Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
wrote in message
ps.com... On Oct 10, 10:20 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:08:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:00:31 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:21:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:s4kpg3hla3e8geolp7v5o42sj1ma4cmhlj@4ax. com... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:30:43 -0400, HK wrote: I don't want to get into the politics of their positions, but if you watched the GOP debate/discussion yesterday, what did you think of the candidates as performers? I thought Guiliani and Romney did the best sales job in terms of their grasp of issues and hard-driving presentation, but I liked Mike Huckabee the best. He seems the most sincere and decent. Fred Thompson looked old, unprepared, out of place, even though he told a couple of cute jokes. McCain is trying too hard and it shows. The rest of the crew should drop out now. Agree with Eisboch's comment. Obama should give Huckabee his donation money. Huckabee could put it to some good use. McCain should do the same thing. trolling trolling trolling.... The difference is much too subtle for you. No. Anything you disagree with, or forces you to think, you consider out of bounds. If you knew anything at all about Romney, you'd know he's a chameleon. He'll say whatever his audience hopes for with regard to certain subjects. He's stated so many different things with regard to reproductive choice that his critics call him Mr. Multiple Choice. And, he criticizes universal health care by calling it a socialist idea, even though Clinton's suggestions are very similar to the one Romney himself promoted in Massachusetts. You should expand your universe of news sources to include some that are intended for adults who give a damn about this country. ...like I said. You'll probably choose your candidate in the same way as a 20 year old girl interviewed on NPR just after the last election. She voted for Bush because she thought he had cute ears. ...over the ocean blue... By the way, net cop, I wasn't about to debate reproductive rights issues. I was simply pointing out that Romney changes his stance on these issues depending on his audience, so there's really no way to know where he'll land if elected. How you haven't seen this is beyond me. But, you probably wear safety glasses when brushing your teeth, so anything's possible.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, and Hillary is solid as a rock, right? I don't hear Romney taking 4 positions on an issue, with four different dialects, in one day. Not to mention, at least Romney is willing to stand up in front of a hostile interivew and explain his posititions and their evolution. Not on dem (Hillary) will even take unscripted questions, much less address the other half of the country. Everytime she gets a quesiton she doesn't like, she attacks the questioner, it is a tactic developed by the Clintons back a few years ago... They just call it a vast right wing conspiracy, and dodge.. All the time setting up groups like Media Matters to lie and run interferance.. Meanwhile, he uses the words "socialized medicine" to describe other people's health care ideas, while conveniently forgetting that many of these plans are almost identical to the one he promoted in Massachusetts. You probably don't understand why this is odd. |
#22
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
On Oct 10, 10:49 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ps.com... On Oct 10, 10:20 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:08:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:00:31 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:21:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:s4kpg3hla3e8geolp7v5o42sj1ma4cmhlj@4ax. com... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:30:43 -0400, HK wrote: I don't want to get into the politics of their positions, but if you watched the GOP debate/discussion yesterday, what did you think of the candidates as performers? I thought Guiliani and Romney did the best sales job in terms of their grasp of issues and hard-driving presentation, but I liked Mike Huckabee the best. He seems the most sincere and decent. Fred Thompson looked old, unprepared, out of place, even though he told a couple of cute jokes. McCain is trying too hard and it shows. The rest of the crew should drop out now. Agree with Eisboch's comment. Obama should give Huckabee his donation money. Huckabee could put it to some good use. McCain should do the same thing. trolling trolling trolling.... The difference is much too subtle for you. No. Anything you disagree with, or forces you to think, you consider out of bounds. If you knew anything at all about Romney, you'd know he's a chameleon. He'll say whatever his audience hopes for with regard to certain subjects. He's stated so many different things with regard to reproductive choice that his critics call him Mr. Multiple Choice. And, he criticizes universal health care by calling it a socialist idea, even though Clinton's suggestions are very similar to the one Romney himself promoted in Massachusetts. You should expand your universe of news sources to include some that are intended for adults who give a damn about this country. ...like I said. You'll probably choose your candidate in the same way as a 20 year old girl interviewed on NPR just after the last election. She voted for Bush because she thought he had cute ears. ...over the ocean blue... By the way, net cop, I wasn't about to debate reproductive rights issues. I was simply pointing out that Romney changes his stance on these issues depending on his audience, so there's really no way to know where he'll land if elected. How you haven't seen this is beyond me. But, you probably wear safety glasses when brushing your teeth, so anything's possible.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, and Hillary is solid as a rock, right? I don't hear Romney taking 4 positions on an issue, with four different dialects, in one day. Not to mention, at least Romney is willing to stand up in front of a hostile interivew and explain his posititions and their evolution. Not on dem (Hillary) will even take unscripted questions, much less address the other half of the country. Everytime she gets a quesiton she doesn't like, she attacks the questioner, it is a tactic developed by the Clintons back a few years ago... They just call it a vast right wing conspiracy, and dodge.. All the time setting up groups like Media Matters to lie and run interferance.. Meanwhile, he uses the words "socialized medicine" to describe other people's health care ideas, while conveniently forgetting that many of these plans are almost identical to the one he promoted in Massachusetts. You probably don't understand why this is odd.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What is with the constant accusations that folks that don't agree with you "don't understand' or "don't read" or "don't care"... Do you understand the concept of a Democratic Republic?? Do you understand that the country is bigger than your basement apartment and a stack of playboy magazines? I think you are stuck in a teenage fantasy, go back to Jon Stewart, he seems to think at your level... Intolerant, and ignorant... |
#23
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:11:32 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: Which stance did Romney take on reproductive rights? I'm constantly amused by the phrase - "reproductive rights". What exactly are "reproductive rights"? |
#24
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
wrote in message
ups.com... On Oct 10, 10:49 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ps.com... On Oct 10, 10:20 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:08:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:00:31 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:21:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:s4kpg3hla3e8geolp7v5o42sj1ma4cmhlj@4ax. com... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:30:43 -0400, HK wrote: I don't want to get into the politics of their positions, but if you watched the GOP debate/discussion yesterday, what did you think of the candidates as performers? I thought Guiliani and Romney did the best sales job in terms of their grasp of issues and hard-driving presentation, but I liked Mike Huckabee the best. He seems the most sincere and decent. Fred Thompson looked old, unprepared, out of place, even though he told a couple of cute jokes. McCain is trying too hard and it shows. The rest of the crew should drop out now. Agree with Eisboch's comment. Obama should give Huckabee his donation money. Huckabee could put it to some good use. McCain should do the same thing. trolling trolling trolling.... The difference is much too subtle for you. No. Anything you disagree with, or forces you to think, you consider out of bounds. If you knew anything at all about Romney, you'd know he's a chameleon. He'll say whatever his audience hopes for with regard to certain subjects. He's stated so many different things with regard to reproductive choice that his critics call him Mr. Multiple Choice. And, he criticizes universal health care by calling it a socialist idea, even though Clinton's suggestions are very similar to the one Romney himself promoted in Massachusetts. You should expand your universe of news sources to include some that are intended for adults who give a damn about this country. ...like I said. You'll probably choose your candidate in the same way as a 20 year old girl interviewed on NPR just after the last election. She voted for Bush because she thought he had cute ears. ...over the ocean blue... By the way, net cop, I wasn't about to debate reproductive rights issues. I was simply pointing out that Romney changes his stance on these issues depending on his audience, so there's really no way to know where he'll land if elected. How you haven't seen this is beyond me. But, you probably wear safety glasses when brushing your teeth, so anything's possible.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, and Hillary is solid as a rock, right? I don't hear Romney taking 4 positions on an issue, with four different dialects, in one day. Not to mention, at least Romney is willing to stand up in front of a hostile interivew and explain his posititions and their evolution. Not on dem (Hillary) will even take unscripted questions, much less address the other half of the country. Everytime she gets a quesiton she doesn't like, she attacks the questioner, it is a tactic developed by the Clintons back a few years ago... They just call it a vast right wing conspiracy, and dodge.. All the time setting up groups like Media Matters to lie and run interferance.. Meanwhile, he uses the words "socialized medicine" to describe other people's health care ideas, while conveniently forgetting that many of these plans are almost identical to the one he promoted in Massachusetts. You probably don't understand why this is odd.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What is with the constant accusations that folks that don't agree with you "don't understand' or "don't read" or "don't care"... Do you understand the concept of a Democratic Republic?? Do you understand that the country is bigger than your basement apartment and a stack of playboy magazines? I think you are stuck in a teenage fantasy, go back to Jon Stewart, he seems to think at your level... Intolerant, and ignorant... What I understand is that it's obscene for politicians to use words inaccurately, just because certain words are known to elicit a response from an audience which also doesn't understand that they're being assaulted with the wrong words. It sure works well, though. "socialized medicine" (like the Veteran's Administration) "fight them there so we don't have to fight them there" "Bring 'em on!" "cut & run" |
#25
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:00:31 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: If you knew anything at all about Romney, you'd know he's a chameleon. He'll say whatever his audience hopes for with regard to certain subjects. It's called triangulation - look it up. He's stated so many different things with regard to reproductive choice Now it's "reproductive choice"? Please to 'splain this "reproductive choice". |
#26
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
On Oct 10, 10:59 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... On Oct 10, 10:49 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 10, 10:20 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:08:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:00:31 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:21:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:s4kpg3hla3e8geolp7v5o42sj1ma4cmhlj@4ax. com... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:30:43 -0400, HK wrote: I don't want to get into the politics of their positions, but if you watched the GOP debate/discussion yesterday, what did you think of the candidates as performers? I thought Guiliani and Romney did the best sales job in terms of their grasp of issues and hard-driving presentation, but I liked Mike Huckabee the best. He seems the most sincere and decent. Fred Thompson looked old, unprepared, out of place, even though he told a couple of cute jokes. McCain is trying too hard and it shows. The rest of the crew should drop out now. Agree with Eisboch's comment. Obama should give Huckabee his donation money. Huckabee could put it to some good use. McCain should do the same thing. trolling trolling trolling.... The difference is much too subtle for you. No. Anything you disagree with, or forces you to think, you consider out of bounds. If you knew anything at all about Romney, you'd know he's a chameleon. He'll say whatever his audience hopes for with regard to certain subjects. He's stated so many different things with regard to reproductive choice that his critics call him Mr. Multiple Choice. And, he criticizes universal health care by calling it a socialist idea, even though Clinton's suggestions are very similar to the one Romney himself promoted in Massachusetts. You should expand your universe of news sources to include some that are intended for adults who give a damn about this country. ...like I said. You'll probably choose your candidate in the same way as a 20 year old girl interviewed on NPR just after the last election. She voted for Bush because she thought he had cute ears. ...over the ocean blue... By the way, net cop, I wasn't about to debate reproductive rights issues. I was simply pointing out that Romney changes his stance on these issues depending on his audience, so there's really no way to know where he'll land if elected. How you haven't seen this is beyond me. But, you probably wear safety glasses when brushing your teeth, so anything's possible.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, and Hillary is solid as a rock, right? I don't hear Romney taking 4 positions on an issue, with four different dialects, in one day. Not to mention, at least Romney is willing to stand up in front of a hostile interivew and explain his posititions and their evolution. Not on dem (Hillary) will even take unscripted questions, much less address the other half of the country. Everytime she gets a quesiton she doesn't like, she attacks the questioner, it is a tactic developed by the Clintons back a few years ago... They just call it a vast right wing conspiracy, and dodge.. All the time setting up groups like Media Matters to lie and run interferance.. Meanwhile, he uses the words "socialized medicine" to describe other people's health care ideas, while conveniently forgetting that many of these plans are almost identical to the one he promoted in Massachusetts. You probably don't understand why this is odd.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What is with the constant accusations that folks that don't agree with you "don't understand' or "don't read" or "don't care"... Do you understand the concept of a Democratic Republic?? Do you understand that the country is bigger than your basement apartment and a stack of playboy magazines? I think you are stuck in a teenage fantasy, go back to Jon Stewart, he seems to think at your level... Intolerant, and ignorant... What I understand is that it's obscene for politicians to use words inaccurately, just because certain words are known to elicit a response from an audience which also doesn't understand that they're being assaulted with the wrong words. It sure works well, though. "socialized medicine" (like the Veteran's Administration) "fight them there so we don't have to fight them there" "Bring 'em on!" "cut & run"- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But you will of course defend Hillarys three dilects in one week. Oh, and how do you feel about Sandy Berger who will be getting his security clearance sept next being Secretary of Defence, or State. I am sure you thought Craig should resign for toe tapping, how do you feel about treason? Until you can look beyond your personal issues, and do some real thinking, you are dismissed... |
#27
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:00:31 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If you knew anything at all about Romney, you'd know he's a chameleon. He'll say whatever his audience hopes for with regard to certain subjects. It's called triangulation - look it up. He's stated so many different things with regard to reproductive choice Now it's "reproductive choice"? Please to 'splain this "reproductive choice". In my household, "reproductive choice" means it is entirely up to a woman whether she wants to become pregnant and, if she does, whether she wants the pregnancy to continue. Simple enough. We're 100% "reproductive choice" here. Many of the Republican candidates are anti-abortion. That's the real definition of "pro-life." |
#28
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:11:32 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: Which stance did Romney take on reproductive rights? I'm constantly amused by the phrase - "reproductive rights". What exactly are "reproductive rights"? Example: Deciding whether to continue a pregnancy after a woman's been raped. |
#29
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
wrote in message
oups.com... On Oct 10, 10:59 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ups.com... On Oct 10, 10:49 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 10, 10:20 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:08:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:00:31 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:21:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:s4kpg3hla3e8geolp7v5o42sj1ma4cmhlj@4ax. com... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:30:43 -0400, HK wrote: I don't want to get into the politics of their positions, but if you watched the GOP debate/discussion yesterday, what did you think of the candidates as performers? I thought Guiliani and Romney did the best sales job in terms of their grasp of issues and hard-driving presentation, but I liked Mike Huckabee the best. He seems the most sincere and decent. Fred Thompson looked old, unprepared, out of place, even though he told a couple of cute jokes. McCain is trying too hard and it shows. The rest of the crew should drop out now. Agree with Eisboch's comment. Obama should give Huckabee his donation money. Huckabee could put it to some good use. McCain should do the same thing. trolling trolling trolling.... The difference is much too subtle for you. No. Anything you disagree with, or forces you to think, you consider out of bounds. If you knew anything at all about Romney, you'd know he's a chameleon. He'll say whatever his audience hopes for with regard to certain subjects. He's stated so many different things with regard to reproductive choice that his critics call him Mr. Multiple Choice. And, he criticizes universal health care by calling it a socialist idea, even though Clinton's suggestions are very similar to the one Romney himself promoted in Massachusetts. You should expand your universe of news sources to include some that are intended for adults who give a damn about this country. ...like I said. You'll probably choose your candidate in the same way as a 20 year old girl interviewed on NPR just after the last election. She voted for Bush because she thought he had cute ears. ...over the ocean blue... By the way, net cop, I wasn't about to debate reproductive rights issues. I was simply pointing out that Romney changes his stance on these issues depending on his audience, so there's really no way to know where he'll land if elected. How you haven't seen this is beyond me. But, you probably wear safety glasses when brushing your teeth, so anything's possible.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, and Hillary is solid as a rock, right? I don't hear Romney taking 4 positions on an issue, with four different dialects, in one day. Not to mention, at least Romney is willing to stand up in front of a hostile interivew and explain his posititions and their evolution. Not on dem (Hillary) will even take unscripted questions, much less address the other half of the country. Everytime she gets a quesiton she doesn't like, she attacks the questioner, it is a tactic developed by the Clintons back a few years ago... They just call it a vast right wing conspiracy, and dodge.. All the time setting up groups like Media Matters to lie and run interferance.. Meanwhile, he uses the words "socialized medicine" to describe other people's health care ideas, while conveniently forgetting that many of these plans are almost identical to the one he promoted in Massachusetts. You probably don't understand why this is odd.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What is with the constant accusations that folks that don't agree with you "don't understand' or "don't read" or "don't care"... Do you understand the concept of a Democratic Republic?? Do you understand that the country is bigger than your basement apartment and a stack of playboy magazines? I think you are stuck in a teenage fantasy, go back to Jon Stewart, he seems to think at your level... Intolerant, and ignorant... What I understand is that it's obscene for politicians to use words inaccurately, just because certain words are known to elicit a response from an audience which also doesn't understand that they're being assaulted with the wrong words. It sure works well, though. "socialized medicine" (like the Veteran's Administration) "fight them there so we don't have to fight them there" "Bring 'em on!" "cut & run"- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But you will of course defend Hillarys three dilects in one week. You may have noticed that I expressed disdain for ALL politicians who insult citizens this way. Oh, and how do you feel about Sandy Berger who will be getting his security clearance sept next being Secretary of Defence, or State. Bad idea. Just as bad as this, which I suspect you haven't seen yet: http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/200.../index.html?hp I am sure you thought Craig should resign for toe tapping Absolutely. There's no law against being a hypocrite, but it's still obnoxious, and he was the poster boy. |
#30
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
On Oct 10, 11:14 am, HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:00:31 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: If you knew anything at all about Romney, you'd know he's a chameleon. He'll say whatever his audience hopes for with regard to certain subjects. It's called triangulation - look it up. He's stated so many different things with regard to reproductive choice Now it's "reproductive choice"? Please to 'splain this "reproductive choice". In my household, "reproductive choice" means it is entirely up to a woman whether she wants to become pregnant and, if she does, whether she wants the pregnancy to continue. Simple enough. We're 100% "reproductive choice" here. Many of the Republican candidates are anti-abortion. That's the real definition of "pro-life."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I understand your positition, unless it has changed in the last few years, you beleive in choice with no parental notification right down to grade school... Don't make me google this, you said it. Does the father have a choice? Do my kids have a chioce, say they want to carry a bible to school? Or have a negative opinion of gays? How about recruit for the military? Make a commercial? Have an airshow? Celebrate Christmas and Easter??? Of course not, you do not beleive in "choice" you beleive in self indulgence... Like most ideological liberals, which unfortunately seems to be the mainstream lately... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
judging current; rules of thumb? | ASA | |||
Judging by the large number of military... | General | |||
you won't reject me judging before your sharp hallway | ASA | |||
get your wickedly judging exit towards my hair | ASA | |||
you won't tease me judging over your smart doorway | ASA |