin' useless.

Well, you tell me: Why do you use words like "communism" in a discussion
that has absolutely NOTHING to do with that economic system or any other.
Look up at the subject line, Clevis. "Gore Wins Nobel Price Prize".

Maybe I'm wrong. Tell me how communism fits this discussion. If I'm
wrong,
I'll admit it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


If I thought you were capable of honest debate, I would go back and
look, but you can't help yourself, I already answered you question as
to why I used the word, now you want me to explain why I used it
"then".. It's a silly game Joe. sorry, got no time for your games.


I don't see where you explained it, unless you mean this:

"....I am no english or communications major, but at the same time clearly
understand my thoughts."

That's no excuse.

This seems like a good time for you to eliminate the words "communism" and
"socialism" from your vocabulary until you've spent some time at the
library.

On Oct 12, 2:34 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Oct 12, 2:18 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

groups.com...

On Oct 12, 2:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

groups.com...

On Oct 12, 1:31 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 1:09 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message

...

"D.Duck" wrote in message
m...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 12, 8:51 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
wrote in message

glegroups.com...

On Oct 12, 8:40 am, "JimH" ask wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch"

wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and
commitment,
regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor in
2000,
it
is
unlikely
he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't
happening
in
any
way,
man made or otherwise.

Bullcrap.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Let the lemmings go. Hillary told them that, and they
really
don't
have the guts to challenge. They are just ready for
communism,
then
they won't have to think at all...

Here you go again, using words that have nothing to do
with
the
discussion
in progress. Who's telling you to say "communism"? 'Fess
up.
Who's
coaching
you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yesterday the talking point he got from Limbaugh the drug
addict
was
"socialist", today it's "communism".

Yes. Hugh Bimbo, as Michael Savage calls him. The bimbo who
said
this:

"I always say my real purpose is to attract the largest
audience I
can,
and hold it for as long as I can, so I can charge
confiscatory
advertising rates," the talk show host says.

And what's wrong with that?

Nothing. It's free enterprise. But, it's got nothing to do
with
improving
the country politically.

Agree. I will occasionally listen to Limbaugh, not for substance
but
entertainment (to me) value.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hurmph... I find him kind of boring, of course I have not heard
him
since 83' when they played it in the shop. Guess that's why I
find
it
funny that the intellectually dishonest here accuse me of it
every
day It's easy for them, kind of like talk radio.. they don't
really
want to work or produce a product anyone wants to hear, so they
will
legislate themselves into an income, they really have not
earned...
It's all about self indulgence, it's all about
non-accountability.

OK - we've eliminated Hush Bimbo as the source for your silly use
of
the
word "communism", or sometimes "socialism". That means you just
pull
the
word outta your ass when you need to torpedo a discussion.- Hide
quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Torpedo discussions? Next you will be accusing me of running from
accountability by linking to others thoughts, or asking silly
questions designed to "torpedo a discussion".

BTW, I answer most legit questions with my own thoughts. Most
educated/
honest folks can understand that I am no english or communications
major, but at the same time clearly understand my thoughts. You may
be
somewhat educated, however I doubt your ability to debate honestly.
I
read the link you sent and as much as you don't like it, Rush seems
to
work from a solid personal moral core, you should try it sometime,
it
feels pretty good... right or wrong....

What you just said has nothing to do with your tossing around words
that
have nothing to do with the discussion. Help me out here. Why do you
do
it?
Politicians who know what the words mean sometimes use them just to
get
crowds of idiots to grunt and say "hell yeah", because the crowds have
no
idea what they mean.

Is that why you use such words?

I suppose there's another possible reason, too horrible to consider:
You
are
completely unaware of typing the words.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

More baseless claimes and accusations. Yer' frekin' useless.

Well, you tell me: Why do you use words like "communism" in a discussion
that has absolutely NOTHING to do with that economic system or any other.
Look up at the subject line, Clevis. "Gore Wins Nobel Price Prize".

Maybe I'm wrong. Tell me how communism fits this discussion. If I'm
wrong,
I'll admit it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If I thought you were capable of honest debate, I would go back and
look, but you can't help yourself, I already answered you question as
to why I used the word, now you want me to explain why I used it
"then".. It's a silly game Joe. sorry, got no time for your games.

I don't see where you explained it, unless you mean this:

"....I am no english or communications major, but at the same time clearly
understand my thoughts."

That's no excuse.

This seems like a good time for you to eliminate the words "communism" and
"socialism" from your vocabulary until you've spent some time at the
library.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You snipped my quote, how dishonest...

wrote in message
ps.com...
On Oct 12, 2:34 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Oct 12, 2:18 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

groups.com...

On Oct 12, 2:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

groups.com...

On Oct 12, 1:31 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 1:09 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message

...

"D.Duck" wrote in message
m...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in
message
...
wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 12, 8:51 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
wrote in message

glegroups.com...

On Oct 12, 8:40 am, "JimH" ask wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

On Oct 12, 7:05 am, "Eisboch"

wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...

- - -

A terrific honor for Al and the United States.

Yep, and congrats to him for his award and
commitment,
regardless of
whether
global warming is indeed, man induced.

It's ironic that had he been declared the victor
in
2000,
it
is
unlikely
he
would receiving a Nobel prize today.

Eisboch

Most republicans think that global warming isn't
happening
in
any
way,
man made or otherwise.

Bullcrap.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Let the lemmings go. Hillary told them that, and they
really
don't
have the guts to challenge. They are just ready for
communism,
then
they won't have to think at all...

Here you go again, using words that have nothing to do
with
the
discussion
in progress. Who's telling you to say "communism"?
'Fess
up.
Who's
coaching
you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yesterday the talking point he got from Limbaugh the
drug
addict
was
"socialist", today it's "communism".

Yes. Hugh Bimbo, as Michael Savage calls him. The bimbo
who
said
this:

"I always say my real purpose is to attract the largest
audience I
can,
and hold it for as long as I can, so I can charge
confiscatory
advertising rates," the talk show host says.

And what's wrong with that?

Nothing. It's free enterprise. But, it's got nothing to do
with
improving
the country politically.

Agree. I will occasionally listen to Limbaugh, not for
substance
but
entertainment (to me) value.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hurmph... I find him kind of boring, of course I have not
heard
him
since 83' when they played it in the shop. Guess that's why I
find
it
funny that the intellectually dishonest here accuse me of it
every
day It's easy for them, kind of like talk radio.. they don't
really
want to work or produce a product anyone wants to hear, so
they
will
legislate themselves into an income, they really have not
earned...
It's all about self indulgence, it's all about
non-accountability.

OK - we've eliminated Hush Bimbo as the source for your silly
use
of
the
word "communism", or sometimes "socialism". That means you just
pull
the
word outta your ass when you need to torpedo a discussion.- Hide
quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Torpedo discussions? Next you will be accusing me of running from
accountability by linking to others thoughts, or asking silly
questions designed to "torpedo a discussion".

BTW, I answer most legit questions with my own thoughts. Most
educated/
honest folks can understand that I am no english or
communications
major, but at the same time clearly understand my thoughts. You
may
be
somewhat educated, however I doubt your ability to debate
honestly.
I
read the link you sent and as much as you don't like it, Rush
seems
to
work from a solid personal moral core, you should try it
sometime,
it
feels pretty good... right or wrong....

What you just said has nothing to do with your tossing around words
that
have nothing to do with the discussion. Help me out here. Why do
you
do
it?
Politicians who know what the words mean sometimes use them just to
get
crowds of idiots to grunt and say "hell yeah", because the crowds
have
no
idea what they mean.

Is that why you use such words?

I suppose there's another possible reason, too horrible to
consider:
You
are
completely unaware of typing the words.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

More baseless claimes and accusations. Yer' frekin' useless.

Well, you tell me: Why do you use words like "communism" in a
discussion
that has absolutely NOTHING to do with that economic system or any
other.
Look up at the subject line, Clevis. "Gore Wins Nobel Price Prize".

Maybe I'm wrong. Tell me how communism fits this discussion. If I'm
wrong,
I'll admit it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If I thought you were capable of honest debate, I would go back and
look, but you can't help yourself, I already answered you question as
to why I used the word, now you want me to explain why I used it
"then".. It's a silly game Joe. sorry, got no time for your games.

I don't see where you explained it, unless you mean this:

"....I am no english or communications major, but at the same time
clearly
understand my thoughts."

That's no excuse.

This seems like a good time for you to eliminate the words "communism"
and
"socialism" from your vocabulary until you've spent some time at the
library.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You snipped my quote, how dishonest...


If I could send you a shovel, I would gladly do so.

On Oct 12, 2:51 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:

You snipped my quote, how dishonest...

If I could send you a shovel, I would gladly do so.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You snipped my quote. Oh, and I see called me more names while I was
out. You got nothing Doug...

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:34:50 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

This seems like a good time for you to eliminate the words "communism" and
"socialism" from your vocabulary until you've spent some time at the
library.

In Marxist theory, communism is a system of organization based on the
holding of all property in common with actual actual ownership being
ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.

Socialism is the stage following capitalism in the transition of a
society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of
collectivist principles according to Marx.

Those are the classic interpretations.

Apply them at your peril. :)

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:34:50 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

This seems like a good time for you to eliminate the words "communism" and
"socialism" from your vocabulary until you've spent some time at the
library.

In Marxist theory, communism is a system of organization based on the
holding of all property in common with actual actual ownership being
ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.

Socialism is the stage following capitalism in the transition of a
society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of
collectivist principles according to Marx.

Those are the classic interpretations.

Apply them at your peril. :)

Do we need an interpreter or something? I know what the words mean. He does
not. They have nothing to do with this Nobel prize discussion, and THAT IS
MY BEEF with your little puppy. He, like millions of others, uses words he
doesn't understand, in contexts where they have no purpose.

He does this because at the moment when he has an uncontrollable need to
write something, anything, he just reaches into his panties and you've seen
the result.

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:53:29 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:34:50 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

This seems like a good time for you to eliminate the words "communism" and
"socialism" from your vocabulary until you've spent some time at the
library.

In Marxist theory, communism is a system of organization based on the
holding of all property in common with actual actual ownership being
ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.

Socialism is the stage following capitalism in the transition of a
society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of
collectivist principles according to Marx.

Those are the classic interpretations.

Apply them at your peril. :)

Do we need an interpreter or something? I know what the words mean. He does
not. They have nothing to do with this Nobel prize discussion, and THAT IS
MY BEEF with your little puppy. He, like millions of others, uses words he
doesn't understand, in contexts where they have no purpose.

He does this because at the moment when he has an uncontrollable need to
write something, anything, he just reaches into his panties and you've seen
the result.

I'll just say this and I'm leaving this "discussion" to you.

Your stock in trade lately is insult and I had thought you were
smarter than that.