|
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
SHIPBUILDING
-Our shipyard is situated in the center of the port of ShangHai which provides optimum geographical advantages for the shipbuilding industry and has built various types of ship. -Our shipyard has gained an excellent reputation both at home and abroad for building high quality ships, which is attributable to its advanced technology and varied experience acquired since 1986. Our shipyard is capable of building all types of vessels up to 35,000 DWT. -We can assure our clients of our strenuous effort to satisfy their needs at the most competitive price and in the shortest possible time. MAJOR PRODUCTS -Container Ships: nominal capacity up to 1,800 TEU -Bulk Carriers: Cement, Coal, Fertilizer, Log, Steel Products Carrier up to DWT 30,000 -Tankers: Oil and Chemicals Tanker up to DWT 35,000 -MPC & General Cargo Ships: All types of vessel up to DWT 30,000 -RO/RO Ships: Various types of RO/RO Ships up to DWT 10,000 -Special Purpose Vessels: Research Vessel, Training Ship, Floating Dock, Floating Crane, Pleasure Boat, Hospital Ship, Patrol Boat Please feel free to navigate through any subject of your interest and explore what products and services our Shipyards Group is able to offer. +86-13761696211 http://www.shipmkt.com |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:10:50 -0000, shipmk wrote:
-Special Purpose Vessels: Research Vessel, Training Ship, Floating Dock, Floating Crane, Pleasure Boat, Hospital Ship, Patrol Boat Can you build a low transom 21 foot center console? |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:10:50 -0000, shipmk wrote: -Special Purpose Vessels: Research Vessel, Training Ship, Floating Dock, Floating Crane, Pleasure Boat, Hospital Ship, Patrol Boat Can you build a low transom 21 foot center console? Why would anyone want to build one of those? |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Oct 8, 10:35 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:10:50 -0000, shipmk wrote: -Special Purpose Vessels: Research Vessel, Training Ship, Floating Dock, Floating Crane, Pleasure Boat, Hospital Ship, Patrol Boat Can you build a low transom 21 foot center console? Why would anyone want to build one of those? Fishermen love em' They add structure to the bottom... |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
|
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
|
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
wrote: On Oct 8, 10:35 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:10:50 -0000, shipmk wrote: -Special Purpose Vessels: Research Vessel, Training Ship, Floating Dock, Floating Crane, Pleasure Boat, Hospital Ship, Patrol Boat Can you build a low transom 21 foot center console? Why would anyone want to build one of those? Fishermen love em' They add structure to the bottom... But they are not big enough to really provide a good home for the monster fish. Now if you tie together about 10 of them, now that would be some good structure. This coming from Reggie, a guy who brownstains his shorts when other posters here ask about his boat. |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:35:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:10:50 -0000, shipmk wrote: -Special Purpose Vessels: Research Vessel, Training Ship, Floating Dock, Floating Crane, Pleasure Boat, Hospital Ship, Patrol Boat Can you build a low transom 21 foot center console? Why would anyone want to build one of those? There are some who believe that wet decks and unstable platforms in stern seas are a plus. It's a kind of "macho" thing. Not to mention any names of course, but a set of initials might just look like... Well, let's just leave it at that. Plus, based on Gene's story, they make good artificial reefs. :) |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
|
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Oct 8, 10:51 am, HK wrote:
wrote: On Oct 8, 10:35 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:10:50 -0000, shipmk wrote: -Special Purpose Vessels: Research Vessel, Training Ship, Floating Dock, Floating Crane, Pleasure Boat, Hospital Ship, Patrol Boat Can you build a low transom 21 foot center console? Why would anyone want to build one of those? Fishermen love em' They add structure to the bottom... I suspect it would take you about a millisecond to say yes if someone offered you an even swap, my Parker rig for your rig. :}- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Maybe if you put on a coat of wax and some nose art;) |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
|
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Oct 8, 11:08 am, HK wrote:
wrote: On Oct 8, 10:51 am, HK wrote: wrote: On Oct 8, 10:35 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:10:50 -0000, shipmk wrote: -Special Purpose Vessels: Research Vessel, Training Ship, Floating Dock, Floating Crane, Pleasure Boat, Hospital Ship, Patrol Boat Can you build a low transom 21 foot center console? Why would anyone want to build one of those? Fishermen love em' They add structure to the bottom... I suspect it would take you about a millisecond to say yes if someone offered you an even swap, my Parker rig for your rig. :}- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Maybe if you put on a coat of wax and some nose art;) Just put on another coat of Collinate paste on the hullsides, outside and in, and Woodywax on the non-skid. The nose art is up to you. Might I suggest a cartoon of a Parker 21 eating one of those low-sided, wet riding, Ranger "small craft" bay boats.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They are only wet if you hook the Captains' hat with the treble hook... In which case I guess there are two options. Overboard, or stuffed in the livewell with those toothy bluefish;) |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:35:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:10:50 -0000, shipmk wrote: -Special Purpose Vessels: Research Vessel, Training Ship, Floating Dock, Floating Crane, Pleasure Boat, Hospital Ship, Patrol Boat Can you build a low transom 21 foot center console? Why would anyone want to build one of those? There are some who believe that wet decks and unstable platforms in stern seas are a plus. It's a kind of "macho" thing. Not to mention any names of course, but a set of initials might just look like... Well, let's just leave it at that. Plus, based on Gene's story, they make good artificial reefs. :) Speaking of wet decks, this is a 22' Bay Ranger: http://tinyurl.com/2rlax5 Specs say it is only 16.5" deep from the cockpit sole to the gunnels...couple of interesting broadsides, and glug, glug, glug. Nice boat for the Florida flats or the North Florida ICW...I'd certainly not take it out in the ocean or a big bay. |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:44:30 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: wrote: On Oct 8, 10:35 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:10:50 -0000, shipmk wrote: -Special Purpose Vessels: Research Vessel, Training Ship, Floating Dock, Floating Crane, Pleasure Boat, Hospital Ship, Patrol Boat Can you build a low transom 21 foot center console? Why would anyone want to build one of those? Fishermen love em' They add structure to the bottom... But they are not big enough to really provide a good home for the monster fish. Now if you tie together about 10 of them, now that would be some good structure. Funny you should mention that. One of the more interesting things I did last week, besides testing boats that is, was attending a seminar on artificial reefs. It was very interesting and a lot of really good science was presented. Lots of data points including information on the building process and discussion was lively and very civil. One of the more intriguing presentations was done by a USFW service biologist who really had a handle on the whole process. What was startling was his belief, backed by some very solid empirical and scientific evidence, that artificial reefs tended to aggragate fish stocks and not create new fish stocks. His point was that aggragating fish stocks by building artificial reefs may not be the most desirable way to protect over utilized species instead opting for more aggressive enforcement of current regulations even up to and including quota enforcement and commercial fishing buyouts. To say that viewpoint was well received by the commercial types would be a lie, but he held his ground and presented some very compelling evidence that he was right. I'm not totally convinced, but he made me think more about the process. |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: wrote: On Oct 8, 10:35 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:10:50 -0000, shipmk wrote: -Special Purpose Vessels: Research Vessel, Training Ship, Floating Dock, Floating Crane, Pleasure Boat, Hospital Ship, Patrol Boat Can you build a low transom 21 foot center console? Why would anyone want to build one of those? Fishermen love em' They add structure to the bottom... But they are not big enough to really provide a good home for the monster fish. Now if you tie together about 10 of them, now that would be some good structure. This coming from Reggie, a guy who brownstains his shorts when other posters here ask about his boat. No it doesn't bother me at all for anyone to ask me any question at all. |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:16:13 -0400, HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:35:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:10:50 -0000, shipmk wrote: -Special Purpose Vessels: Research Vessel, Training Ship, Floating Dock, Floating Crane, Pleasure Boat, Hospital Ship, Patrol Boat Can you build a low transom 21 foot center console? Why would anyone want to build one of those? There are some who believe that wet decks and unstable platforms in stern seas are a plus. It's a kind of "macho" thing. Not to mention any names of course, but a set of initials might just look like... Well, let's just leave it at that. Plus, based on Gene's story, they make good artificial reefs. :) Speaking of wet decks, this is a 22' Bay Ranger: http://tinyurl.com/2rlax5 Specs say it is only 16.5" deep from the cockpit sole to the gunnels...couple of interesting broadsides, and glug, glug, glug. Nice boat for the Florida flats or the North Florida ICW...I'd certainly not take it out in the ocean or a big bay. Tell you what - let's do a little "test". I'll bring my Ranger down there when I leave for SC next week and on my way back, we'll put your Parker up against my Ranger in some heavy wakes or seas. Broadside. I guarentee you I will be nice and dry and you will be soaked. No boots - deck shoes for evidence. And just for giggles, let's see if your 150 Yamaha can pull the stern of my Ranger under. Then we'll see if my ETEC can pull the stern of your Parker under. How 'bout it? Up for it? :) |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:48:00 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: No it doesn't bother me at all for anyone to ask me any question at all. What is the sound of one hand clapping? Secondly, if you are lost and come to a fork in the road, which one do you take? |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:16:13 -0400, HK wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:35:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:10:50 -0000, shipmk wrote: -Special Purpose Vessels: Research Vessel, Training Ship, Floating Dock, Floating Crane, Pleasure Boat, Hospital Ship, Patrol Boat Can you build a low transom 21 foot center console? Why would anyone want to build one of those? There are some who believe that wet decks and unstable platforms in stern seas are a plus. It's a kind of "macho" thing. Not to mention any names of course, but a set of initials might just look like... Well, let's just leave it at that. Plus, based on Gene's story, they make good artificial reefs. :) Speaking of wet decks, this is a 22' Bay Ranger: http://tinyurl.com/2rlax5 Specs say it is only 16.5" deep from the cockpit sole to the gunnels...couple of interesting broadsides, and glug, glug, glug. Nice boat for the Florida flats or the North Florida ICW...I'd certainly not take it out in the ocean or a big bay. Tell you what - let's do a little "test". I'll bring my Ranger down there when I leave for SC next week and on my way back, we'll put your Parker up against my Ranger in some heavy wakes or seas. Broadside. I guarentee you I will be nice and dry and you will be soaked. No boots - deck shoes for evidence. And just for giggles, let's see if your 150 Yamaha can pull the stern of my Ranger under. Then we'll see if my ETEC can pull the stern of your Parker under. How 'bout it? Up for it? :) Oh the first part makes perfect sense, as my boat, though a foot shorter than yours (you have a 22' boat, right?), it is about a foot deeper from the deck to the gunnels, has the typical "Carolina flare," has 21 degrees of deadrise at the transom and probably weighs about 1000 pounds more. Right. Makes perfect sense, even though what you are saying violates the laws of physics. Yep, your boat is going to be drier in heavy seas. Sure it is. The second part would be fun if we had the same sized engines on the transom...don't you have a 300 hp deadTec on that wet little boat? :} I only have a 150. |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:56:05 -0400, HK wrote:
Oh the first part makes perfect sense, as my boat, though a foot shorter than yours (you have a 22' boat, right?), it is about a foot deeper from the deck to the gunnels, has the typical "Carolina flare," has 21 degrees of deadrise at the transom and probably weighs about 1000 pounds more. Right. Makes perfect sense, even though what you are saying violates the laws of physics. Yep, your boat is going to be drier in heavy seas. Sure it is. 20' and I can see you are already backing down. Chicken. :) The second part would be fun if we had the same sized engines on the transom...don't you have a 300 hp deadTec on that wet little boat? :} I only have a 150. 200 HO. I'll only go half throttle. :) |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:56:05 -0400, HK wrote: Oh the first part makes perfect sense, as my boat, though a foot shorter than yours (you have a 22' boat, right?), it is about a foot deeper from the deck to the gunnels, has the typical "Carolina flare," has 21 degrees of deadrise at the transom and probably weighs about 1000 pounds more. Right. Makes perfect sense, even though what you are saying violates the laws of physics. Yep, your boat is going to be drier in heavy seas. Sure it is. 20' and I can see you are already backing down. Chicken. :) The second part would be fun if we had the same sized engines on the transom...don't you have a 300 hp deadTec on that wet little boat? :} I only have a 150. 200 HO. I'll only go half throttle. :) You have the 20' SmallBayRanger? Ranger must have dropped that model, as the 20-footer is not rated for 200 horsepower. Unless you are exceeding the recommended maximum. Are the dimensions on your boat, but for length, about the same as the 22-footer? If so, you have a very wide, fairly flat-bottomed, modified vee hull. Hard riding in the chop and wet. I've seen Ranger bay boats out on nice days. How many Parker 2100CC's have you seen? Probably none. There are plenty of Parker 21's out there, but they mostly are the "SE" models. Different boat. |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Oct 8, 9:13?am, Short Wave Sportfishing
I'll only go half throttle. :) Sounds like a half fast compromise to me. :-) |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Oct 8, 9:13?am, Short Wave Sportfishing I'll only go half throttle. :) Sounds like a half fast compromise to me. :-) On the other hand, experiments and demonstrations that promise to violate the laws of physics often are interesting. Tom has proposed one. |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Oct 8, 12:37 pm, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote: On Oct 8, 9:13?am, Short Wave Sportfishing I'll only go half throttle. :) Sounds like a half fast compromise to me. :-) On the other hand, experiments and demonstrations that promise to violate the laws of physics often are interesting. Tom has proposed one. Apples and Oranges.. Each job has it's own tool. Years ago I had a CJ7 and worked at a body shop. The frame guy had a VW (smerk) Rabbit that was set up for, uh, speed. He used to tell me he could take me in the quarter, I told him to hook up bumper to bumper and I would drag him to the local scrap yard;) |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
|
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Oct 8, 12:50 pm, HK wrote:
wrote: On Oct 8, 12:37 pm, HK wrote: Chuck Gould wrote: On Oct 8, 9:13?am, Short Wave Sportfishing I'll only go half throttle. :) Sounds like a half fast compromise to me. :-) On the other hand, experiments and demonstrations that promise to violate the laws of physics often are interesting. Tom has proposed one. Apples and Oranges.. Each job has it's own tool. Years ago I had a CJ7 and worked at a body shop. The frame guy had a VW (smerk) Rabbit that was set up for, uh, speed. He used to tell me he could take me in the quarter, I told him to hook up bumper to bumper and I would drag him to the local scrap yard;) Indeed, but the "riding through the slop" experiment Tom has proposed would end up violating the laws of physics for his boat to win. It just doesn't make any sense. Hummmm, maybe he is yanking your chain?? |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
|
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:52:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: And just for giggles, let's see if your 150 Yamaha can pull the stern of my Ranger under. Then we'll see if my ETEC can pull the stern of your Parker under. How 'bout it? Up for it? :) Where can we buy tickets for this event? I'll provide video service and additional spectator seating.. |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 13:17:17 -0400, HK wrote:
Of course. Tom knows his ****. He's just trying to imitate one of the departed, aka Skipper. If Skipper is "departed" than it's time for lobsta bote pictures. |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 13:17:17 -0400, HK wrote: Of course. Tom knows his ****. He's just trying to imitate one of the departed, aka Skipper. If Skipper is "departed" than it's time for lobsta bote pictures. Departed from here, not from life. If you're on the Miles River, you're a lot closer to the lobsta boat than you know. |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
shipmk wrote: we Build to your Oder! I think I'll pass. After all... My oder inproved when I switch from Brut, to Old Spice... |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:16:13 -0400, HK wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:35:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:10:50 -0000, shipmk wrote: -Special Purpose Vessels: Research Vessel, Training Ship, Floating Dock, Floating Crane, Pleasure Boat, Hospital Ship, Patrol Boat Can you build a low transom 21 foot center console? Why would anyone want to build one of those? There are some who believe that wet decks and unstable platforms in stern seas are a plus. It's a kind of "macho" thing. Not to mention any names of course, but a set of initials might just look like... Well, let's just leave it at that. Plus, based on Gene's story, they make good artificial reefs. :) Speaking of wet decks, this is a 22' Bay Ranger: http://tinyurl.com/2rlax5 Specs say it is only 16.5" deep from the cockpit sole to the gunnels...couple of interesting broadsides, and glug, glug, glug. Nice boat for the Florida flats or the North Florida ICW...I'd certainly not take it out in the ocean or a big bay. Tell you what - let's do a little "test". I'll bring my Ranger down there when I leave for SC next week and on my way back, we'll put your Parker up against my Ranger in some heavy wakes or seas. Broadside. I guarentee you I will be nice and dry and you will be soaked. No boots - deck shoes for evidence. And just for giggles, let's see if your 150 Yamaha can pull the stern of my Ranger under. Then we'll see if my ETEC can pull the stern of your Parker under. How 'bout it? Up for it? :) I'd like to see a test between the ETEC 150 hp and a 140hp (3.0) GM/ Mercuiser. Too far away, but I'd put my little chris craft up to the test. |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:48:00 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: No it doesn't bother me at all for anyone to ask me any question at all. What is the sound of one hand clapping? Answer: Secondly, if you are lost and come to a fork in the road, which one do you take? Answer: The right one |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
HK wrote:
Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 13:17:17 -0400, HK wrote: Of course. Tom knows his ****. He's just trying to imitate one of the departed, aka Skipper. If Skipper is "departed" than it's time for lobsta bote pictures. Departed from here, not from life. If you're on the Miles River, you're a lot closer to the lobsta boat than you know. Wayne, that infamous lobsta boat is in your neighborhood, snap a picture of it. |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: HK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: wrote: On Oct 8, 10:35 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:10:50 -0000, shipmk wrote: -Special Purpose Vessels: Research Vessel, Training Ship, Floating Dock, Floating Crane, Pleasure Boat, Hospital Ship, Patrol Boat Can you build a low transom 21 foot center console? Why would anyone want to build one of those? Fishermen love em' They add structure to the bottom... But they are not big enough to really provide a good home for the monster fish. Now if you tie together about 10 of them, now that would be some good structure. This coming from Reggie, a guy who brownstains his shorts when other posters here ask about his boat. No it doesn't bother me at all for anyone to ask me any question at all. Right...because you won't offer up the information. As many have suggested, all you are here for is to insult others. I had no idea I had insulted you, what did I say? |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:48:00 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: No it doesn't bother me at all for anyone to ask me any question at all. What is the sound of one hand clapping? Answer: Secondly, if you are lost and come to a fork in the road, which one do you take? Answer: The right one Unfortunately, the few parkers I have seen with diesels have been I/O's, which I would not touch with a 10' Pole...or Ukrainian. I talked to some folks at the Parker factory about a "straight" diesel, but was told there was really no reason for one now, what with the high horsepower four cycle outboards. This was three or four years ago. Sometime next year Parker will be introducing a new, 34' pilot house with twin 350 hp Yamaha outboards. At that size and weight, it ain't a boat I would want to trailer or operate with outboards. A 600 hp straight diesel with a small keel/prop pocket, though, would be very nice in that boat. |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:21:15 -0400, HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:56:05 -0400, HK wrote: Oh the first part makes perfect sense, as my boat, though a foot shorter than yours (you have a 22' boat, right?), it is about a foot deeper from the deck to the gunnels, has the typical "Carolina flare," has 21 degrees of deadrise at the transom and probably weighs about 1000 pounds more. Right. Makes perfect sense, even though what you are saying violates the laws of physics. Yep, your boat is going to be drier in heavy seas. Sure it is. 20' and I can see you are already backing down. Chicken. :) The second part would be fun if we had the same sized engines on the transom...don't you have a 300 hp deadTec on that wet little boat? :} I only have a 150. 200 HO. I'll only go half throttle. :) You have the 20' SmallBayRanger? Ranger must have dropped that model, as the 20-footer is not rated for 200 horsepower. Unless you are exceeding the recommended maximum. Finally figured it out - heh... Mines rated for 225 and is a completely different boat from the "new" bay boats. Are the dimensions on your boat, but for length, about the same as the 22-footer? If so, you have a very wide, fairly flat-bottomed, modified vee hull. Hard riding in the chop and wet. Hey - ask Scott. He's been in some crap with me in it. I've seen Ranger bay boats out on nice days. How many Parker 2100CC's have you seen? Probably none. There are plenty of Parker 21's out there, but they mostly are the "SE" models. Different boat. A few actually - very few, but a few. However, Parker's aren't that unique in design - they are pretty much the same old same old when it comes to design - pretty standard boat. No style, no class. :) I'm sorry, that wasn't fair. I apologize. ~~ snerk ~~ |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:37:31 -0400, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote: On Oct 8, 9:13?am, Short Wave Sportfishing I'll only go half throttle. :) Sounds like a half fast compromise to me. :-) On the other hand, experiments and demonstrations that promise to violate the laws of physics often are interesting. Tom has proposed one. But Harry - think of the opportunity to "prove" by experimentation those very laws of physics that you claim make your Parker a superior boat. Dude - think of the bragging rights!! And you just know that I'll do it becasue I'm like Johnny Damon - I'm KRAZZZZY!!! :) |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:21:15 -0400, HK wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:56:05 -0400, HK wrote: Oh the first part makes perfect sense, as my boat, though a foot shorter than yours (you have a 22' boat, right?), it is about a foot deeper from the deck to the gunnels, has the typical "Carolina flare," has 21 degrees of deadrise at the transom and probably weighs about 1000 pounds more. Right. Makes perfect sense, even though what you are saying violates the laws of physics. Yep, your boat is going to be drier in heavy seas. Sure it is. 20' and I can see you are already backing down. Chicken. :) The second part would be fun if we had the same sized engines on the transom...don't you have a 300 hp deadTec on that wet little boat? :} I only have a 150. 200 HO. I'll only go half throttle. :) You have the 20' SmallBayRanger? Ranger must have dropped that model, as the 20-footer is not rated for 200 horsepower. Unless you are exceeding the recommended maximum. Finally figured it out - heh... Mines rated for 225 and is a completely different boat from the "new" bay boats. Are the dimensions on your boat, but for length, about the same as the 22-footer? If so, you have a very wide, fairly flat-bottomed, modified vee hull. Hard riding in the chop and wet. Hey - ask Scott. He's been in some crap with me in it. I've seen Ranger bay boats out on nice days. How many Parker 2100CC's have you seen? Probably none. There are plenty of Parker 21's out there, but they mostly are the "SE" models. Different boat. A few actually - very few, but a few. However, Parker's aren't that unique in design - they are pretty much the same old same old when it comes to design - pretty standard boat. No style, no class. :) I'm sorry, that wasn't fair. I apologize. ~~ snerk ~~ No glitz on Parkers, for sure. That's what is most endearing to me. Is your Ranger finished in metalflake? |
Ship-MKT shipyard, we Build to your Oder!
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 13:56:57 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:52:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: And just for giggles, let's see if your 150 Yamaha can pull the stern of my Ranger under. Then we'll see if my ETEC can pull the stern of your Parker under. How 'bout it? Up for it? :) Where can we buy tickets for this event? There we go Harry - we can make some money off of this deal. I'll provide video service and additional spectator seating.. Stadium seating no less - just like Bob Uecker - "Ow - must be down the front row..." Heh, heh, heh... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com